Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Major Help needed with Cabot and CCJ**WON** Case dismissed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5074 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok i think I have it ready :) or close to.

1. I have the defence.

2. Chronology - list of events since he got the judgment.

3. Judgment for Claimant in default.

4. Case details from Bulk center.

5. Notice of hearing.

6. CRP 18 letter for information with proof of postage and signed for.

7. copies for the Judge and Cabot.

I think that is all I need unless someone can think of anything else :o

Also do i need to take what they sent me of the CRP request?? to show the judge?

IT'S TIME FOR US LITTLE PEOPLE TO FIGHT BACK:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 263
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Gaz,

 

Also do i need to take what they sent me of the CRP request?? to show the judge?

 

There's no harm in taking it but don't offer unless asked. The defence by rights should be enough and if the set aside is awarded ok your dad should ask the judge to give directions that all the stuff he asked for under CPR and hasn't yet received should be produced.... ESPECIALLY the deed of assignment for both alleged agreements!.

 

Also just have a brief note of the reasons why the Set aside is being requested.

 

Spam.:)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Spam,

 

thanks for the help and advise again :)

I will make sure that he asks for directions to all the stuff they haven't supplied and the very important deed of assignment.

As for reasons :-

1. No paperwork received.

2. with no paperwork was unable to file a defence.

I could also add no paperwork received from Cabot (CRP) now and claiming the wrong amount as it includes unfair charges :(

IT'S TIME FOR US LITTLE PEOPLE TO FIGHT BACK:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm guessing you put the set aside application quoting CPR 13.3...

 

Reasons being... Claim form not served... good chance of successful defence.

 

At the hearing.. the judge will have all this but hopefully you will have a copy of your original application... don't worry if not...

 

Basically your dad just has to say he's requesting a set aside of the default judgement under CPR 13.3 as the Papers were not served and he was not given an opportunity to defend himself. He also believes that he has a good chance of successfuly defending the claim.

 

The judge may then ask him what his defence is and away you go.....

 

Spam.:)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry... just make a point of getting it in if you can :) or if the judge asks...

 

Just have a little sheet of paper for your dad with that basic info on so that if the judge asks why are you asking for this set aside he can mention it. As an LIP they can't expect him to know everything and of course he's been doing a lot of research since he applied. ;)

 

Have you contacted the court about going in as a McKenzie friend?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

my heart sank for a minute then :o

I will write it all down for him,

I have spoken to the court who have told me to put it in writing to them but they said it shouldn't be a problem as it will be in the judges chambers as it is only a hearing, so am on my way there in around an hour.

IT'S TIME FOR US LITTLE PEOPLE TO FIGHT BACK:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok.. I'm sure it'll be fine..

 

Any more questions just post them up... I've gotta go to work now so if you don't get replies from anyone else I'll be back later and have a look.

 

Spam.:)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

The directions I have so far:-

• I have made a request by letter CPR 18 Letter for information to Cabot financial and Morgan solicitors.

• So far to date Cabot financial and Morgan Solicitors have failed to provide and prove that any of these documents exist.

• I ask the court to order Cabot Financial and Morgan Solicitors to produce and prove that they hold such documents.

• I also ask the court that the deed of assignment for both alleged agreements be produced and proven that they hold such documents.

• I also ask the court to order Cabot financial and Morgan Solicitors that all proof of postage that they hold be produced and proven.

If i have missed anything please add to the list.

IT'S TIME FOR US LITTLE PEOPLE TO FIGHT BACK:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gaz,

 

Hope you got on ok at the court earlier..

 

I think that if Cabot turn up to oppose the set aside the focus will be on whether or not your dad received the Letter before Action, Claim Form etc. therefore it would be up to your dad to put them to strict proof that the papers were delivered by asking for production of receipts of recorded/special delivery and a signature to say he had received them...

 

If they don't turn up and the hearing goes unopposed then it should be reasonably plain sailing.

 

The next thing is to give a copy of the defence to Judge and once he/she has had a look and asked questions hopefully the set aside will be granted..then ask him/her to request disclosure in his/her directions of the documents that you've listed above..

