Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

how do i remove a legal charge of my property


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4027 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I agree. If it is a charge then as long as you have proof it is paid, they should take it off. If it is a CCJ, then you can hae it marked at satisfied, but it stays on for a total of 6 years. You may have to make a payment to the court for this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask Anglian Water to remove the charge with immediate effect. Send them a letter asking them to do this, obviously with a copy of your receipt. They should also send you a copy of the Official Copies once this has been done. It only takes the Land Registry a couple of days to remove it.

 

Keep on at them if you don't get any satisfaction.

 

HH

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

due to unemployment from 2011 to 2012

 

i failed to pay my water bill in march 2013

 

got a ccj from the courts for £1287.27p

 

wrote to them in march 2013 replied saying they cannot accept payment plan for this debt and i must aproach the courts.

 

did so was told by the courts it was anglian water who should agree a repayment plan with you.

 

month ago got a letter saying i had days to sort this out or would apply to the courts for a attachment of earnings order

costing me a £100.00 in extra costs.

 

wrote back within time limit with full list of my circumstances and earnings offering them £10 per week

to review it in 3 months to see if situation improved when more could be payable to them.

to date no reply .

 

today 6th of june 2013 had another letter dated the 29th may 2013

as i continued to ignore there letters they was applying for a charging order

then they will apply to the courts for the forced sale of the property to clear the debt

unless i reply by 4pm on 12 june 2013.

 

my wife was in tears opening this and panacking what to do .

 

no letters been ignored

have proof of postage on all letters sent.

 

why are they behaving like this when im trying to sort it out and get a payment plan in force.

 

can any person advise me what to do next because i seem to be banging my head on a brick wall .

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should apply to the court on an N245 form asking for the judgement amount to be varied to instalments you can afford. I have affixed an N245 form to this post. When you have completed it - take it to your local court (take a photocopy for yourself first) there is a fee of £40 to pay unless you are umemployed or receiving certain benefits (I have also affixed the info on what the criteria is for fee remission).

 

Anglian Water are a nightmare to deal with - get the form into court and let a judge order what payments you can afford - Anglian Water will have to abide by the court's decision.

N245.pdf

ex160a_web_1010.pdf

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...