Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Complaining to the OFT


42man
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5101 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Think its the best way to go,I e.mailled the Financial Ombudsmans Service, got an e.mail back today from the FOS office with a complaint form to fill in and send it back to them,phoned AIC the other day and really enjoyed my spar with them,I must admit before i came to CAG I dreaded them phoning,only good thing is now if I want a bit of fun I phone them,BUT they have tried to phone me 4 times in last 2 days but my Truecall is set to Zap them which it has done on all 4 occasions, wish I could see their little faces when a machine basically tells them to P*** OFF I have now sent a SAR to OD to get the paperwork I want

 

Torexxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

i've sent a few of the standard letters out in the past and they often seem to be ignored. take the latest one, letter from LCS about a debt that's not mine. i send out the std letter that says it's not mine, stop harassing me or i'll complain to TS/OFT. i even added a couple of lines to help them get the right person. what happened? letter totally ignored and they threaten me with solicitors.

i wonder if these DCA's can read. or are they simply too damned arrogant to care? or do they know that the OFT won't do anything as no-one has a clue about the actual size of the problem so parliament won't force them?

mp's being told that these are isolated incidents. don't you think it would be a good idea to have and independent body who could, a least, count the real number of complaints?

i'm not saying that the CAG isn't help from the gods, just that someone we can trust should be keeping the score.

 

i also honestly believe that when DCA's open letters they look for money, cheques, payment slips, etc. any letter without a payment, they just bin.

 

question: is there a standard complaint letter for Trading Standards please?

Regards from sunny Notlob, Lancs UK

 

Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain.

Lily Tomlin

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send this recorded to LCS

 

OFFICIAL COMPLAINT and LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

Dear Sirs

 

You have recently written to me stating that I allegedly owed you a significant amount of money. This has made me very, very scared indeed.

 

Despite having written to you on several occasions about this alleged debt. I can categorically state that I have NEVER had an account with (xxxxx). I am now of the opinion that you are harrassing me and completely ignoring my letters and responding by sending generically produced correspondence.

 

I now require your official complaints procedure within the next 14 days, if this is not forthcoming I will have no option but to report your behaviour to Trading Standards and the Office Of Fair Trading, as well as writing to Gareth Thomas who is Undersecretary Of State for Trade And Consumer Affairs. I would also remind you of the recent case of Ferguson vs British Gas

 

 

I will highlight points 20, 21 and 22

  1. What British Gas was threatening was undoubtedly serious. Mr Porter sought to downgrade it by saying that Ms Ferguson knew the claims and threats were unjustified. That is absurd: a victim of harassment will almost always know that it is unjustified. The Act is there to protect people against unjustified harassment. Indeed if the impugned conduct is justified it is unlikely to amount to harassment at all.
     
  2. Mr Porter also made the point that the correspondence was computer generated and so, for some reason which I do not really follow, Ms Ferguson should not have taken it as seriously as if it had come from an individual. But real people are responsible for programming and entering material into the computer. It is British Gas's system which, at the very least, allowed the impugned conduct to happen.
  3. Moreover the threats and demands were to be read by a real person, not by a computer. A real person is likely to suffer real anxiety and distress if threatened in the way which Ms Ferguson was. And a real person is unlikely to take comfort from knowing that the claims and threats are unjustified or that they were sent by a computer system: that will not necessarily allay the fear that the threats will not be carried out. How is a consumer such as Ms Ferguson to know whether or not, for instance, a threat such as "we will tell a credit reference agency in the next 10 days that you have not paid" (letter of 2nd January) will not be carried out by the same computer system which sent the unjustified letter and all its predecessor bills and threats? After all no amount of writing and telephoning had stopped the system so far – at times it must have seemed like a monster machine out of control moving relentlessly forward – a million miles from the "world class level of service" (letter of 9th January) which British Gas says it aims to offer.

Therefore please take this as a LETTER BEFORE ACTION. As if this behaviour continues I will have NO hesitation in taking this before the court.

 

I would like you to please answer/address the following points/requests.

 

I would kindly ask what information you hold on me that made you contact me in the first place, and where you acquired my information from.

 

What steps are in place to ensure this does not happen to me again.

 

Confirmation in writing that I do not owe you or any client you represent this amount of money.

 

A written apology for this mistake which led me to a state of panic.

 

I trust this makes my position perfectly clear and I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter and expect a response along with your official complaints procedure within 14 days.

 

Yours faithfully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send this recorded to LCS

 

OFFICIAL COMPLAINT and LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

...etc

 

sent this day ... watch out for the next exciting installment

(sorry, flashback to the days of the tanner rush)

Regards from sunny Notlob, Lancs UK

 

Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain.