 

Until you get in there it's difficult to know how the hearing will go and what route it will take. It could be over and done with in a flash, set aside granted, or it could be more involved with lots of questions.. the best thing is be prepared for anything... go in wearing belt and braces and you won't be caught with your trousers down. :roll:

 

Spam. :)

Edited by Spamalot

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got on ok at the court, Wasn't told yes or no but was told the judge had the final say on whether I would be aloud to help.

It will be interesting to see if Cabot turn up on the day :D

The funny thing about them asking them to product the proof that the LBA was sent, is they cant as to date he has never had one :p

IT'S TIME FOR US LITTLE PEOPLE TO FIGHT BACK:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I have changed the Directions a little to include some of the about:-

• I have made a request by letter CPR 18 Letter for information to Cabot financial and Morgan solicitors.

• So far to date Cabot financial and Morgan Solicitors have failed to provide and put under strict proof that any of these documents exist.

• I ask the court to order Cabot Financial and Morgan Solicitors to produce and put under strict proof that they hold such documents.

• I also ask the court that the deed of assignment for both alleged agreements be produced and put under strict proof that they hold such documents.

• I also ask the court to order Cabot financial and Morgan Solicitors be put under Strict proof that all paperwork sent was delivered by asking for production of receipts of recorded/special delivery and a signature to say they have been received.

I think that covers the directions but again if anyone wants to add anything :)

As for questions they might ask, I will get together a list of Q&A that will keep him on track to put them under strict proof of producing documents and proving they sent letters i.e. LBA

IT'S TIME FOR US LITTLE PEOPLE TO FIGHT BACK:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks Ok to me Gaz..

 

You may find that the Judge asks you what you need produced or you may have to wait for a window of opportunity to instigate it. Either way Cabot probably haven't got it anyway..:rolleyes:

 

Just make sure that if the judge asks your dad 'Do you owe the money' your dad says 'NO'

 

 

Spam. :)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will make sure :p

Going into a court and saying you owe the money :mad: is such a bad move :(

 

With what Argos sent they cant have most of the paperwork as Argos didn't have most of the paperwork.

IT'S TIME FOR US LITTLE PEOPLE TO FIGHT BACK:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

just one question I have is what does CPR stand for on the letter sent :o

 

Civil Procedure Rules

 

It is how our justice system is supposed to work;)

 

Google it and you will see!!

 

Beau

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok just one more thing :rolleyes:

I have been looking at the CRP sections 6.9, 13.2 and 13.3 that the judgment should not be set aside because he didnt get the paperwork :( Cabot seem to be trying to go down that road in the witness statement they sent in the paperwork, as they mention them 3 sections in the statement.

I am a bit worried that he gets there and the judge says that he cant use no paperwork as an excuse and rules for them, without looking at the defence of CRP :eek:

i am just worried if it goes that way, is there anything I can do to to make he looks at the defence???

IT'S TIME FOR US LITTLE PEOPLE TO FIGHT BACK:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

cpr 6.9 is only for the service of claim, they must have obtained a certificate of service to get a default judgement. Did they? Is there any mention of it?

If not thats a reason to set aside.

Next, the court will allow a set aside if you have a good prospect of defending the claim. ( CPR12 ). Have you posted up ( typed ) their WS? to see if theres any other bits to pull apart?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gaz,

 

If your dad was going to use 'no paperwork' as the only reason and he had no defence then the judge would likely say no to the set aside.

 

But he is saying he has not been sent any paperwork, therefore he had no opportunity to submit a defence and he has a very good chance of defending the claim successfully... it will be up to the judge but there shouldn't be a problem... if it doesn't go your way, make sure you have leave to appeal his decision because in my opinion it would be a very uninformed judge who would decide aginst your dad in this case.

 

As soon as you get in the room just make sure your dad has everything to hand to give to the judge if he/she asks and the relevant CPR relating to your request/application.... oh and make sure your mobiles switched off..;)

 

Very best of luck again,

 

 

 

Spam.:)

Edited by Spamalot

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Spam bazaar.

 

I think i just had a moment at 3AM that they may try and bulldoze him in the court and the judge not give him a fair chance,

 

Will let you all know later how he gets on :)

IT'S TIME FOR US LITTLE PEOPLE TO FIGHT BACK:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...