Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
    • hi lolerz many thanks for your reply and help. My 2 months has passed i was waiting until the court proceedings started. As i went through this process not that long ago, i shall look back at my old thread for how to respond. Ill get the docs scanned soon thanks.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

solicitor acting under CFA want £2000


Honey1932
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5222 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Earlier in the year I put a UCA claim through a CMC, it was audited with breaches then allocated to a solicitor. The loan agreement had an outstanding balance of £10,000 plus a large single sum of ppi. Initially the solicitor said I had a good case, so I signed a Conditional Fee Agreement (no win no fee) but little did I realise he had his eye on the juicy ppi. The Lender would not accept that the agreement was unenforceable but admitted the ppi was missold and sent me a cheque for the ppi made payable to me. Solicitor said I should just accept the refund, forget the UCA and pay him 25% + vat of the ppi refund :eek:.

 

I said no, because the claim was a UCA claim, so they pursued Nat West on unenforceability without success. I was also told I couldn't cash the cheque because it would make me liable for all their costs.

 

I waited patiently a futher 6 months whilst hey tried to settle with Nat West paying their costs but NW refused, so now they want me to pay a large part of them.

 

The cheque expired so I asked sol to let it run its course, but I will have paid the loan off in full by the time it gets to court. The sol is now saying that due to recent test cases , I have very little chance of success so I should just accept the refund, cut our losses and pay up.

 

I was never advised that this was a possibility, I paid £295 on the pretext of nothing else to pay. Had I just wanted a ppi claim I could have paid £10 and agreed a back end fee of 20% payable to the solicitor or easily have got the refund myself without having to instruct a solicitor..

 

I didn't get what I initially asked for, so am I liable to pay them £2000 partial costs from the ppi or should I ask my Lender for a new cheque and cash it? Would a Judge view that I had won without costs, broken the terms of my CFA and expect me to pay.

 

I know this is effectively a DIY site and believe me I have tried myself to settle other unenforceable credit cards, but I note on other threads many of us have been beguiled by the CMC's magic solution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Honey1932

 

Quote fornm your post

 

"The cheque expired so I asked sol to let it run its course, but I will have paid the loan off in full by the time it gets to court. The sol is now saying that due to recent test cases , I have very little chance of success so I should just accept the refund, cut our losses and pay up."

 

 

 

Banks will usually reject cheques that are more than six months old but, in fact, it's at their discretion. They can choose to cash it if they want to so don't assume that if you wrote a cheque to someone over six months ago that you're off the hook from paying it! Cheques actually remain legally valid for six years - yes, I did say six years - and the only way to cancel a cheque is to ask for a 'stop' to be placed on it. However, cheques backed by a cheque guarantee card cannot be stopped.

 

 

Being as it is a Bank Cheque the Nat West MUST inform you in writing that it is no longer valid until they do its still valid

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sparkie

 

Sorry if I haven't explained myself very well, to be honest, I have already spoken with the bank and they said they will issue a new cheque, once they have checked it hasn't been cashed so that is not really a problem.

 

My main concern is being liable for Thousands of pounds if I get sued for breaking the terms of the sol's CFA. Even though according to another poster on another thread, the majority of solicitors handling these cmc claims are 4th rate lawyers who don't understand how to make a proper claim.

 

Honey

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, it might throw a whole new light on things, will look into it tomorrow. How do I access solicitors code of conduct, do I have to contact the Sol Regulation Authority?

 

Honey

Edited by Honey1932
post by mistake
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sparkie

 

I received a new cheque today from my Lender. Will the above acts still protect me if I cash it.?

 

Many Thanks

Honey

 

Hi Honey,

 

You can get the code of conduct here.

www.sra.org.uk/rules/

 

Personally I would cash the cheque ...but get other opinions as well don't just take my view as it is a personal view and not direct advice.............. it is only what I would do in your position.............and wait to see what the solicitor does ......in the meantime make a complaint to the legal complaints service.

 

www.legalcomplaints.org.uk/

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, The guy from the CMC has said he would cash it also, so I am beginning to feel more confident and will fight it all the way.

 

Thanks also for the links. I imagine once the sol finds out he will invoice me and try to claim through the small claims court.

 

Honey

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...