Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, You can't make EVRi investigate something. The only thing you could potentially look to do is take EVRi to court for the value of the lost parcel, however with a value of only £25 there will be limited point to doing that.
    • Is the letter headed Letter of Claim/before Claim or similar? If not, it sounds like more of the threatogram chain. If you're not sure, post up an anonymised copy of the letter and we'll check. HB
    • So guess what, we have received a final demand letter for £100. It states if payment is not made by 11/06 they will have no option but to forward the case to their litigation dept with a view to commence County Court Proceedings. So just wondering if anyone has any advice. Do we ignore this? or do we need to take action? Thanks 
    • hi dx, thanks for helping just re-reading everything this morning and I must have missed this one from uncle in his thread "What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. "  are you in disagreement with this based on your last sentence?
    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Virgin Media


pangasius
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5316 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

This is my first thread, so HI!!!!

 

My wife and I were with NTL for broadband and TV for quite a while when they changed over to Virgin Media.

 

All was fine for the first year or so, until the monthly bills gradually started to climb higher and higher until it got to a point where we both thought it was getting silly.

 

We cancelled the packages we had with them and are now with sky and BT, which is fine and cheaper. After still getting bills from them to the tune of £3 credit for a year, we (its in my wife's name, so obviously they won't talk to me) decided to collect this princely sum.

 

The next month, we had a cheque from them for £3, along with £6 admin fee. This fee has been taken off the account, but yesterday, we recieved a bill for £1.22 for paper billing!

 

How can we stop this stupidity!?

 

Thanks for listening to a rant of a desperate man!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you find an answer please let me know

 

I had Virgin broadband (I started with BlueYonder, NTL took it over, then Virgin took it over), the broadband was great but the billing and customer services was a joke.

 

I cancelled with them over an argument about £1.25 (paper billing) that they over charged me, I told them they could credit my account with £1.25 or I'd change service providers and they would lose £18 a month, they said cancel because they wouldn't refund my £1.25 under any circumstances.

 

Now their cancellations team is rining me offering 3 months line rental free and a discount for a further 9 months.

 

They really are a bunch of muppets

 

Mossy

 

(Apologies to Kermit, Miss Piggy et al for the insult)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Virgin are a joke , if i miss my due date i never rush out to pay my bill , i like to get value for money for my £10 late payment charge , a phonecall and a letter , ( ok i know and you know that this doesnt amount to a tenner ) but its nice to get something in return . However i have just sent them a bill for £10.00 for the late delivery and the late phonecall reminder, seems to me if im paying a tenner for something then i should recieve it in a timely manner. Mon 9th Nov 6.10 pm phone rings , VM seeking a credit card or debit card payment from either me or friends and family , Sorry i cant help you there im afraid , though i will pay by paypoint tomorrow. Ok sir i have placed a note on your account to that effect . Tues 10th 8pm i duly pay my phone bill via paypoint as agreed . Wed 11th awoke to find my services had gone during the night , quick phonecall to VM confirms that they have indeed restricted my services for non payment , I of course mentioned the verbal agreement with their collections team , Oh im sorry sir but they must not of had enough time to stop the restriction ! So you mean they left the call too late? We are quite busy sir . Thurs 12th letter arrives dated 5th Nov " we dont seem to have recieved your payment you should pay us immediatley to stop restrictions being applied to your account. Bit late on that one as well . I have written to them pointing out that i felt i didnt get the value for my £10.00 due to their late payment letter and phonecall being too late , and i felt i had no other option than to impose a late notification charge of £10.00 . Bet it goes down like a lead balloon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...