Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

land of leather/creations


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5160 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi i really hope you would be able to help me. i bought an "interest free for a year" sofa. i payed the exact amount owed by standing order each month and payed it off in full before the end of the interest free period. however i noticed today that for the last 4 months (after the interest free period) they have been taking out of my account a further £65.63 each month. i rang them and they said i owe a further £375.46! this money is the interest they have calculated on the account which they say i owe because to qualify for the interest free period i have to pay an end fee of £35 before the interest free period ends... which is apparently in the small print. is there anything you can suggest? i would really appreciate any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

i do not have agreement. the day i ordered the sofa i left land of leather with a leather cleaning kit and that was it. i have one letter from them saying they went into administration but was is it. i was the one that contacted them asking to pay it off in full within the interest free year. they sent me a standing order form and told me over the phone the amount to pay

Link to post
Share on other sites

Walltolla,

 

OK,

 

This is a classic example of where section 77 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 is supposed to protect consumers.

 

First things first you need to send off a request for information to Creation under section 77 of the consumer credit act together with a postal order for £1.

 

That can be as simple as:

 

Dear Sir,

 

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION UNDER SECTION 77 OF THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT

 

Account Number: xxxx

Agreement Number: yyyy

 

Please send me all the information required under section 77 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

I enclose a postal order for the statutory fee of £1.

 

Yours

 

Waltolla

 

Either send it registered post or get a proof of posting from the counter at the post office.

 

They should send back within 12 working days a copy of the agreement together with a statement saying what you have paid and what you still owe.

 

Second they appear to have mislead you about free for a year if there was a termination fee; and

 

third if they had a direct debit mandate and the payment was properly due why did they not just take it from your bank account. Did they try to take a payment which was rejected?

 

On issues 2&3 I think it would be worth talking to your local council's trading standards department.

 

That should keep you going for the moment.

 

Dad

Link to post
Share on other sites

FAO The Complaints Department - Creation Consumer Finance Limited

 

Re Agreement No: ********

Account No: ********

 

On the "Annual Statement" you sent to my address this week, you stated this :- "Amount of Credit provided under the original agreement: £1249.00" and also the "Date of Agreement: 27/01/2009".

 

The original agreement i took out with yourselves (Creation Consumer Finance Limited) was a "1 year interest free agreement."

 

As you have informed me the "Date of Agreement was 27/01/2009, this means that my "1 year interest free agreement" ended 27/01/2010.

Please remember i have a copy of this document and will produce it if needed in a Court Of Law.

 

In addition to the payments i made to you stated on this "Annual Statement," i also made 3 payments of £113.55 on the following dates, 01/12/08, 30/12/08, 09/01/09.

 

Therefore the total amount i have payed to "Creation Consumer Finance Limited" is (11 months payment via standing order of £113.55 = £1249.05) + (3 months payment via direct debit mandate of £65.63 = £196.89) = £1445.94

 

To reiterate as stated on my "Annual Statement", (in your words) the "Amount of Credit provided under the original agreement: £1249.00".

This means that you, (Creation Consumer Finance Limited) owe me £196.94.

 

In a letter sent to me from yourselves (Creation Consumer Finance Limited), signed by 'George Sanderson', it states "Our decision to grant you a loan was on the basis that your repayments would be made by Direct Debit". This is incorrect.

 

I would like the £196.94 that you owe me sent in cheque form to my address this week.

I would like a letter confirming my account with "Creation Consumer Finance Limited" is closed and also stating that i do not owe the company any money.

I am also asking for a REQUEST FOR INFORMATION UNDER SECTION 77 OF THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT.

Please send me all the information required under section 77 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

I enclose a postal order for the statutory fee of £1.

 

Yours

 

Mr Waltolla

Link to post
Share on other sites

Waltolla,

 

Can you scan and post the credit agreement, obviously removing your personal details, bar codes & signatures. I am particularly interested in the exact dates on the agreement and how it expresses the interest free period.

 

Did you contact your local trading standards?

 

Dad

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aaah, the old "you agreed to pay by DD" ploy. They did the same with me, and I sent them off with a flea in their ear, as I know what they don't, which is I wouldn't take an agreement with them if payment by DD had been a condition of it, as I believe that DD are the tool of the devil and do not take them unless there is absolutely no other way, something which I can substantiate if need be. I also made that very clear to the LoL salesman on the day of the purchase, and he faithfully promised I could pay by other means... And with LoL gone, there is no way Creation Finance can say otherwise anyway.

 

Keep an eye on them for those £30 charges, as the letter says "may", but as far as I know, they just bang them on anyway, and that is totally reclaimable.

 

IF they have a £35 end of BNPL fee included in their contracts, then you are going to have a hard time convincing a judge that you didn't know about it. You are after all supposed to read things before you sign the contract and if you put your signature to it, then you agree to it, so that could be tricky.

 

Also, you say you weren't given a copy of the contract. Whatever the reason for it, I think you are going to have problems with that one, the reason being the finance is provided by Creation, and they are not linked with LoL by any other link apart from them providing the finance, if that makes sense. In other words, there is no way Creation could have arranged a BNPL for you without the paperwork coming from LoL and Creation agreeing to giving you the finance. You must have signed something somewhere to obtain that finance surely? Furthermore, Creation must have written to you before about it, confirming the BNPL agreement, are you sure you haven't ignored some of their letters? I ask because you say you have only noticed after FOUR months that they were still helping themselves to your money and that, I'm sorry to say, suggests a certain lack of attention to financial matters.

 

Your saving grace may be that their paperwork is not in order/not compliant and this is where the CCA74 request comes in. If they can't supply a copy of the credit agreement, then they are going to be in a much weaker position. If they do have it, then your position is going to be much weaker. So it all rides on that really.

 

Please post whatever you receive in reply to your CCA request (with personal info removed of course) as soon as you get it and we'll be able to help further from there. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

To bookworm. Thank you for your input. Yes i agree i have not payed enough attention to my financial matters. I have been going through a very stressful time recently and have taken my eye off the ball. However this experience has taught me a nasty lesson which i will not forget. I am much for financially aware and i certainly would never take out a credit agreement ever again.

 

To Dad. Thank you so much for your support. I could not have done this without you. After these letters were sent LOL agreed to pay me back all of the money i had paid in interest. However cheesy this may sound, you have made a massive difference to my life and i couldn't possibly thank you enough.

Many thanks and best wishes

A very relieved Waltolla

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...