Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I will annotate the message I sent for the forum.  Sorry, didn't see this straight away...
    • I went back to the area, this photo is taken on entry. My vehicle was parked in the first space on the left.    Would you say there is sufficient signage ? It’s different to the street view as one sign is missing. The sign nearest to where I parked is 2.23m above ground! So even if the car had been reversed parked in front of it, I don’t think it could be seen. PCN PPM.pdf
    • Thank you. I expect that @dx100uk will be along soon to give advice. Meanwhile, I really wonder whether the default date – as being the starting point of the six years – something which has been decided in law. It has always seemed to me to be extremely unfair. According to the limitation act, the six year period begins from the date on which the cause of action accrued. This normally means that the breach of contract occurred. Section 6 of the limitation act says that in terms of loans, the cause of action begins on the date that the debt was "demanded". Over the past two years this has come to mean the date that the default notice was issued – but I have to say I don't find that very satisfactory. If you received demands for payment before then then I don't see why section 6 shouldn't refer to that date. Did you not receive any correspondence at all in 2017/2018? What was the value of the original loan – and how much you pay off? I see that there was some kind of instalment agreement. Tell us about that. See what my colleague @dx100uk says but anyway, if I were you I would send off an SAR immediately both to the claimant and also to the original creditor. It costs you nothing. There is no downside. Get in the post straightaway with some kind of utility bill establishing your identity. You can even include a copy of the claim form as well as proof of your identity
    • £749.69 court fee £70 legal fee £70 total £889.68 MyJar TM.pdf
    • Please read and complete the following posting your responses back here for further advice. Topic title amended.   .     .
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

benefit confusion - advice please


sorrylittlelot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5399 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

I am hoping for some advice.

 

In a nutshell I live with my girlfriend who works 16 hours per week and our 18 month old son.

I started claimg JSA in Nov 2008 due to redundancy, I was receiving this along with housing benefit etc up until June 6th 2009 when I went into hospital for a knee reconstruction, at this point I received ESA and housing benefit.

I am still on ESA, however my council has stopped my payments and say I have been over paid by almost £700 as I have gone from ESA income based to ESA contribution based.

 

My knee is about 80% now so I am looking for a job, my query is whether I should claim ESA or JSA, what will be more beneficial towards me financialy? I'm hoping to get housing benefit as without it I do not have the means to pay the rent.

 

We receive working tax credits, child benefit, and we were receiving council tax benefit and housing benefit.

 

All help glady accepted with many thanks

I'm worse at what I do best and for this gift I feel blessed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did your girlfriend recently start work, or increase her hours to 16 per week? There must be some reason why you moved from income-based ESA to the contributory benefit.

 

In any case, you and your girlfriend could possibly still be entitled to housing benefit and council tax benefit, but you would need to approach the council directly, and claim on the basis of your low income - the process is different now that you're on ESA ©, but you're not disqualified from applying. This would apply whether you were on ESA or JSA.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sorrylittlelot, You should still be able to claim Housing benefit/Council tax unless your Girlfriend is earning more than she should, even though she works just 16 hrs, it's the amount that is taken into account. Jobcentre will be able to tell you what she can earn without it affecting your benefits. In any event you should still be eligible for some help towards HB/CT. If you have a Disability then claim ESA if not then claim JSA neither should make any difference to the level of benefit. If still unsure ring CAB. Hope this helps. Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all,

my GF returned to work on July 1st 2009 working 16 hours per week.

I spoke to the council and they say the government states we should be able to live on £176 per week so my incomings and outgoings for rent leaves a diffrence of £96 and we have a surplus £126 or something a week according to them.

I just don'r see how they work it out, I am still getting exactly the same coming in and going out.

I'm worse at what I do best and for this gift I feel blessed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bit of a clearer post.

 

Myself, my partner and ouy 18 month old son rent a 3 bedrom house, I am on ESA contribution based and my partner works 16 hours a week (began July 1st)

we get all other benefits eg child/working tax.

Today we got a letter saying we owe £800 back to council due to overpayments since my partner started work a month ago.

Is there anything else we can claim?

Will I be better off being on JSA as I am nearly recoverd from my operation and I am looking for work (my sick note runs out tomorrow 28 Aug)

I'm worse at what I do best and for this gift I feel blessed

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are saying that they have overpaid you, then that means you failed to notify them in time that your OH was working.

If you feel that you are ready to go back to work then tell them, otherwise you will only find yourself paying them more money back.

 

Benefits are their for those who need to legitimately claim them because of disability or illness, not as a means of trying to see which benefits you should claim in order to furnish a lavish lifestyle.

 

A three bed house would be the first thing to look at leaving if you need to claim benefits.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Benefits are their for those who need to legitimately claim them because of disability or illness, not as a means of trying to see which benefits you should claim in order to furnish a lavish lifestyle.

 

A three bed house would be the first thing to look at leaving if you need to claim benefits.

 

The OP was made redundant in November and then had an operation on his knee which he is still recovering from.

 

I hardly think that claiming what they are entitled to can be classed as trying to "furnish a lavish lifestyle"

To suggest that because of their unfortunate situation over the last 9-10 months they should give up their home is quite unnecessary.

 

 

sorrylittlelot

 

I'm not sure whether there are any other benefits that you are entitled to but try checking the following link

 

 

entitled to

 

enamae

Please note: I have no qualifications in this area and any advice offered is given in good faith.

 

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/Ombudsman-news/40/40_setoff.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hardly think that claiming what they are entitled to can be classed as trying to "furnish a lavish lifestyle"

 

For anyone that has ever needed to claim benefits, there is absolutely no way you could ever furnish a lavish lifestyle on the pittance you receive.

 

To suggest that because of their unfortunate situation over the last 9-10 months they should give up their home is quite unnecessary.

 

But extremely realistic, and may seem unnecessary to you, but it is fair to say that peoples situations change, some for the worse, and with it you have to make tough choices.

 

Giving up a house which is too large and costs a small fortune to heat/furnish/clean/ and live in, is the obvious choice to leave behind.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...