Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Court Papers recieved/Debtor without a leg to stand on


Nicola85
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5258 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've just recieved court papers for a store card debt and I need some advice.

 

I'm being taken to court over a debt. To be honest I don't think I have a leg to stand on. The debt is mine. I now have no money to pay.

 

I also don't have a defence if I fill in that I deny the debt. The debt is mine and I have recieved a CCA.

 

If I fill in the forms and accept that the debt is mine, I'll be given a CCJ.

If I fill in the forms and deny that the debt is mine, it's more than likely that the creditor will prove it's mine, I'll still be given a CCJ and I'll have to pay more.

 

I won't be able to turn up to court on the day as it's in Nottingham and I'm severely ill and can't attend. So I'll end up with a CCJ.

 

Could anyone give me some advice on what my options are. I have no idea what I'm going to do if I get a CCJ. I'm on benefits that pay next to nothing, I don't have an income, owne my own home or car and I have no goods for them to take.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, take a step back and try to approach this calmly. If you've only just received the papers, there's no desperate rush to do anything at all and you can take the time to get some advice. It sounds as if the claim has been issued through MCOL so there should be a reference on the papers which allows you to acknowledge service online, which you should do as soon as possible, but at least well within 14 days. This will give you an extra 14 days in which to decide what to do.

 

Worst possible case is that, after considering all advice, you decide to admit the claim and make an offer of payment. In your circumstances the creditor would be stupid not to accept whatever you can reasonably afford, but if they don't a judge will decide what is reasonable based upon your income, which if you're on benefits will be next to nothing. You say you have no assets so to be honest I think the creditor is being ridiculous even trying to take this to court.

 

So that you can get the best possible advice, could you please answer the following questions:-

 

1. Who is the original creditor, and who has issued the proceedings? Have you ever had a notice of assignment?

 

2. What correspondence have you received from them prior to issue? Do you have anything headed 'default notice' or 'letter before action'? If so, could you either remove all your personal details, including any bar codes, and post copies on this thread, or type up the wording of those letters, again without any personal details.

 

3. Have you had advice as to whether the CCA is enforceable? Again remove personal details, and post it up on here.

 

4. Do you know if any charges have been applied to the account?

 

5. What, exactly, do the particulars of claim say? Don't include the exact figure they are claiming, but round it off a bit.

 

If you decided to dispute this, the claim would be transferred to your local court and you would not have to go to Nottingham. Unless you owe rather a large amount, disputing the claim is unlikely to cost you anything extra over and above what they are already claiming, and since you can't pay them you are going to end up with a CCJ if you don't dispute it so it has to be worth at least exploring the possibilities. A CCJ is not the end of the world. No one can take money you don't have or goods you don't have or send you to prison for it.

 

I know it's easy for me to say, but try not to worry about it. Once you've given us some more information you'll get advice as to what your options are and be in a much better position to decide what to do.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, take a step back and try to approach this calmly. If you've only just received the papers, there's no desperate rush to do anything at all and you can take the time to get some advice. It sounds as if the claim has been issued through MCOL so there should be a reference on the papers which allows you to acknowledge service online, which you should do as soon as possible, but at least well within 14 days. This will give you an extra 14 days in which to decide what to do.

 

Worst possible case is that, after considering all advice, you decide to admit the claim and make an offer of payment. In your circumstances the creditor would be stupid not to accept whatever you can reasonably afford, but if they don't a judge will decide what is reasonable based upon your income, which if you're on benefits will be next to nothing. You say you have no assets so to be honest I think the creditor is being ridiculous even trying to take this to court.

 

So that you can get the best possible advice, could you please answer the following questions:-

 

1. Who is the original creditor, and who has issued the proceedings? Have you ever had a notice of assignment?

 

The original creditor was House of Fraser. They are Santander Cards UK. The debt collector was Viking Collection Services. But I never had a notice of assignment form Viking Collection Services.

 

The letter of assignment I got today from Howard Cohen Solicitors says:

 

We hereby give you notice that Santander Cards UK Limited have by assignment dated 13th january, 2010 and made between Santander Cards UK Limited and CL Finance Limited absolutley a debt in the sum of around £1000 due and owing by you to them for the balance due under the acount number >>> and you are required to pay the same benefit of CL Finance Limited accordingly.

 

2. What correspondence have you received from them prior to issue? Do you have anything headed 'default notice' or 'letter before action'? If so, could you either remove all your personal details, including any bar codes, and post copies on this thread, or type up the wording of those letters, again without any personal details.

