Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The latest polls say otherwise    Party support: 3 June 2024   LAB 45% (40-50%) CON 24% (19-29%) REF 11% (8-14%) LD 10% (7-13%) GRN 5% (2-8%) SNP 3% (2-4%) PC 1% (<1-2%)
    • Oh, one other thing. It may sound a silly question, but as they say - silly questions are better than silly mistakes. The correspondence address in the current case and the previous one is correct and current. I've never actually written to the banks to confirm my address, as is regularly advised, because I presumed if Moriarty/IDR/J&P are using that address, there would be no need to. So because both cases seem to have my address correct, should I still write to the bank or take it that there's no need in this instance?
    • Yep, that's it @dx100uk - thanks for the clarification. My bad... Cheers again for all your help 👍
    • Hi all Just coming back to this Forum, as it helped me so much a few years back with ADCB/Moriarty. So I've had the circulars from IDR chasing Emirates NBD debt. They've been on and off over past few years, seem to be a run of letters, emails SMS and then go quiet, then start again.   A few months ago, same started with J&P, just a basic letter, email, sms asking to get in contact. Then last week I saw an email from Emirates NBD saying J&P were acting on their behalf. Up to this point, the main thrust of the letter seems to be please contact us, or contact ENBD about payment. Then I received a letter - I can't scan/upload it at this time but I will as soon as I can - which appears to be similar to what I've seen on other threads. Namely giving bank details of ENBD, saying they've been "instructed to pursue action", and saying they've enclosed a copy of Information Sheet, Reply Form in compliance of Pre-Action Protocol They state I have 30 days from date on letter to reply, and "if you fail to do so our client may have no option but to pursue further action against you". I'm of the view, as per advice on other threads and my experience with the other lender/company, to reply as per thread #5 in the main thread. On the basis that I wouldn't wish to give them ammunition by not replying or missing the opportunity. I'm aware that on some threads, in similar situation, one poster had been advised by sols not to reply and apparently J&P didn't progress from there, other than sending same requests. I feel these things are always down to the individual's choice, and I'm keen to see what others may have done/may be doing so will actively read other threads also.   Please feel free to ask if I can help with anything, or share any opinions, and in the meantime I'll get the uploads done ASAP.   Thanks again for everyone's help in the past, and hopefully the future, and good luck to all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Urgent Help house repossession I Rent off landlord


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5508 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm renting a house and have been for two and a half years, i have always paid rent into landlords bank account and never really heard from him we paid £975 depiost when we moved in. he has not got a buy to let morgage. We have since found out he has not being paying the morgage since christmas and in court for repossession in a couple of weeks, although i have all the papers because since found out can not contact him at all, phone disconnected and address on tenancy agreement i believe owned by his parents and everytime i go there they ysay he does not live there and don't know any contact details. Can the court go ahead with repossession without him being there? Also today had a letter from the land register bunkruptcy department for him for separate case???

Do i have any rights at all? just been made reductant got no depoist for another place as landlord got it?? do i need to start packing my boxes and advice or help would be gratefully accepted on this very stressful suitation please...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi James, can I suggest you contact Shelter Shelter England - The housing and homelessness charity

 

They will be able to advise you regarding your tenancy and the landlord's repossession situation.

 

In some cases the building societies will allow the tenant to remain in the property until it is sold with the rent being paid to them - I don't have personal experience of this, but I have read of these cases. If you contact Shelter they will be able to tell you what to do.

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have since spoke to landlord and is not going to appear in court i have the paperwork for court case, morgage was interest only, I signed tenancy Nov 06 for six months with roll on month by month. Rent is £650 a month. He has not paid since Oct 08. He says he has gone bankrupt and house is part of that. The court case is monday 11th May. Will they just give a repossision order because he has not turned up. If so how long will they give us to leave??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jamestoday78,in reply to your last post:

 

1.You still have not confirmed whether the landlord has a Buy to Let mortgage or not.This is an important matter as there are two types of morgages.

 

2.In one particular type of mortgage, the tenant would be allowed to remain until the lender decided to sell.The second type would involve you speaking to the bailiffs and they should give you a bit of breathing space to find an alternative place to live.

 

3.In order for the house to be repossessed,there would have to be a high level arrears and no repayment plan on offer by the mortgage payer.

 

I would suggest that you contact the court and find out what is actually happening.In the meantime,look for an alternative place to live.

 

One other question -

 

What has happened about your deposit?

Edited by Nightmare4banks
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, it is not a buy to let, Deposit was £975 but was before the new guidelines( Nov 06). Have now been advised that at the hearing a 28 day order will be given propably, if keys not handed back then they will apply for a eviction order. with a further 14 days to leave, I believe this is served on lardlord but as his mail comes here, we should get this time. Hopefully...

As said landlord has no interest in fighting the case and is not going to appear

Link to post
Share on other sites

jamestoday78,

 

In reply to your last post:

 

1.You should receive any notices as they are served on the address for the attention of the occupier.

 

2.Try and come to some possible arrangement for the landlord to refund your deposit so that you can move out more easily.

 

3.If the property does not have a Buy to Let mortgage,just speak to the bailiffs to come to some arrangement as soon as you are aware of the eviction.

 

Anyway,I hope this helps.

 

I f you any more questions,just ask.

 

Keep us posted.

 

All the best!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...