Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Halifax - dodgy default - agreement now terninated, help!


mikexlr8
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4947 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

They have only given you ten days to rectify the default. They must give you 14 days + 3 days for service etc. They have fallen at the first hurdle! Have Halifax sent you a letter to terminate the agreement? J&J Collections are in no position to do that themselves. This termination, because the DN was faulty, will be an unlawful rescission of contract, which means they can't collect anything.

 

More advice from those with better knowledge than me will clarify this, I'm sure, but I think you need to keep your tinder dry, get a CCA request in to J&J, and wait for a response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 227
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Are you sure JJ saying Halifax terminated is enough?

 

Have just googled J&J and it looks like they may be in-house for Halifax, along with Castle and Albion - may be fair enough to say, then, that the account is terminated if that is the case! They'd be hard pushed to claim that as an admin error when it's their own people saying so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant stuff 42 man. In the meantime, the only way a DCA or anyone can add charges like this to an account is if there's a clause allowing it in the original signed contract... what contract? CCA would sort that out, but, as 42man and others of us have said, they've burnt their bridges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Careful... Albion is an in-house DCA I think. Did Albion say the agreement was terminated? If not, then this letter is inappropriate. Can you tell us exactly what Albion's letter said?

 

... and you might want to remove your name from the bottom of your letter!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you've had the dodgy default and the termination notice, then you can follow the route taken by mikexlr8 - it's DCA early Christmas! However, you might want to post the specifics of each letter you've had (or scan them) so we can be absolutely sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh bliss, don't you love letters like that? Keep hold of those letters - they're gold dust.

 

I note that the date of their DN is 21 August. They have clearly issued the TN 14 days after this, possibly thinking 14 days is all you have to wait (except you need to allow another 3 clear days for service). It could be that whoever issued the DN put the wrong date on for the breach to be remedied, but that's just tough!

 

Someone has f***ed up big time at Halifax...

 

Wonder how many of these they have sent out? Two already on ths thread, any more to come? Mods, should this become a sticky so that anyone who has received these can spot it quickly?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
CAB in most cases concerning debt management are ****-poor IMO.

 

CAG is THE place to be and the advice here is a lot more sound, again, IMO.

 

The key to the above argument is that you DO NOT make ANY payment to them after a recission of contract otherwise they can argue you acknowledged the alleged debt.

 

Clear enough? ;-)

 

Dare I...

 

... argue that the payment is a gift, and the account remains rescinded? Can't undo that, surely?

 

In the same way that making a payment on a statute-barred debt does not reactivate it. Once it's dead, it's dead. Norwegian parrot. Michael Palin. Need a bit of legal here...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Was that sound the thud of your jaw hitting the floor, and your pants filling with liquid fear?

 

If they're coming round, ask them to bring the paperwork which shows a legally enforceable debt - it will save them the postage!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...