Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MBNA AGREEMENT. Just received. Is it unenforceable?


anxious1234
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5529 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Although it is an application form it looks enforceable to me as it contains the precribed terms on the rear of the document and this is refered to at the bottom of the front page, so not a chop shop job

But I'm not an expert, maybe wait for a second opinion

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you have a look at the agreement to see if unenforceable.

I owe £18,000 and have received a letter from MBNA offering full and final settlement at £6500 ( they proposed £7500 2 weeks ago). This leads me to believe that it may be unenforceable. If enforceable then why offer this settlement figure.

 

Need to make a decision on what to do.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi anxious, I think it is clear that the agreement is a true copy..........however can I ask what your initial credit limit was ? The reason I ask is that you agreement ( in line with other mbna's ) only shows interest charges for limits of £4000, £7000 and £10000. It has been mentioned elsewhere that if your limit was different to these amounts then there is no interest rate shown, therefore making it unenforcable.

 

Cosalt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and I think you could be right, if it was enforcable then why offer a discount ?

 

Just bear in mind that if they offer you a 'discount' this is likely to be marked as a partial settlement, meaning they or a dca can still come after you for the balance. If you do intend to go down this road, then insist on confirmation it is 'full and final' in writing before proceeding.

 

Cosalt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. As far as I know its always been £18,000. However, only have copies going back to 2007. If not £18,000 then I am sure it would have been £15,000

 

Read your agreement VERY VERY carefully, especially the sections 1d to 1h.

 

I bring your attention to wording of 1h especially.

 

"The APRs Shown below apply after the end of any promotional period set out in paragraph 1e ..."

 

The table (as stated by already in this thread) only gives APRs for Agreements with limits of 4k, 7k and 10k.

 

A credit card is an instrument of "Revolving Credit" - and if you didnt have a limit of 4k. 7k or 10k, then MBNA have failed to state the prescribed term of the interest rate.

 

There may be other flaws with the agreement ... but this is the only one I have become good at spotting.

 

in my opinion - this one failure alone makes your agreement unenforceable.

 

but please check the wording very carefully and ensure I havent missed anything.

 

toto

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Have re uploaded the terms which should be clearer.

 

Can someone check these for me. I understand that the interst rate is not showing as my credit limit was £18,000 but how about the rest of the terms. Any other dodgy ones.

 

Will the fact the the interest does not show for my given credit limit stand up on its own in court as being unenforceable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Have re uploaded the terms which should be clearer.

 

Can someone check these for me. I understand that the interst rate is not showing as my credit limit was £18,000 but how about the rest of the terms. Any other dodgy ones.

 

Will the fact the the interest does not show for my given credit limit stand up on its own in court as being unenforceable?

 

 

Failure to state the rate of interest is a prescribed term and that alone makes the agreement unenforceable. there are other things wrong with it in terms of interspersing etc.

 

MBNA would of course try to deny that the agreement is defective.

 

however, you will need to satisfy yourself that the agreement is unenforceable. I dont know if I can explain it better than I already have.

 

are you asking this with a view seeking a declaration that the agreement is unenforceable ?

 

have you read the guide by Steve4064 ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to attach

 

Well there you can see at the end of point 1e

 

"We will then charge interest on transactions as shown in paragraph 1h"
They have stated the rate of interest for any promotional period only. Not for revolving credit. Edited by toto003
Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL. I meant to say unenforceable. Thanks for your input.

 

If I understand it correctly then the fact that my limit was £18,000 and the rates shown are upto £10,000 only, means in my case they have not given a rate, making it unenforceable. Correct?

 

You also mention other things wrong. Can you enlighten me?

 

Given that they have offered me a 65% discount, would you accept this or fight it as unenforceable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I understand it correctly then the fact that my limit was £18,000 and the rates shown are up to £10,000 only, means in my case they have not given a rate, making it unenforceable. Correct?

 

It is actually worse (for them) They have only stated rates for three exact limits. So if the initial credit limit was £9,999 or £7,001 for example, then they would also not have the interest rate stated.

 

You also mention other things wrong. Can you enlighten me?

 

Please remember I am am amateur at this (as are most of the people on this site) - and this is a self-help site, I haven't quite got the gist of everything yet - and until I understand the other factors 100% - I will not try to go into detail explaining them, I can only try and point you in the right direction.

 

Here is a list of areas where your agreement MAY have issues -

(let me be clear - I CANNOT EXPAND ANY FURTHER ON THIS AS I DONT FULLY UNDERSTAND IT MYSELF YET)

 

 

Repayments - The timing of repayments must be expressed in the manner required by Schedule 1, Paragraph 12 and the amounts of repayments must be expressed in the manner Required by Schedule 1 Paragraph 13 if the agreement is to be properly executed. Regulation 6(1) of the Agreement Regulations requires the signed document embodying the regulated consumer credit agreement to contain a term stating how the debtor is to discharge his obligations under the agreement to make the repayments - Paragraph 5 of Schedule 6 (note - Prescribed for the purposes of Section 61(1) (a) and Section 127 (3) of the Act

 

Other areas that need to be looked at with mbna agreements are (but do not necessarily make an agreement unenforceable);

Forms of statement of protection and remedies

Variable Rates or items

Charges on default

APRs (must be calculated in a certain manner)

Interspersing (putting in waffle I guess?)

Prominence (Certain things have to have different lettering - I think larger or underlined than others)

 

Given that they have offered me a 65% discount, would you accept this or fight it as unenforceable?

 

I would read the offer they have made to you VERY carefully and ensure there isn't the word "Partial" - their offer must state Full & Final - and you must have it in writing.

 

having read what mbna have done to some poor people on this forum, I wouldnt want them to get a penny ... you may have a different view.

 

there is obviously the hassle factor of getting the debt declared unenforceable and if you wish to tackle this issue yourself , you will need to spend the time to learn how these lenders are likely to behave, only you can decide if it is worth the effort.

 

hope this helps

 

toto

Edited by toto003
Minor Grammar and Spelling corrections.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...