 

I've not had any paper work from House of Fraser except for monthly statements and at the bottom of the statement it always said that the balance owed had been transfered to a debt collector. I've never recieved a default notice or letter before action but thats their word against mine. The only letter I've recieved was 22/09/09 telling me that Santander Cards UK account had been transfered to Viking Collection Services. Since then I've been waiting for Viking to write to me but I recieved no more letters till today when I recieved the Court paers and a Notice of Assignment.

 

3. Have you had advice as to whether the CCA is enforceable? Again remove personal details, and post it up on here.

 

I've never asked for a CCA the debt collector never sent me any letters saying they had my debt.

 

4. Do you know if any charges have been applied to the account?

 

A lot of charges have been applied to the account it started out around the £800 mark and now it's around the £1000 mark.

 

5. What, exactly, do the particulars of claim say? Don't include the exact figure they are claiming, but round it off a bit.

 

The letter of assignment says: A claim has today been submitted to the County Court for issue. You should respond to the Claim immediatley upon receipt.

 

Payment in full of around the £1000, being the total ammount shown due in the Claim including costs, will prevent judgement being enterd against you.

 

If you decided to dispute this, the claim would be transferred to your local court and you would not have to go to Nottingham. Unless you owe rather a large amount, disputing the claim is unlikely to cost you anything extra over and above what they are already claiming, and since you can't pay them you are going to end up with a CCJ if you don't dispute it so it has to be worth at least exploring the possibilities. A CCJ is not the end of the world. No one can take money you don't have or goods you don't have or send you to prison for it.

 

I know it's not the end of the world. It's just I'm severley i'll and any stress of balliffs visiting me and court visits can put me in hospital. Heart conditions run in my family and I just lost my Grandad a few weeks ago to a heart attack. I don't want the same thing to happen to me.

 

I know it's easy for me to say, but try not to worry about it. Once you've given us some more information you'll get advice as to what your options are and be in a much better position to decide what to do.

 

Thank you so much for your advice. I'm reading it well and trying to take it all in. Your all being very helpful. Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The account has been open since 2005.

 

So I now fill in the acknowledgement of service form and the defence form that says I deny the debt and then I send a letter to the DC asking for paperwork?

Edited by Nicola85
Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I send this letter to Howard Cowen Solicitors who are acting on behalf of CL finnance?

 

You will need to edit this, send by recorded to the claimants solicitor and keep the receipt

 

 

Dear Sir,

 

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name) Case No:

CPR 31.14 Request

 

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the (Name) County Court.

 

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

 

[Prior to the issue of proceedings I had delivered a request for the production of the agreement mentioned in the Claim Form and on which you rely. That request was ignored][delete if no such request was delivered]

 

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

 

1 the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

2 the default notice*

 

* delete if not mentioned in the Particulars of claim.

 

[Although your claim is for a sum which is not more than £5,000.00 and will in all likelihood be allocated to the small claims track for determination upon my delivering a defence, at this moment in time I have not delivered my defence and the case has not been allocated to a track. In consequence the provisions of CPR 27(2) are of no effect and you should not seek to avoid compliance with your CPR 31 duties by claiming otherwise]#

 

# delete if claim for a sum exceeding £5,000.00

 

You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31 duties and ensure that the document(s) I have requested are copied to and received by me within 7 days of receiving this letter. Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy. Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

 

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligation to recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of a third party.

 

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

 

If you require more time in which to comply with this request you must tell me in writing. You must tell me before the time for compliance with this request has expired. In telling me you require more time you must tell me what steps you have taken and propose to take in order to comply with this request and also state a date by when you will comply with this request. In addition your statement must be accompanied with a statement that you agree to an extension of the time for me to file my defence. Your extension of time must be not less than 14 days from the date when you say you will have complied with my request and you must state the new date for filing my defence.

 

If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.

 

Please note that if you should fail to comply with this request, fail to request more time or fail to agree to an extension of time for the filing of my defence, I will make an application to the court for an order that the proceedings be struck out or stayed for non-compliance and a summary costs order.

 

I do hope this will not be necessary and look forward to hearing from you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The account has been open since 2005.

 

So I now fill in the acknowledgement of service form and the defence form that says I deny the debt and then I send a letter to the DC asking for paperwork?

 

All you need to do at this point is acknowledge the claim and state you intend to defend the claim in full (if you are intending to do that). Do not enter a defence yet.

 

Once you have acknowledged then send the 31.14 request.

 

However, you have still not typed up what the POC'S are?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...