Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

eviesmummy1984 v Brighthouse


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5368 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please please help me, i am new to this website so not sure if i am posting this on the correct page. I am 4 weeks behind on my brighthouse payments as i have been made redundant.

I am being bombarded with calls, 30 calls a day, and am ignoring the calls. I know this isn't the right way to go about it, but to tell the truth i am frightened of the manager of my local store and feel very threatened. Previously i have missed the odd week or so and he has been really nasty to me.

I have about 1 year left on my 3 year agreement and my payments are 30 per week. I have since moved address and not told the store i have moved.

I do want to sort this out, i am scared that they will come and smash my door down and take my goods. I cannot pay my arrears until i recieve my redundancy payment, which will be in about a month.

Please help me as to where i stand with them.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You really do need to tell them you have moved as the goods still belong to them. Trust me, they cannot come to you house and smash your door down - in fact they have no rights to come to your house at all. There are a couple of letters you can send to them - one to stop the telephone calls, and the other to tell them that they are not to come to your house. Keep a copy of the no visits letter by your door, to give to them if they do come round. Just open the door (or letterbox), give it to them, and tell them to sod off. If they refuse to leave, you can call the police (non-emergency) and tell them you are being threatened by someone at your front door and they are refusing to leave!

 

-HARASSMENT WARNING-

 

 

WARNING;PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997;

 

 

WARNING; COMMUNICATIONS ACT 2003, S127.

 

 

TELEPHONE NUMBER

 

 

Re: Harassment by telephone

 

 

 

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXXXXX

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls.

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

and the "no visits" letter:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account Ref xxxx

 

Please be advised that I will only communicate with you in writing.

Should it be your intention to arrange a "doorstep call", please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that

 

I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Ok, now for your arrears. Brighthouse are not the most helpful of companies when it comes to this. They do not seem to understand that if you cannot make one weeks payment, you have no way of finding 2 weeks worth in order to catch up. The OFT clearly states in their guidelines that it is unfair to demand more than a person can realistically pay (which of course BH are doing). No doubt they are now telling you that you have to pay 5 weeks payments in order to catch up.

 

You have one of two options - you can either send a letter, recorded delivery, to both the head office and your branch, outlining your situation - i.e - you will make the payments up in full when you receive your redundancy pay OR you could ask them to re-write your agreements, meaning they put the arrears to the end, and you effectively start paying them the normal weekly amount. Be careful if you decide to do this route as they can sometimes "forget" to include all previous payments made towards the item, therefore re-setting your repossesion rights. There is a letter you can take with you, to get the manager to sign, should you wish to do this - this would ensure that your rights remain intact.

 

Also, I would just add that as you have clearly paid more than 2/3rds off your agreements, BH would need to obtain a court order to cease your goods. They would need a court order to gain access to your property as well - Brighthouse, rarely, if ever, take anyone to court.

 

You really need to start your own thread, but as I have replied here, I am going to ask the Site Team if they can move your post and mine to a new thread for you.

 

I apologise for being so long in replying.....Please try to remain calm - I will answer any questions you have.

Edited by clemma
Link to post
Share on other sites

oh i see lol!

 

eviesmummy, you must get in contact with the store as soon as possible if this is to be resolved. I understand that you may feel threatened by the manager, however this cant be a reason not make the remaining payments on your account, please phone the store and speak to one of the account reps and tell them how you feel about the manager they should be able to help.

Dont forget that it is in the stores interest to have this issue resolved too.

The field account reps will absolutely not bash your door down.

I cant stress enough hows important it is to call the store asap and be completely honest with them, if you look at it from the stores point of view at the moment you must look to hem like you have "skipped" and have no intention of paying, im sure this is not the case?

perhaps call the customer care line that is listed on your agreement (on the page where you sign all the initials) and explain how you feel to them about approaching the manager but that you want the issue resolved? They will refer your call back to the store manager to deal with, but your call will be logged and the manager must report back to he careline team when things are resolved - so again it wil be in his interest to sort out the problem.

Do not be threatened, take the matter in hand, you will feel better once it is resolved.

Do not agree to any item being taken back if that is not what you want and you can afford your normal weekly payment - if you cant then it may be worth doing a pick up and hold on a less essential item until you get back on your feet. The store may be able to re-write your account.There are many ways of helping but you must take the frist step and contact the store.

good luck x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmmm - my advice has always been to do everything in writing - especially with Brighthouse (whom I have had many, many dealings with). There is no point in phoning again, to just be bullied and intimidated AGAIN. Write to Head Office (or email) and send a copy to the store. That way, you can put your say across without interruption.

 

Sorry sunshine, but I do not agree with your view of Brighthouse "getting the issue resolved". Their way is to make you pay extortionate amounts in one go, as they will accept no less.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please please help me, i am new to this website so not sure if i am posting this on the correct page. I am 4 weeks behind on my brighthouse payments as i have been made redundant.

I am being bombarded with calls, 30 calls a day, and am ignoring the calls. I know this isn't the right way to go about it, but to tell the truth i am frightened of the manager of my local store and feel very threatened. Previously i have missed the odd week or so and he has been really nasty to me.

I have about 1 year left on my 3 year agreement and my payments are 30 per week. I have since moved address and not told the store i have moved.

I do want to sort this out, i am scared that they will come and smash my door down and take my goods. I cannot pay my arrears until i recieve my redundancy payment, which will be in about a month.

Please help me as to where i stand with them.

