Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So as I stated, I posted my letter off but over 2 weeks later I've had a visit from one of their reps. I didn't indulge him in any conversation, and I just stated that any such debts are statute-barred and closed the door on him. I was hoping they'd take notice of the letter. Where do I go from here? Thanks
    • I apologise if I was being unclear. Where it currently stands is that they will have it repair, placing scaffolding in our garden for 5 days. They have moved fast, but we will still have to postpone our contractors, meaning, we won't necessarily have the work done in time for the wedding and therefore will incur additional expenses for either a marquee or a wedding venue. They are vehemently against having any kind of liability in any regard but continue repeating that they are legally entitled to use our garden for their repairs (I believe this is true unless the work can be carried out using a cherry picker). The neighbour seems either indifferent or oblivious to the fact they can't reach all of the side of the roof from the space where they can place the scaffolding. They have asked their roofer of choice about using a cherry picker but the roofer has said it wasn't possible. It's not clear whether the roofer doesn't want to use a cherry picker or whether there is an issue with it. They have told us it is a problem that we are installing a gazebo as it will prevent them to access their roof from our garden in the future?!?  
    • Couldn't agree more, really wanted a true ruling on this just for the knowledge but pretty sure the Judge made some decisions today that he didn't need to?.. maybe they all go this way on the day? We hear back so few post court dates I'm not sure. Each Judge has some level of discretion. Their sol was another Junior not even working at their Firm, so couldn't speak directly for them! that was fortunate I think because if she would have rejected in court better, she might have  been able to force ruling, we are at that point!, everybody there!!, Judge basically said openly that he can see everything for Judgement!!!  but she just said "I can speak to the claimant and find out!" - creating the opportunity for me to accept. I really think the Judge did me a favor today by saying it without saying it. Knowing the rep for the sol couldn't really speak to the idea in the moment. Been to court twice in a fortnight, on both occasions heard 4 times with others and both of my claims, the clerk mention to one or both parties "Letting the Judge know if you want to have a quick chat with each other"! So, it appears there's an expectation of the court that there is one last attempt at settling before going through the door. So, not a Sol tactic, just Court process!. Judge was not happy we hadn't tried to settle outside! We couldn't because she went to the loo and the Judge called us in 10 minutes early! - another reason to stand down to allow that conv to happen. Stars aligned there for me I think. But yeh, if the sol themselves, or someone who can make decisions on the case were in court, I would have received a Judgement against today I think. She was an 'advocate'.. if I recall her intro to me correctly.. So verbal arguments can throw spanners in Court because Plinks dogs outsource their work and send a Junior advocate.
    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Support Your Bailiff/high Court Enforcement Officer


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6447 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

As an enforcement officer I believe that we have a very important role within society .. Whilst fully supporting the need to ensure that any form of enforcement is properly regulated one must in the first instance as the question

Why do we need to have any form of enforcement ? Be it relating to debt , fines , taxes , food hygiene, behaviour etc . You can answer the question yourselves

The main thread which appears to be prevalent on many of the boards is that people who do my job are bullies with a badge .

As an experienced officer I can categorically state that in the last 10years the industry has changed substantially -- For the better

Yes we still have some rogue elements ( which industry doesn't) -- but our clients be they the courts or commerce soon identity operations which are likely to tarnish their reputation.

Consider this -- A visit by an enforcement officer is a last resort --- If you ignore previous notifications -- its your own fault -- Why should other people end up paying for your inablity to address a problem of your own making .

I am not saying that our circumstances don't change which cause us problems be it loss of job , matrimonial or health which are mainly out of our control . What I am saying is don't bury your head in the sand --- If you are ill you go to the doctor -- If you have money problems contact one of the many advice agencies ---

PS -- I also do voluntary work for a groop of Advice Agencies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi!

 

Well, apart from a quite antagonistic title to your thread, I think you have come across pretty well for your opening post. Unfortunately Bailiffs / Enforcement Officers will always be tarred with the bad brush simply because people have had - and continue to have - bad experiences with them....a bit like Social Services! And people with money problems don't want to face up to it - not because they don't want to, but just that they are scared as I am sure you can appreciate as you work with advice agencies. So when they end up with one of the 'rogue elements' of your industry knocking on their door it is no wonder you have a bad name.

 

Hopefully as an experienced enforcement officer you will be able to help out occasionally if someone is having difficulty with a bailiff - we do have a couple of bailiffs registered who have posted in the past and their help has been useful.