Lily Tomlin

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am having trouble with barclaycard, they have failed to comply with my legal request for a true copy of a signed credit agreement and passed the debt to a debt collector. i responded in writjng stating i do not wish to engage with them and that i ill not make an appointment for them to vist ststing all the legal stuff etc and explained the original problem, however they have since posted a card to state the day they will be attending my property. i feel i need to report them to the OFT but cant seem to get any help there, does anyone have any advice ? thanks x

Link to post
Share on other sites

does the stuff you've sent include the standard letter that says they will be trespassing if they visit you? it withdraws the common law assumption that visitors can even hand deliver letters to you?

Regards from sunny Notlob, Lancs UK

 

Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain.

Lily Tomlin

Link to post
Share on other sites

FYI: "they have received it" ...

when the royal mail delivers recorded delivery items to a company they often only get a signature for a quantity, i.e. not for each individual letter! i sent at least 8 letters to TSB and 5 or 6 to Barclaycard yet when i checked the tracking numbers they simply said delivered but did not show any signatures. when i wrote to royal mail about the missing signatures they explained about not getting individual signatures for items, basically, "when there's more than one".

somewhere on this site it has been said a number of times that there is an assumption under british law that if you obtain a certificate of posting then the item will have been delivered after allowing a reasonable period. this saves a fortune on postage too!

Regards from sunny Notlob, Lancs UK

 

Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain.

Lily Tomlin

Link to post
Share on other sites

or ignore them? they ain't gonna kick in the door. Answer the door and speak only in pig latin?

 

Answer the door and insist that the dc is your long lost friend, Doug, who you thought had been killed in a freak accident with a cucumber and football. No matter what he says just keep repeating 'God! Doug! it IS you! But I was at your funeral! Your mum! have you seen your mum? Where have you been?'

Link to post
Share on other sites

... still unsure what to do when the debt collector calls ...

i would think that getting evidence that they have ignored your letters would be a good idea, i.e. answer the door but keep the chain on, better still, if you have an access system, hold the entire conversation via that and get them to say who they are, who they represent and why they are visiting your address - while you record the entire conversation for the OFT, Trading Standards, your MP, ... others feel free to add to the list

Regards from sunny Notlob, Lancs UK

 

Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain.

Lily Tomlin

Link to post
Share on other sites

it seems they recieved the letter as i recieved a response frm thm asking me to call lthem the debt has now gone from £40 o £4900.00 thats complete madness. they also state the armstrong v sheppard (1959) case i quoted can only come from a court and not an individual ? Anyhow i have also sent barclaycard a subject access request an i am waiting for that.

kraken 1 - that is certainly something i will take great pleasure in doing, thats funny x

Link to post
Share on other sites

the letter to lcs would seem to have done the trick, many thanks.

there's even a little icing on the cake too, they replied to me via email, naturally to my cag address, which i retrieved via googlemail. what's so good about that you ask? only that the filters which googlemail use have declared that the email from lcs was spam! i thought about telling them but this is far more fun.

thanks again for the help.

Regards from sunny Notlob, Lancs UK

 

Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain.

Lily Tomlin

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi

I have been harassed by a company in Torquay called Veritas,to be honest I am terrified of him now,He gave me a date to respond,I responded and said I was going away so 2 hrs after he received my response he served me with a Stat Demand,no negotiations,I have now had to pay this and have worked out I overpaid by £250,this is why I responded and said I want to pay but bill is wrong.I told him I was going to complain to OFT etc he has said if I do he will sue me for deformation.I am at present staying with My Mum as I am now too frightened to go home,he just keeps threatening and intimidating,with all my debts I have come to arrangements (dmp)and gradually I am getting sorted but it seems this DC is going around all the creditors and trying to get them to join his gang,I am told this is against the DPA but what can I do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Foxy....can you tell us a little more about this ? If there is a dispute then you could have had the stat demand set aside...And if you have overpaid them then you should make a formal request for the amount (had you disputed this before the stat demand arrived ?)...by all means you should report this to the OFT and their local trading standards....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 42man

I will if I may send you a precise of the episode,but to cut a long story short,he was a debt collector for a previous debt and I proved him wrong,he actually called me a Lady of the Gutter,which did rile me and I was furious,when he was given this debt it was like a red rag to a bull.I was just about to leave to visit my Husband who is working abroad and I didnt have much time to do anything 12 hrs he served it at 8 pm at night and I had until 12 the next day and I wouldn't have been back in time,so I had to pay,but if you saw some of the correspondence he wrote and he called me a Liar etc etc it was absolutely despicable,I feel threatened and terrorised but he has also said if I complain he will sue me for deformation,!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...