Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • an that - it seems to be the poop approach We have reduced inflation massively err from the massive amount we caused it to rise too We will give pensioners a tiny smidgen back - of the much much larger amount we've already ripped them off We will reduce some taxes a tiny amount.. from the record amount we have raised it too and reduce services twice as much  to pay for our VIPals extravagances the list goes on   Even their smears are feeble Wet Sunak dribbles over his own feet and needs his pals pretending to be 'real people to ask questions,  while Starmer regularly plays 5 a side Raynor pays her bills, while Tories sell taxpayer funded second houses at a profit - no doubt routed through tax avoidance schemes
    • I'd say concern about the landfill operator is absolutely necessary. I think the word they could mean is 'embarrassing'.
    • Just to cover yourself, you should write them a letter in response telling them that you are rejecting their offer. That they know full well that their insurance is an attempt to limit or exclude liability contrary to section 57 Consumer rights act and is a secondary contract contrary to section 72.  By the way was the offer made without prejudice or in confidence or anything? Maybe you could post up their offer here please
    • "Dear HR, I refer to my correspondence of *date* in which I challenged xxx, copy attached. Clearly this was a grievance, and yet does not seem to have been heard under the grievance procedure. I am exceptionally dismayed that this 'review'. which never took place, seems to be being used as a criteria in redundancy selection proceedings. As this is time critical, please advise asap."            
    • Just to update, received a revised offer of £75 from P2G after they got my LOC last Friday. They stated that because it was not insured this would be their final offer. Looks like we are going to court.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

New Look store card


AverageMan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5336 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I apologise this is a rather long post. I wanted to be as clear and descriptive as possible. I do hope you do not get to bored reading this.

 

Ok I have searched the forums to find similar cases to mine and had no luck....

 

My OH has received a letter from Advantis Credit. They wish to recover money on behalf of a client called Ikano.

OH found this odd she had never heard of them.

 

With the help of google we discovered that it was likely to do with a New Look store card.

 

In Nov 2007 she was in New Look and was about to pay for some goods when she was offered a discount if she took a store card (naively she accepted the offer) and she did not really understand what it was about. She says she was under the impression that her debit card details were taken and as the store card would be posted to her that her debit card could would be used to settle the bill of £28.00.

 

Shortly after she received a letter in the post with her New Look card attached.

 

She tends to keep most letters in a reasonably organised fashion so we managed to find the letter from New Look.

 

The card that arrived in the post with the letter had a sticker on it saying, " Before using your card please ensure the main account holder calls us to register it"

This therefore led her to believe that all was fine because the card had not been activated.

 

She has since discovered the credit agreement along with the original receipt for the purchase. This does appear to show the purchase was made with the store card as it shows the last 4 digits of the store card on the receipt.

 

She moved home shortly after and of course informed the usual people of her new address the bank, mobile phone company and with anyone she felt needed to know. Of course she never realised she needed to let New Look know.

 

Just some background information.

 

Between Dec 2007 and May 2008 she lived in one property, and then from May 2008 until April 2009 another, both of which were registered with her bank and mobile phone company.

 

From April 2009 until now she has been using my address as a postal address just for her bank as she was concerned about the security of her mail at her current shared accommodation.

 

She is a foreign national who has been living in the UK for almost four years has always worked and always paid her bills. She has no other outstanding debts.

 

She is absolutely terrified and in a state of panic, she is definitely sure that she does not want to speak to anyone by phone. What she did want to do initially was to get me to phone them on her behalf and find out how much she owes and work out a payment plan.

 

Although it was only £28.00 in the first place she is aware that it will have increased greatly in the 23 months that have passed. They have an APR of 28.9% and I believe a monthly charge of £12 for non payment. Which I guess is pretty standard. Knowing this is there any way to calculate what she is likely to owe before we call.

 

Had I let her make contact initially she would have made enquiries as to what the matter was about and would have genuinely appeared to be none the wiser. Having now done the research we know what it is about and do not want it to appear that she has known all along and just dodged it.

 

I myself have had some debt issues which most of I was genuinely at fault. With the case of my OH I believe she has been misled. She could have quite easily settled the bill had she been aware of it.

 

Just like any average person in the street she did not really understand what she was getting into, and English being her second language did not help.

 

Having read through much of the info on here and from other sources I am slightly better informed than I was in the first place, but since I did not find anyone with a similar case I would really appreciate any advice.

 

I have some questions on what action (if any) she should take.

  • Should she make contact to ask what this is about?
  • I guess if she is to make contact then written contact is best. If that is the case is email acceptable?
  • I guess in the first instance she would have to say, yes I am the person named. What is the matter about?
  • Once she acknowledges she is the person named in the letter. Would it be best to request proof of how she owes this money and how much she owes?
  • Should she request a copy of the credit agreement?
  • As English is her second language, does that give her any leverage?
  • Is there anyway of finding if any of the rules were broken when this agreement was taken out?
  • Anyone know how they tracked her to my address she only uses it as postal address for her bank account.
  • As she has the right to ask for any data they hold on her, does she have the right to ask how they tracked her down?

Thanks all for taking the time to read this. Also thanks in advance to anyone who takes the time to reply.

Edited by AverageMan
rephrasing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I appreciate it can take some time to get a reply. Just wanted to add further info.

 

Having looked at the credit agreement which she has signed (unwittingly) we noticed that apart from the usual terms and conditions the only personal information that has been added to it is her signature. No name or address has been filled in.

 

I realise that the original will probably have had those details added after.

 

What I am saying is does it benefit us in anyway by having this?

Can we use it to suggest that it's not enforceable?

 

I am in no way suggesting a free pass for her debt as such, she always pays all her bills on time. She has a perfect credit score. She even sends home money to her family.

 

We just feel she was duped into signing the credit agreement. Though without proof I do not see that as been useful to us.

 

It's just this trivial amount of £28 which will have snowballed into hundreds of pounds (perhaps even a thousand) would have been long paid for had she been aware.

 

If it means settling and paying £100-£200 so be it. Any more than that is just too much.

 

We go away in few weeks time on holiday and as we do not get much free time to relax together. I do not want this to be a talking point while we are away, so we would really like to get the ball rolling as quickly as possible.

 

I appreciate that there are people assiting others as well as me.

 

Thanks all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you need to write back to new look, advising them that the card was not reistered or used, also adding that the item purchased was pain for by the Debit card at the time of purchace and that your partner had no intention of opening a store account, but fely unduly presurised into doing so. This is whitnessed by the fact that the store card has not been used subsequently.

 

Keep it simple to start with and post back with their response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...