Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Administration issues after recent treatment


Highchiefolaf
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5439 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I have been having a few problems with some of the administration / care of my patient notes etc after a recent day surgery procedure i had.

 

I will detail the issues below, and some further advise would be helpful:

 

I was recently diagnosed as suffering from carpal tunnel syndrome in my right hand (it's fun typing this with one hand!!) and chose to use a hospital about 20 miles from me using the choose and book service as they could do the procedure a heck of a lot quicker than my local hospital.

 

The hospital in question have an NHS treatment centre there, which is run by an outsource company on behalf of the NHS.

 

I had my first appointment with the consultant there, and was referred to a nearby private hospital for a nerve conduction study. I attended this appointment a week later and was told to await the results and a further appointment at the treatment centre.

 

I was given an appointment a week later, and attended. I was told that it had been decided surgery was required (carpal tunnel release), and the usual pre-op tests were completed. I had a number of questions regarding the surgery, however I was told that i was unable to see a doctor / consultant that day, and would have to ask on the day of the procedure. I then proceeded to book in for the procedure around 10 days later

 

On the 29th may, I attended the treatment centre for the procedure, and was told I was the down on the surgeons list to go down first. They completed the normal checks / paperwork etc. This is when the problems began. the surgeon came round and asked why I had not had a nerve conduction study which surprised me slightly. I informed him I had, and gave details of this. He then said my notes gave no indication I had been referred for the conduction study. I had to give them full details of what had happened etc etc and they tried to track the results down. They finally managed to track them down and the procedure happened 3 hours later. Annoying, but no biggie, these things happen. I found it very difficult for me to get my questions answered, and it took a lot of pressing from me for this to happen, but I still was'nt entirely satisfied.

 

I was told an appointment would be sent to me in the post for the dressing to be changed and this duely arrived.

 

I attended the appointment on tues 2nd june at 5pm. It got to 5:15 and I hadn't been seen yet, so had a quick word with the receptionist and she said I was next to be seen by the nurse. I continued waiting till 5:40 and was starting to get worried. I went and saw the receptionist again and she said I should have been seen by now and chased it up with the nurse. She then came out and said she thought I had been a no show, and they lose had lost the tracking tickets they use for patients which indicated I was there! I was Annoyed now, but bit my tongue, and got her to change my dressing. I then went back to the reception area to book the appointment for the stitches to be removed. I was told that their systems were down, but they would book me in for wednesday 10th June and send a letter out in the post.

 

It came to monday just gone and I had not received anything, so I gave them a call first thing. I was asked to give my details and they would call me back. It got to 4:30 in the afternoon and I had still not been called, so I called back. They tried to transfer me to outpatients 3 times but twice is just kept ringing, then the third just cut off.

 

I called back first thing yesterday morning, was transferred to outpatients again and got the option to leave a voice mail, which I did. I asked the lassy who I first spoke to why no one had contacted me back, and she assured me that the message had been passed on. It got to 3pm and I still had not been contacted back so I called them Again. I was then told that an appointment had been made for me for this friday, but no one had given me the simple courtesy of calling me and letting me know!! She also informed me that an appointment for wed 10th had never been made.

 

As you can see, there has been a number of administrative cock up's along the line here, and it seems their processes are pretty poor. My concern is that this could happen to other people as well. I have been lucky that my procedure was simple.

 

I will add that the actual patient care I received was top notch, and I have no issues with that whatsoever.

 

What are the next steps I should take? My main aim is for them to acknowledge their shortfalls in this case and give some kind of assurances that they will review their processes to ensure these things don't happen again.

 

Thanks for reading, any comments or advice are appreciated

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting the NHS management/administrators to acknowledge any kind of error and correct it for the next patient, will be a tough call, but I agree you should try.

 

You should write a letter outlining your points to PALS (although I would be more tempted to address it to the Chief Exec with a CC to PALS).

 

They will in turn 'investigate' and then send you a letter thanking you for your feedback and probably inform you that they have 'improved procedures.'

 

I doubt they will do the first properly and are unlikely to do do the second at all. Such failures will merely confirm to our NHS the need for a super computer containing all of medical records.

 

With the NHS likely to outsource more in the future, it's a worry. We owe it to others to make the effort to improve the system and that can only be driven by the consumer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response Sali

 

I spoke to them earlier today, and they advised I should send me complaint through to the general manager for the unit. Bearing in mind that it's run through an outsourcer, should I send it for the attention of the gen manager, or should I bypass them and go straight to the trust instead?

 

Ta

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would address it to the Chief Exec of the Trust, with CC to the general manager of the Unit. You will probably get a response from the Chief Exec to say that the matter has been re-assigned, but I suppose, at least your feedback is in their system.

 

I have a real issue with the NHS complaints procedures. I had always thought that if you addressed a complaint about patient care to the Modern Matron, Ward Sister, Consultant, Chief Exec, Pals, whoever, then they would all be accumulated in one location, along with everyone elses. This way patterns and failures would surely emerge. So, if many people were complaining on the same subject, a little lightbulb would go on in the hospital managements' minds to address it immediately for the benefit of the patient. This evidence could also then be provided to an auditor. Neither happen and you have to wonder if this is because they are just bad administrators who do not want to learn and improve or there is a more sinister motive to deny and hide issues that would effect their status.

 

I passionately believe that we need to separate the complaints system from the hospital and staff it with people who have some medical knowledge and wit to act on failures and mistakes early. Only this will stop terrible cases like Stafford recurring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...