Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Robinson vs Lloyds


snapper84
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6497 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I didn't find this site until i'd already posted a letter to the head office :-o i think the letter i sent was the LBA, but just got a bog standard reply letter through the post with the ending "This is the Banks Final Response blah blah 6 month ombudsman" so i'm guessing all thats happened is that i missed a step.

 

Now i'm claiming for £2258 so now i guess i have to run the spreadsheet and work out the interest for it.

 

Also the letter is dated 10th August so therfore i'm guessing i have to wait 14 days before filing the moneyclaim.

 

Cheers

Steven

Robinson vs Lloyds (29/07/06)

LBA Sent (29/07/06)

Standard Reply (01/08/06)

FOS Letter Recieved (10/08/06)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one quick question, my account is about £740 overdrawn on a limit of £200 this is all down to charges implied to the account. Do i just proceed with the claim and any money that is claimed back will cover this amount?

 

Cheers

Steven

Robinson vs Lloyds (29/07/06)

LBA Sent (29/07/06)

Standard Reply (01/08/06)

FOS Letter Recieved (10/08/06)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steven and Welcome ,

I also stupidly missed a step at the beginning , same as you , but if I was up to this stage now what I would do is still send them another letter (at the end of the 14 days ) saying that you are prepared to give them another 14 days as a goodwill gesture .The reason for this is that you have to prove to the court that you have acted reasonably throughout and that a claim was a last resort .The court would look at 28 days as being a reasonable amount of time for you to try and settle this hence the reasons our 2 letters give 14 days.

 

Do you mean your letter was dated 10th August or theirs ? as its you that sets the time limit , 14 days from your letter

 

As for your overdraft , they can call this in at anytime but seen as they owe you more then your O/D if they try then you can write and tell them its in dispute .

 

Your repayment will wipe out your O/D but this is then one debt less :)

 

have you also opened another account so as they can't be taking even more charges from you with you being so O/D ?

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers MJanet,

 

Does anyone have an email address that i could submit a further letter to them if this is recommended.

I mean that their letter was dated 10th of August, i sent them the letter on the 29th July. Yes i already had another account elsewhere with barclays so i'm using that one now.

 

Regards

Steven

Robinson vs Lloyds (29/07/06)

LBA Sent (29/07/06)

Standard Reply (01/08/06)

FOS Letter Recieved (10/08/06)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just got the email address, any advice which letter to send them considering i missed the first one, i was thinking of just typing on up myself a fairly standard letter including a date i will begin court proceedings and at that time interest will be applied to the amount requested. Any advice?

 

Cheers

Robinson vs Lloyds (29/07/06)

LBA Sent (29/07/06)

Standard Reply (01/08/06)

FOS Letter Recieved (10/08/06)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right i've decided against sending them another letter and allowing them to stall, i know people have different opinions on this but i've had the letter stating it's the banks final response therfore they have reviewed the situation and declined to do anything about it so i'm going to progress. And the other end of the stick is financial problems so the sooner i get this started the sooner it can get settled.

 

Right here's my moneyclaim just want someone to check it over to make sure it's all present and correct.

I have a contract with Lloyds TSB Bank PLC,

conducted on their standard terms and

conditions.I am claiming return of my money

taken by the Defendant in the way of charges

over the last 4 years totalling £2258. The

charges are a disproportionate penalty and

therefore unenforceable, being contrary to

common law. Further, as a disproportionate

penalty they are invalid under the Unfair

(Contracts)Terms Act 1977 s.4 and the Unfair

Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations

1999.Para8.and sch.2(1)(e).In the event that

the charges are not a penalty then they are

unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply

of Goods And Services Act 1982 s.15. I have

repeatedly asked the Bank to justify their

charges but they have declined to do so. I

claim interest of £266.25 under section 69 of

the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8%

a year from 01/11/02 to 19/06/06. I therefore

claim a total of £2524.25(£2258 + £266.25)

plus interest at the same rate up to the date

of judgement, or earlier payment, at a daily

rate of £0.50.

 

Cheers

Steven

Robinson vs Lloyds (29/07/06)

LBA Sent (29/07/06)

Standard Reply (01/08/06)

FOS Letter Recieved (10/08/06)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...