Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
    • DX, worth mentioning? I take it that you refer to after ,65 loan is written off clause. I thought that after the problems I had at deferment (/no proof of income satisfied them, and I could not afford an accountant) after they stopped pestering that they had decided that the age related clause  had kicked in. As I said, its time to hit back with SB letter.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Just starting our - CCA requests help etc


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4828 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I may not be the sharpest tool in the box, but I would suggest that you send something along the lines of the following. I cobbled it together from templates and the information you've provided Basil.

 

Oh, and I'd make sure that the more knowledgeable here check that what I've put is okay before sending it!

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account In Dispute

 

Ref:

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xx and the (photocopied?) documents, the contents of which have been duly noted.

 

Subsequent to the above, in all good faith I believe the "agreement" sent to be a reconstituted copy, rather than the original as I requested in my letter of xx/xx/xx.

This is clearly in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 s77/8 where you are required by law to furnish me with a true copy of the Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

 

I now require you to disclose, in full, the documents from which you reconstituted this "agreement".

Should you refuse to comply, you should provide me with your reasoning for doing so.

 

If you are unable to confirm in writing within x days of the date of this letter that you do indeed hold an original copy of the alleged Consumer Credit Agreement and furnish me with such, including true copies of any documents that are referred to therein, you will be in breach of OFT guidelines and the above account will remain in dispute.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take any action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

The lack of a true credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies:

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

 

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

I reserve the right to report any actions to the contrary to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

 

If you are unable to furnish me with the requested documents, you should inform me of such in writing, acknowledge that this matter is now closed and that you will not contact me again.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter and await your written response.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Good luck mate! :D

 

 

Edited by Halibutt
  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks HS. And you're very welcome Basil, I didn't think it was laziness for one minute mate. I'm just happy to try to give back to this community and as I'm not working and in receipt of benefits, I have the time to do so! ;)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From Harassed Senior's advice, I would suggest that the letter is worded to read:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

Account In Dispute

Ref:

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xx and the (photocopied?) documents, the contents of which have been duly noted.

 

Subsequent to the above, in all good faith I believe the "agreement" sent to be a reconstituted copy, rather than the original as I requested in my letter of xx/xx/xx.

 

I now require you to disclose, in full, the documents from which you reconstituted this "agreement".

 

Please confirm in writing within x days of the date of this letter that you do indeed hold an original copy of the alleged Consumer Credit Agreement.

If you do intend to send a reconstituted copy of the CCA you must declare the reason why it has been reconstituted, if the original exists and in what form (microfiche) etc.

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take any action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a true credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies:

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

 

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

 

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

 

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

 

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

I reserve the right to report any actions to the contrary to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

 

If you are unable to furnish me with the requested documents, you should inform me of such in writing, acknowledge that this matter is now closed and that you will not contact me again.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter and await your written response.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And There Is Me Thinking Pinky & Perky

 

Cheeky bugger ;-)

 

Yes, keep us posted BF and the best of luck to you!

 

(make sure you keep copies of all correspondence, both sent and recieved)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice one Dotty and thanks. Could you please clarify which is true though:

 

(From your letter)

"The copy of the executed agreement need not be an exact copy but it must be a ‘true copy’ and not some reconstruction of what the original might have been and it must contain the same terms as the original."

 

or

 

(from Harassed Senior's advice)

It is permissable for them to send a reconstituted Agreement to answer the CCA request.

 

Or are they saying the same thing? Or is the crucial point, "might have been"? I'm a bit confused now...

 

My apologies.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...