 

(And if you have any bank charges you want to claim back, you're in the right place ;) )

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Zooman

May I ask what you are, I am thinking from you title High Court Enforcement. And if that is the case face it you are tarred with the brush of the Certified Bailiffs.

 

As a footer I prepared papers for a costs hearing against a High Court Enforcement officer that charged 1,700 on collecting a debt that had transferred up that was for 1,300 they settled within 2 days of be served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Collector,

Can I ask a couple of questions?

I had a creep called Paul who bought a car off me he, because I knew him I let him pay weekly, he never paid the full amout so I took him to court, he never replied so I had a CCJ against him, I then paid extra & had a bailif call on him, the bailif was crap & only managed to get £50.00 off him, then gave up, I chased them & in the end I gave up, he still owes me £280.00.

I had another creep called Lewie who I took to court & won he owes me £1,500.00 & this time I got the CCJ but havn't bothered with the bailif how do I get this money off the 2 creeps?

Regards,

Chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am pretty angry but I'll keep this civil as I wouldn't be so presumptious to generalise as you have...... I will only speak about my own personal experience......

 

Your quote "A visit by an enforcement officer is a last resort --- If you ignore previous notifications -- its your own fault -- Why should other people end up paying for your inablity to address a problem of your own making ."

 

 

My parking ticket was in dispute.........There may be a question of validity!

I received NO replies from the said Council to my plees for them to rethink their issuing of the ticket in the first place.

My plees were ignored.

I am a loan parent with 3 children and the youngest is disabled.

I am not going in to my persoanl situation but life's been very tough for a long time now, with constant visits to clinics and hospitals and together with nursing my disabled Mum too, who sadly died 2 days before my youngest daughter's first birthday........I've been on my knees more times than I care to remember and to top it all with the bank and their charges etc....spiralling my financial situation into the deepest void ever.............sometimes it's all you can do to keep your own head above water..fight for your disabled child's rights and pray that they get through whatever they're in hospital for this time.....................

Don't make judgement mate !

You walk a mile in my shoes and show me how you'd cope.

And don't bother coming back with any smart answers or suggestions what I should or shouldn't be doing.... I am now amongst friends on here, who look out for me and I value their "real" solutions and support.

Before you come on here making sweeping generalisations about people who find themselves in unfortunate financial situations...take a look around you and really think about people'es situations in life.....we're not all perfect..maybe not even you !

 

Freebird.....don't get me started....

1/6/06 request charges

16/6/06 received charges

18/6/06 first request for refund

3/7/06 "No" letter from bank

13/7/06 LBA

7/08/06 handed claim to court

10/8/06 court stamped as date of issue

24/8/06 deemed to be served

25/8/06 Sechiari filed acknowledgement of service

6/9/06 defence served

9/9/06 copy of defence and AQ received by me

25/9/06 deadline for AQ submission

25/9/06 call Sechiari confirm safe receipt of my AQ

26/9/06 received copy AQ from Sechiari

29/9/06 letter to SCM to say "you want 1 month to settle, so settle"

18/10/06 after "strained communications"and how !

verbal offer of full settlement with conditions

communications rejecting conditions from me

5/11/06 received letter offering settlement with conditions

7/11/06 sent fax rejecting conditions etc

14/11/06 unconditional settlement in bank and how !;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firebird --

 

Sorry you took umbridge -- but I stand by my comments and observations

The issue you have is not with the Bailiff but with the person/organisation that took the action against you

As far as presumption is concerned I never presume and if you read my original post again -- I hope you will agree

 

PS -- I didn't sign up to be antagonistic but to try to bring a different view to the debate --

Link to post
Share on other sites

and I stand by my post, this was your generalistic quote,

 

"Your quote "A visit by an enforcement officer is a last resort --- If you ignore previous notifications -- its your own fault -- Why should other people end up paying for your inablity to address a problem of your own making ."

 

 

 

Umbridge didn't come to mind.......you making presumptions , did.......

 

And I wasn't aware we were all in a debate......

 

this is a consumer action group, where we as consumers can of course debate with each other, but usually we are giving each other some support, and or maybe advice and direction as to the best course of action to help each other out of our mis- fortunate situations.

Judgemental comments and critisim isn't only unhelpful but it's down right tactless when some of us on here are crying our for help and possibly at our most vulrernable, bearing our souls to complete strangers for their help !

 

Just have a bit more tact mate and your input may be welcomed if in fact you are here to offer advice and support rather than judgemental comments and general put downs.

 

Freebird.....not umbridged just on to ya!

