Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

What are my options??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5550 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI, brief out line,

I was sacked last year for having to much sick time, I was just about over the threshold for the invocation of the Dp action, I'd been there for 11.5 months.

My question is, I have noticed on my contract several parts regarding what sort of action can be taken for different sorts of offence, the most interesting point is that unless it's gross misconduct then the procedure can only jump 2 steps,i.e. Verbal warning, 1st writen, 2nd written, sack. In my case they went from no warnings to sack! there are also more contitions they have ignored, which would have ment that DP should prob not have been invoked.

 

I was in the union, they represented me but were worse than useless, they let an "informal chat" turn into a formal DP hearing, even after I said that I was in no fit state to be there. They let 2 managers bombard me with the same 2 questions for 30 mins. These questions where, if they kept me on how would I ensure better attendence, I had no answer to this apart from I'm already doing everything in my power to try not to get ill, and the other question was, could I not come back to work now and do something easier? I said that I couldn't as I'd been signed off by the doctor, and because of my ilnesses I would be a danger to myself and others, I was suffering from Vertigo, insomnia and was being test for Cancer(luckily all clear).

The result of this "meeting" was I was sacked. I appealed, I had a union rep with me at the appeal, I felt better so was better prepeared, almost as soon as I walked into the appeal I knew that I'd lost, the union rep was useless again, but I was on the ball so I pulled them to bits with regard to procedure, they just said that the procedure was a guideline only and they didn't have to follow it, I asked for a break to speak to the rep, asked him why he was allowing this farce to carry on, he said that I was doing good and was bound to win as I had them on the procedure and just carry on as before. I told him I wasn't happy, that he should be insisting they follow procedure which had been negoiated by the union and was in my contract, he wouldn't "rock the boat".

So can I sue? if I can,,,,

Do I sue then company, the union or both?

I've been out of work since then apart from 2 weeks as a christmas temp, so could I claim loss of earnings from date of sack until I started work as a temp? or up to now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

With less than 12 month service you have a lot less rights than someone with 12 months +. I don't think you're entitled to claim unfair dismissal unless on the grounds of discrimination.

 

Even if you had a claim I suspect you'd be out of time as you have to file with the ET within 3 months, they will extend but only in very exceptional circumstances.

 

Hopefully someone with HR know how will be along soon.

Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi poopynurse and thanx,

I already know I can't go for unfair or wrongful dismissall, I'm talking about a CC claim, I know that I wasn't sacked because of time off, I was sacked because I kicked up a fuss about a H&S issue, they were just using the time off as an excuse, if they counted the overtime I'd done then I would have been below the 4% threshhold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have my contract, and employee hand book with my terms of contract in it, they have quoted the t&c's so they can sack me, then said they are guidelines when they don't suit their purpose. I want to SAR them, but need to know if I can take it to CC before I do, otherwise it's a waste of £10.00.

thanx Jimi

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have heard of a case where someone took their union to CC and got reimbursed for all the union fees they paid. I think the issue about consequential loss is too remote, it was judged that they had not received the 'service' they had paid for through their fees and therefore were entitled to a refund.

 

I googled 'union' and 'bad advice' and combinations of similar words and eventually found a reference to the case. I cannot remember all the details of the case, if I do, i'll post it here.

 

Perhaps CAB may be able to help you.

I am not a lawyer, so all my advice is provided on the basis that you will check them with a trained legal professional with legal insurance.:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...