Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. Please will you repost your images in one single multipage PDF file – the right way round et cetera.  
    • And just to reiterate – I'm sorry if the message above sounds a bit harsh. We have to get the message out to other people who visit this thread as well. I realise that you are having a difficult time and we will do our best to help you, of course
    • The last photo shows the overflow carpark looking at the block which our room was located. When we got out of the car my partner thought that the building was for staff accommodation.  The unsecured bedroom window opened onto this car park.
    • Also I see that you are doing a lot of this on the telephone – and without any written confirmation. This is a big mistake. You need to start taking this matter seriously and so everything should go in writing. If you have telephone calls then they should normally be recorded. Read our customer services guide. You should make notes about every telephone call and then you should send an email to your telephone correspondence confirming what they have said or what they have agreed. It is important that you keep detailed paper trails here. Of course we may be jumping the gun and maybe big motoring world will step up to the mark – but I'm afraid that they have a lousy reputation has you have seen and so you need to start practising survival techniques and protecting yourself. You say for instance in your letter of rejection that the mechanic told you on the telephone that the gearbox needed replacing. Do you have any other evidence of this conversation? This is going to sound a bit harsh – but other people will be visiting this thread as well for their own purposes. You conducted their research about this company before you bought the vehicle. You now are fully aware that this is a company which can be very difficult to deal with and causes a lot of problems for many of their customers and yet you are still taking a telephone/verbal approach. Do I need to say any more? Also one of the documents you put up is an email exchange but it is not clear who is writing to who or what dates. If you showed this email to somebody in a pub they would be asking lots of questions about who sent the first message, who sent the second message, what dates were they sent et cetera. Please think about this before you post things. Please can you clarify the details of that email exchange. Please will you present the information carefully. We are all volunteers here and we have to rely on you to do the spadework
    • I told the DM that the room was not acceptable because of the reasons already mentioned. He informed me that they were full that night and that they could move me to the room next door (would not solve my problem with the rooms location). Told the DM that I could not stay in the room provided for the night so left no option but to leave. DM did not reply and I walked out.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

M&S 1991 chargecard - is this application enforceable?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5067 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Robin,

 

your letter is fine and contains everything relevant

 

have you read this:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use.html

 

there is a couple of posts in scotland forum where mands have issued court proceedings on the same as yours and there are defending on full and waiting on hearing dates

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks Auntie Ida ...

 

M&S have stated in their responses that the application form and agreement form act as one and the same.

 

Letter to them for c card will go off on Monday, I also have a preference account with them, where they have sent exactly the same thing, with their template responses exactly the same. They have sent just an application form, and past (blurred) t&cs, and present t&cs.

 

So will also send off a letter on Monday saying the same for this acct too.

 

If they reply to my next letter(s), with the same drivel of "we have examined the agreement and account and believe it enforceable, evidenced not least by your use of the account, and collection activties will continue" ending in the usual, this is our final response, go to FOS if you remain unhappy.

 

Shall I send if off to FOS , or shall I just leave things hanging, and see what happens next i.e DCA comes on the scene..... or they issue court proceedings.... etc

 

Any thoughts on best way to be played?

 

Robin xx;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's really up to you on what you what route you wish to tkae and would feel comfortable with

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Im in a similar situation it seems.

Ive just received back my 2nd copy of an application form, NOT and agreement, which i took out as a chargecard in jan 1994.

I'm fairly naive when it comes to things like this, and I've spent weeks reading through threads on m&s stuff, so forgive my ignorance but, could I not just send my paperwork to FOS and send m&S a letter telling them i've done this as they obviously have no signed agreement, since sent same paperwork twice now, and to save this merry-go-round?

Also, I am still paying the minimum monthly payment by DD, should I stop the payment or continue?

Any help would be much appreciated

Many thanks

Emmtay

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome fellow M&S victim ....!

 

FOS will only look at your complaint, once a final decision has been issued by, in this case, M&S.

 

The fact that they have sent you an application form, without any , or all, of the prescribed terms contained within it, does not meet the terms of the CCA74 and effectively makes the agreement unenforceable.

 

I would just write back and tell them this - once they send you a response with "this is our full and final decision" then you can go to the Ombudsman Service - if you wish.

 

If you stop payments, which you are legally able do to as the acct is in dispute, then they will be relentless in phoning you - will throw a default on you after 3 mths of missed payments, and ignore everything you say about OFT collection guidlines, saying that they don't have to adhere to them.

 

I have reported them to the OFT about this.

 

Good luck ..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Robinredbreast

I think i'm going to continue to pay monthly dd for now, but will send a letter saying they obviously dont have an agreement so the debt is unenforcable?

Have you sent a similar letter already? Can't remember who's done what, i've read that many posts!

