Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Agency worker, No holiday pay!?!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5548 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Looking for help on writing a letter to my other halfs work and other snippets of help I can get from you guys in the know.

 

The situation is my girlfriend has worked for this company(she says they are and agency, they do care work, but I don't know how you would class them as an agency?) for over 6 years. Currently and averagely she does around 50 hours per week usually getting around £1500 before deductions every month.

 

Now the people that work for this company have been told(not exclusively from what I know but she tells me no-one gets it) they are not entitled to holiday pay but until recently(around a year ago) they would take money from her wages and keep it(as holiday pay to give her) and give it to her when she later asked for her holiday money. Now I am pretty sure that this is 'rolled-up holiday pay' which was pretty much outlawed by a European Court of Justice ruling around 2006?

 

Now if they have still been doing this up until only a year ago that seems pretty serious? The fact she doesn't receive holiday pay also for all the time that she has worked there apart from the excuse Agencies used with 'rolled-up holiday pay'.

 

I want to write a letter to her employers outlining the seriousness of this all but have no idea how to put it and what would the consequences be to them? Should it be reported? To who? What to do about it? etc...

 

Now the letter could you guys give me some sort of ideas what to write and how to write it.(She is pretty scared and doesn't want them to know it is anything to do with her so was going to do it anonymously).

 

Your help and advice is very much appreciated.

 

Cheers

Stuart WIlson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hope this helps

 

The agency i work for does this :

 

We acru our holiday hours at a percentage per working day and normally something like an hours wage + 50P deducted from wages.

 

So if i worked for 5 weeks straight - i would acru around 4 days holiday.

 

4 x 7.5hrs @ £6.50ph = 30 x £195 holday pay.

 

Since 46p an hour gets deducted for our holiday entitlement it adds up to about an exrta £60.

 

Sorry if this doesnt make sense but its how our agency works it.

 

Best thing is to ask ACAS or the HR department as everywhere is diffrent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it is unlawful. She is still covered by the working time regulations and therefore entitled to 4.8 weeks paid annual leave, however if her hours and/or pay vary then her pay over the most recent 12 week period are divided by the hours she worked over that 12 week period to ascertain an average hourly rate which is then used to ascertain what her holiday pay should be.

 

The 12 weeks should not be twelve consecutive weeks if she has not worked for twelve consecutive weeks, it should be based on the last twelve weeks in which she had work.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be a good idea to see if your girlfriend still has a copy of her contract.

 

It's been said here already, a lot of agencies have different policies, but fishing out that contract could possibly give her that extra bit of ammo

Edited by ajax95
extra info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, By failing to provide either a Contract of employment or a written statement within 2 months the Agency could find itself having Terms and conditions imposed upon itself by an Employment Tribunal in line with current employment law. By doing that, any compensation awarded should this go to Tribunal can be upped by an extra 2 to 4 weeks wages.

 

Failure to pay Holiday pay for the last 5 or 6 years will also not go down well. In fact by failing to pay Holiday pay the Agency has made a deduction from wages that's unlawful. Which an Employment Tribunal will not like.

Edited by Faustus
mong spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...