Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have recently found myself in financial difficulties and with the help of forum members in another thread regarding this, I think I can get myself sorted. My query here is how to deal with a Cifas marker that has been logged against me by one of my creditors for "evasion of payment". Admittedly yes I did get a £5000 loan with them and have not paid any payment but at the start of the year, which is when the loan landed, I realised I was going to be struggling to repay that and other debts and I contacted MCB to ask if there was any way I could extend the loan from 24 months to 36 months. I explained my situation and that I was going with a DMP and asked them if they could help me with this. They did not reply. I then emailed them again a month later explaining that my DMP was going ahead and could they confirm that the direct debit was indeed cancelled. Again, they did not reply. The DMP fell apart and so did everything else thereafter. My bank withdrew my overdraft and said I could not stay with them (I thought initially that it was because of the DMP) so I opened another account (Starling) and set up all my direct debits etc with the new bank. A month into being with the new bank, they contacted me and said they were closing my account in three months. So I started applying for other basic accounts and every single one of them either refused or revoked.  Through the help in the other thread, I requested a SAR from Cifas and discovered that I have this marker against my name for "evasion of payment". I have logged a complaint with MCB on the advice of other forum members, but my query really is do you think the marker is fair given that I did ask them for help and I did explain that I was going to be struggling financially to repay the loan over the original two years, and is there any way that I can get it removed? I fully admit that I have yet to make a payment to them and I suppose in my naivety and panic I thought if I emailed them early on they could extend the loan and help me out, but they didn't even reply  I did manage to open an account with Monzo before the marker was in place, but I am very concerned that if Monzo do what Starling did, I will have no bank account to pay my bills or get my wages paid into.  Realistically based on the information I have given here, what do you think my chances are of getting this marker removed? Any help/advice on this would be greatly appreciated x
    • Thank you dx, that is what I intend to do now. I have gone through all the SAR documents, a lot of which I am seeing for the first time! As per my previous post #116 letters and statements alleged to have been sent to me, as recorded on their system notes I have not received. Letters I have sent requesting information and account statements have not been recorded as being received by them, all were sent either by Recorded or Special Delivery. I have all the proof you menrtioned from my files for payments and from their SAR info for fees added. Thanks t
    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mums TBI Ccj In 2001, Still Chasing Payment- Have A Caution On Property


emanevs
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5132 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I hope anyone can help.

 

My mum is being chased by a firm called TBI Financial.

 

In 2001 a CCJ was made against her in Feb 2001, and a charging order by caution was made in 2001.

 

I have asked for a copy of the CCA agreement, they have ignored this, and I have also made a subject access request but they have not replied.

 

Do I have to submit an N1 court claim and try to get all this removed that way??

 

My mum did ring and asked to pay £10 a month - but all this sounds well dogey???

 

any help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ref The Charging Order

 

Was It Granted Because She Failed To Make Payments On The Ccj

 

IS IT A CREDIT CARD DEBT/LOAN

 

HAVE YOU CONFIRMED A CHARGING ORDER IS ON THE HOUSE

 

WHO WAS THE ORIGINAL LOAN COMPANY

Edited by postggj
Link to post
Share on other sites

No reply to judgement (in default), ie. My mum did not reply or to her knowledge received the claim form.

 

Charging Order Absolute made April 2001, upon the application of TBI Financial Sevices, and on reading the affidavits on Neil Somerville filed herin and the order nisi made on the 2nd March 2001

 

My mum did not turn up to court, probably didnt know!

 

They now want over £6500 quid on a judgement of £2842.54????

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep, just starting getting heavy.

 

£10 payment made in 2nd October 2009. phoned them on 22nd sept to discuss the debt.

 

no proof of debty provided, ie, havent seen the credit agreement - probably havent got it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So It Took The Eight Years To Start Chasing Payment

Thats Not Going To Look To Good For Tbi Financial

 

Right

 

Sending A Cca Request Is No Good On This One As A Ccj Has Allready Been Granted

 

You Need To Send An Sar To Tbi Financial

 

As Its So Old I Doubt The Original Creditor Will Have The Docs

 

To Get Rid Of The Charging Order We Will Need To Get Rid Of The Ccj By A Set Asside

 

Can Any One Confirm If A Creditor Has Not Pursued A Ccj For Six Years Permission Of The Court Would Be Needed

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry

 

getting ahead of myself

 

as six years and over has passed since payment on a ccj, i believe but dont quote me,

tbi would now need the permission of the court to demand money.

the court will want to know why they have left it so long

 

as the account has been terminated and subject to a ccj, the creditor has no reason for sending out an agreement via a cca request

 

you need to send tbi a sar and quote the docs you need as they prob have none.

 

fire away your questions

 

i have a tendancy to answer in riddles

Link to post
Share on other sites

the ccj needs to be set asside before a charging order can be revoked

 

they have shot them self in the foot by waiting this long

 

i dont think the ccj can be enforced any more or even the charging order

 

dont quote me

 

still digging

Link to post
Share on other sites

paying the ocassional £10 I think, last one october 2009??

 

In their last letter the only way they are proving the debt is

 

1) Correspondence dated 11th Jan 2000 stating that "i would appreciate you sending me the forms in order for me to set up a direct debit with my bank in order to pay off this balance"

2) Copies of the CCJ and Caution application.

 

NO CCA, OR CREDIT AGREEMENT??

 

I also thought they cannot add interest unless the CCJ was over £5000???

Link to post
Share on other sites

on the charging order - absolute its says

 

.... stand charged with the payment of xxxx the amount due from the defendant to the claimant on a judgement of this court dated xxx together with any interest* and £170 costs of this application, the costs to be added to the judgement debt.

 

*where judgement is entered for more than £5000 or includes a sum in respect of contractual or late payment interest, the claimant may be entitled to further interest.

 

any thoughts??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...