I would be far more confident if i knew someone had actually won against m&s on this, does anyone know anyone who has?

thanks

emmtay

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in the same boat with them too. They have sent me three illegible microfiche copies, plus some other persons CCA who lives in Wigan, a letter asking me to provide a signature for my new married name, a letter asking me to sign a declaration that I have not or will not use the details of the other persons CCA...........unbelievable....all ignored by the way

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in the same boat with them too. They have sent me three illegible microfiche copies, plus some other persons CCA who lives in Wigan, a letter asking me to provide a signature for my new married name, a letter asking me to sign a declaration that I have not or will not use the details of the other persons CCA...........unbelievable....all ignored by the way

 

Have you reported them to the Information Commissioners Office?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I have recd a default notice for my pref acct now .. and a demand for full payment within 48 hrs, but the day I revd the letter is 48 hrs later then the date they sent it .... ???

 

Numerous calls every day, msgs left on ansaphone ... so have reported them again to OFT.

 

Still in dispute .... asked them to please, please tell me where the prescribed terms are within the agreement, not the t&cs or anywhere else ..... but in the agreement !!!!!!!

 

They fudge, wriggle and try to obscure the facts, but they fail ... I think my next reply will be .. this is MY final response ... and I would welcome a defence of your claims in court .... "do'ya feel lucky, well do'ya punk... go on make my day" ..... !!!! (48 magnum packed with CCA and case law and ready for action my friends... !!!! :lol:)

 

Keep the faith good people, all report them to OFT, get their credit licence removed and hey presto .... no more problem ...

 

Deep breath now...... and release ..... deep breath .... and release....:rolleyes::grin:

 

Robin xxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is a couple of caggers in the scotland forum at court stage

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dealing-debt-scotland/195822-m-more-court-papers-2.html

 

iv'e asked beetle for nay update if it helps

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, with ref to the postings I made earlier in this thread......M&S must know that the application form they sent me is unenforcable and I will tell you why........are you sitting comfortably??

 

I have been paying Rockwell for YEARS £5 per month for the M&S card I took out in 1994 (yes thats right!!!!!!):eek:

 

Anyway I decided to ask for a copy of the CCA in 2007 and when I got the app form back I stopped payments cos I know its unenforcable......

they only send a photocopy of the app form ..no statements to show how they worked out I owed thrm X amount of money etc.

 

SOOO...many threats of court action etc from M&S, and a recorded delivery of the said app form by them!!! they were going to issue court claim.. so I said "go ahead, I'll see you there":D

 

Funny how they did nothing and passed it onto yet ANOTHER bunch of muppetts. This time its "COLLECT DIRECT UK" yikes I'm scared!!! (NOT!!!....M&S)

 

They issued usual dribble about how I would have to go to court and the bailiff would be knocking at my door and then they moved on to the "we are about to investigate you" threat!!

 

Yipee I replied....good go ahead, see you in court guys, after reporting you for your lovely letters....all of which were designed to scare the pants off me (OOhhhhhhh)!!!:rolleyes:

 

Soo....I emailed them (different tactic) and told em to get a grip and stop sending daft letters cos my solicitor could only cope with one laugh a day in this current climate!!

 

Soo....they said, hows about you just pay us the £5 you were originally paying to rockwell all those moons ago, and we'll say no more about it.

 

Sooo...I said yeah ok then, cos you know I'm ready to dispute any claim you come up with dont you, and they said..."yes Madam we do!!!!!!":D

 

 

 

Hope you enjoyed todays jackanory peeps.....;)

 

fedup xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello ODC!

 

I just wonder why are you even paying them a fiver.

 

Spooky...you read my thoughts!

 

I'd stop paying them, because all it will do is keep re-setting the Statute Barred Clock every time a payment is made, causing this issue to drag on more or less for ever.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm paying because I owe the money......regardsless of their tactics etc :D

 

You may owe the money but its not to a DCA. If M&S sold this debt on to a DCA then they will have sold it for a pittance, claimed its full value in Tax Relief from the Government and wrote it off. If M&S still own the debt and you feel you owe the money then why not pay M&S directly and cut the DCA out of the loop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Have recd a reponse from M&S to my last letter, in which I have advised them, that as they have admitted the prescribed terms for the chargecard are in the separte t&cs, to which the appliction form (their alleged agreement) makes no referral to - then the agreement is unenforceable.

 

I haven't even mentioned that the agreement provided is for a store card, when I now have a credit card that was unsolicited and sent out by them.

 

Anyway, they have just sent the same template letter to me, "we have examined the agreement, we believe enforceable .. blah blah .. not least evidenced by your use of the account ... go to FOS if unhappy .. blah blah ..."

 

So, could I have advice on how you phrase your letter saying, basically, we are at stalemate ... I believe unenforceable .. you believe enforceable .. etc ... and in essence saying to them, either drop it or issue court proceedings ....

 

Or just go to FOS to delay things, then when FOS no doubt come back with "we are not in a position to determine validity of contracts", then use that to say to M&S, well they can't decide, so you best let a judge do it ...

 

What do you think ???? Are there any templates on here when you basically saying to them, my position is clear, and this is my full and final response ...?

 

Anyhelp or anyones experiences greatly appreciated ...

 

Thanks chicks ...

Robin :)

Edited by robinredbreast
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...