1/6/06 request charges

16/6/06 received charges

18/6/06 first request for refund

3/7/06 "No" letter from bank

13/7/06 LBA

7/08/06 handed claim to court

10/8/06 court stamped as date of issue

24/8/06 deemed to be served

25/8/06 Sechiari filed acknowledgement of service

6/9/06 defence served

9/9/06 copy of defence and AQ received by me

25/9/06 deadline for AQ submission

25/9/06 call Sechiari confirm safe receipt of my AQ

26/9/06 received copy AQ from Sechiari

29/9/06 letter to SCM to say "you want 1 month to settle, so settle"

18/10/06 after "strained communications"and how !

verbal offer of full settlement with conditions

communications rejecting conditions from me

5/11/06 received letter offering settlement with conditions

7/11/06 sent fax rejecting conditions etc

14/11/06 unconditional settlement in bank and how !;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

and by the way I actually do have issues with the bailiff and the Council, but that's my business

 

Freebird

1/6/06 request charges

16/6/06 received charges

18/6/06 first request for refund

3/7/06 "No" letter from bank

13/7/06 LBA

7/08/06 handed claim to court

10/8/06 court stamped as date of issue

24/8/06 deemed to be served

25/8/06 Sechiari filed acknowledgement of service

6/9/06 defence served

9/9/06 copy of defence and AQ received by me

25/9/06 deadline for AQ submission

25/9/06 call Sechiari confirm safe receipt of my AQ

26/9/06 received copy AQ from Sechiari

29/9/06 letter to SCM to say "you want 1 month to settle, so settle"

18/10/06 after "strained communications"and how !

verbal offer of full settlement with conditions

communications rejecting conditions from me

5/11/06 received letter offering settlement with conditions

7/11/06 sent fax rejecting conditions etc

14/11/06 unconditional settlement in bank and how !;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very well put free bird:)

DONT FORGET TO DONATE TO THIS SITE WHEN YOU WIN THANKYOU

If you dont it wont be here:x

 

Let battle commence!!!!!:mad:

All advice and opinions given by people on this site are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, please seek qualified professional legal Help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's have a look at Zooman's post again. Most of the time we don't have a problem with the Court Bailiffs. Court Bailiffs are professional and helpful beings for the most part.

 

No, the problem arises from Certified Bailiffs, who are private companies collecting debts which have not necessarily been enforced by a Court. These are the ones who cause problems for the most part... because they are antagonistic, bullying boors.

 

HOWEVER...

 

I do agree that Collector could have been more tactful; people don't "ignore" debt and financial problems. What happens is, their brain closes off that part of life because it's too big to cope with. That part of their head simply shuts down and refuses to acknowledge that there is a problem. This isn't a choice; it's a protective, instinctive response - there are many psychiatric studies out there of just such behaviour. So - it's not "their own fault"... and if organisations did not indulge in irresponsible lending in the first place, and then levy unlawful punitive charges against people when they couldn't pay their debts, there would not be a problem; more people would save instead of borrowing, and there would be less suicides, less debt and generally a better place to live.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
As an enforcement officer I believe that we have a very important role within society .. Whilst fully supporting the need to ensure that any form of enforcement is properly regulated one must in the first instance as the question

Why do we need to have any form of enforcement ? Be it relating to debt , fines , taxes , food hygiene, behaviour etc . You can answer the question yourselves

The main thread which appears to be prevalent on many of the boards is that people who do my job are bullies with a badge .

As an experienced officer I can categorically state that in the last 10years the industry has changed substantially -- For the better

Yes we still have some rogue elements ( which industry doesn't) -- but our clients be they the courts or commerce soon identity operations which are likely to tarnish their reputation.

Consider this -- A visit by an enforcement officer is a last resort --- If you ignore previous notifications -- its your own fault -- Why should other people end up paying for your inablity to address a problem of your own making .

I am not saying that our circumstances don't change which cause us problems be it loss of job , matrimonial or health which are mainly out of our control . What I am saying is don't bury your head in the sand --- If you are ill you go to the doctor -- If you have money problems contact one of the many advice agencies ---

PS -- I also do voluntary work for a groop of Advice Agencies

Hi

 

I have been reading the forum for sometimes now but never bothered to register. however upon reading yours i felt the urge to reply to your post.

 

In many years of working with bailiffs i can conclude that the bailiffs are the **** of the earth. they have no feelings and they are the lowests of creation. please spare me with your JIgJO junk

the best way to enforce the fines debts etc is not through the bailiffs but we need a proper regulations and better fairer enforcements. bailiffs are the core cause of the UK debts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...