Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • oh well i wonder what new fake documents they have made up then...for them to try this.... just to check nothing funky like Link have filed an n244 to lift the stay and strike out her defence....she hasnt moved since last court comms has she?   is this an n24? bit unusual for a 13mts stay to just be lifted... has she not received anything from link/kearns in the last fw weeks like a docs bundle? bit like this thread... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466576-lc-assetlinkkearns-claim-form-2-mbna-cc/?do=findComment&comment=5256397  
    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Have I got a criminal record?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5415 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was very stupid and altered a train ticket to avoid paying. I admit what I did and regret it now. I had hoped it had gone away but rather obviously it has caught up with me. I will pay the fine as I am supposed to but my question is does this mean that I now have a criminal record?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the fine is from the train company,you will not have a record as the police will not have been involved.

 

That is not strictly true.

 

If the case was brought before a Magistrates Court and a conviction recorded by the Bench, then there is a record which can be put onto the PNC.

 

Direct involvement of the Police is not required to bring a prosecution.

 

Much depends on where the case was heard and who brought the prosecution and how the Summons application was made.

 

There are a number of prosecution units across the country, some are part of the TOC establishment and some are agents who act on behalf of the various TOCs

Edited by Old-CodJA
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
It is pretty easy really - if the police were called and you were detained, processed etc. etc. and went to court, found guilty THEN yes.. otherwise no.

 

Sorry, but that is not true. The Police do NOT have to be involved at the time of the offence at all.

 

A good example in other walks of life is the RSPCA, who bring private prosecutions and which result in criminal records if successful. The same applies to the Rail Companies.

 

These cases are heard in what are known as non-CPS Court lists.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might find it helpful to contact nacro (Nacro - changing lives, reducing crime), following the link to spent convictions etc. as they are experts in this field. If a conviction is recorded ( and it may not be if the offence is categorised as "non recordable") they can advise you how long it stays on your record and how long you need to declare it as a conviction.

 

The best of luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am still awaiting contact from Southeastern rail when I had to rush home urgently (didn't buy a ticket) and was caught. As I'm in a similar sort of situation to the gentleman above I wondered if anyone could help me out. I was given a witness statement, I had no means to pay a fine or pay for a ticket. What should I expect? Although a large fine would be quite damaging, it avoids hassle. However the inspector who practially pushed me around because he didn't believe I was who I said I was (despite me showing him proof of address and NI number through my payslip) said very threateningly "you're going to court mate" . So yes, very worried and wondered if there is anything I can do in the mean time, i.e. be proactive about finding out what will happen next. The incident happened on 12th May and I haven't heard anything from them. Please could you help me regarding this as I already posted a thread about 3 weeks ago to no reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I had no means to pay a fine or pay for a ticket. What should I expect?

 

I am sorry if this isn't the reply you might have hoped for, but I have to say that the decision for any prosecutor is very clear deciding the answer to your query.

 

Given the quote highlighted above is from your own statement, I think that this should be borne in mind when considering how this incident came about and what you might expect to happen now.

 

The legislation is absolutely clear in this situation.

 

Any person, who has neither a valid ticket, nor the means to pay the fare due on demand, has no right to board any train.

 

You should expect to receive a Summons

Link to post
Share on other sites

I regret that it is not possible to say how long this will take other to advise that the rail company must lay the information with the Court office within 6 months of the incident

 

If they fail to do so the case cannot be heard in a Magistrates Court although in some cases they could at least theoretically go for a civil debt process in a County Court that can be heard up to two years after the incident. In my experience that is a very rare occurrence and almost all cases go before a Magistrates court

 

All of that means that it can take as much as 8 months from date of 'offence' to date of Magistrates Court hearing, but in practice it is usually much quicker than that

 

I'd say that 3 to 4 months is not uncommon.

Edited by Old-CodJA
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I regret that it is not possible to say how long this will take other to advise that the rail company must lay the information with the Court office within 6 months of the incident

 

If they fail to do so the case cannot be heard in a Magistrates Court although in some cases they could at least theoretically go for a civil debt process in a County Court that can be heard up to two years after the incident. In my experience that is a very rare occurrence and almost all cases go before a Magistrates court

 

All of that means that it can take as much as 8 months from date of 'offence' to date of Magistrates Court hearing, but in practice it is usually much quicker than that

 

I'd say that 3 to 4 months is not uncommon.

 

 

Just an update.

 

I consulted my solicitor on this, once I'd received the summons. She sent them a letter explaining the fact that I hadn't done it before, was co-operative and was very sorry, and now they've agreed to drop all charges. So I have to pay £127.40 fine, and that's it, no criminal record, no trial.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update.

 

I consulted my solicitor on this, once I'd received the summons. She sent them a letter explaining the fact that I hadn't done it before, was co-operative and was very sorry, and now they've agreed to drop all charges. So I have to pay £127.40 fine, and that's it, no criminal record, no trial.

 

Who did your solicitor send the letter to? Was it to the court or the railway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update.

 

I consulted my solicitor on this, once I'd received the summons. She sent them a letter explaining the fact that I hadn't done it before, was co-operative and was very sorry, and now they've agreed to drop all charges. So I have to pay £127.40 fine, and that's it, no criminal record, no trial.

 

Very very lucky.

Fraud is seldom dealt with out of court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update.

 

I consulted my solicitor on this, once I'd received the summons. She sent them a letter explaining the fact that I hadn't done it before, was co-operative and was very sorry, and now they've agreed to drop all charges. So I have to pay £127.40 fine, and that's it, no criminal record, no trial.

 

Yes, I agree with SRPO, you have been very lucky and of course this kind of settlement can only be achieved by writing to the rail company.

 

A minor point perhaps and maybe just semantics, but it is wrong to say you have a 'fine' to pay.

 

It is an 'agreed settlement', not a 'fine'. Only the Court can impose fines in these cases.

 

Of course you also have your solicitor's bill to pay, so the true cost is considerably higher than the £127 you quote, but at least you have avoided a conviction..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies, of course you're right on all points. I accept that I was very lucky, but I though that any chance (no matter how small) was worth taking when it came to try and not get a criminal record.

 

An agreed settlement+my solicitors invoice is indeed quite a large sum, and one which has put a dent in my finances. However I'd rather have that than get a criminal record for such a petty, stupid moment of judgement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...