Thanks

any news on this eviesmummy? x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Everyone,

I am really stuck as to what to do....i am too scared to speak to the store as i know they will shout and bully me....i am willing to make payments, but cannot afford to pay the arrears, but as i have left it so long i don't think they will do a rewrite for me.

I worked out i have paid 3000 quid so far for a tv that is worth 1000 quid, surely i am within my rights to keep the tv, provided the payments are sorted and i can make my normal payment....i'm so frightened, all this money will be lost?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Brighthouse may not be easy to deal with, but you seem to have got your situation blown a little out of proportion in your own mind. In all seriousness do you think they really would be stupid enough to get physical with you? Break into your home??

 

Have you done anything to help the situation? You have come on here for advice and we have done our best with you - have you sent any of the letters Clemma suggested at least? You must be 2 months behind by now, I dont think the store would expect you to pay £300 in one go esp if you have been laid off! So perhaps they would consider a rewrite after all? The only way to find out is to speak to them and the only person who can do that is you.

 

I Dont really know what else i can say to you evies mummy, im not tryin to be mean here but the bottom line is that the goods need to be paid for whether you are worried about speaking to your store or not - otherwise it is theft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmmm - sunshine, you have obviously never dealt with Brighthouse:

 

In all seriousness do you think they really would be stupid enough to get physical with you? Break into your home??

 

They threaten this - I KNOW they do as I have been on the receiving end of it. Before I knew any better I believed them - why would Brighthouse lie? So coming on here and saying this does NOT help someone who is absolutely terrified.

 

The only way to find out is to speak to them and the only person who can do that is you.

 

Again, DO NOT phone them. Send the letters I have posted on here earlier - that way they cannot threaten you. Phoning them is a big no-no sunshine.

 

im not tryin to be mean here but the bottom line is that the goods need to be paid for whether you are worried about speaking to your store or not - otherwise it is theft

 

The goods do need paying for - but on the OP's terms NOT Brighthouse. As for stating it's theft - that is a strong accusation and would only be true IF the OP was not trying to resolve this/had taken out an agreement with the intention of never paying/sold the goods. If Brighthouse wanted they could take this to court to repossess the goods. We all know BH will not do this.

 

Eviesmummy - send the letters, ask them in writing for a re-write on your agreement stating WHY you are having difficulty in making the payments. If they demand the £300+ then tell them they are in breach of OFT guidelines (Unfair Business Practices)- namely:

 

Physical/Psycological Harrassment:

2.6 examples of unfair practice are as follows:

a - contacting debtors at unreasonable times and at unreasonable intervals

f - pressurising debtors to pay in full, in unreasonably large instalments, or increase payments when they are unable to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have indeed have had many dealings with Brighthouse and other debt companies.

 

eviesmummy - Im sorry if i sound heartless in my post, im sorry you are feeling scared, truly. I have been in a similar situation a few yrs ago with a few companies (some of which were really nasty scotcall, and surprisingly Lloyds tsb!) after a marriage breakup, I stuck my head in the sand and was afraid to call the companies much like yourself. Situations escalated and the longer i left it the worse it got - until i finally but the bullet and phoned all of the companies in one morning - I was so nervous i thought i was going to pass out! But I started the ball rolling to get it all in order - it was a weight off!! I sound heartless because thats what you need to do however hard it may seem - you need to cut off your emotions!

Clemma I am entitled to my oppinion, this forum is very much dominated by you and you often give good sound advice however your word is not gospel and not always completely correct. You won your battle and thats great but that doesnt mean that nobody elses thoughts and advice matter but your own!

 

Some Brighthouse employees may very well "threaten" etc - but do they ACTUALLY ever do this? Not as far as I am aware. Its no good to wrap evies mummy in cotton wool here she needs to be encouraged to be strong. Companies are not interested in what they would most probably call "a sob story" they are interested in facts - give them the facts - i can afford £xx, i am offering £xx and this is an income and expendature form drawn up with the C.A.B. to show this is true. iF YOU REFUSE THIS PAYMENT THEN THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE BUT TO GO TO COURT - we all know BH doesnt do court!!

 

In my mind - goods arent paid for - they are stolen! I dont think that is what eveies mummy is intending to do, however sticking her head in the sand wont resolve anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please please help me, i am new to this website so not sure if i am posting this on the correct page. I am 4 weeks behind on my brighthouse payments as i have been made redundant.

I am being bombarded with calls, 30 calls a day, and am ignoring the calls. I know this isn't the right way to go about it, but to tell the truth i am frightened of the manager of my local store and feel very threatened. Previously i have missed the odd week or so and he has been really nasty to me.

I have about 1 year left on my 3 year agreement and my payments are 30 per week. I have since moved address and not told the store i have moved.

I do want to sort this out, i am scared that they will come and smash my door down and take my goods. I cannot pay my arrears until i recieve my redundancy payment, which will be in about a month.

Please help me as to where i stand with them.

Thanks

 

 

 

hi ive been in similar situation and ive just this minute got of the phone to brighthouse,who have offered to give me 2weeks grace,which trust me i was not expecting,they say they will bridge my account for me in 2weeks and have took off the insurance to help lower the payments which is a great help,i hope you get somewhere with them,but i think not answering there calls will just make them ring more,thats prob why there apr is so high,with all the calls the make :rolleyes:,try not get stressed over them as there as important as the window cleaner is knocking at the door,i know this is easier said then done but its just not worth the stress,good luck to you with bh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...