Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

LMD75 versus Egg


lmd75
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5230 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

I have received two letters from Egg stating that they no longer have my letter of complaint and I need to resend it. If they do not hear back from me in 4 weeks then they will close the complaint.

 

Then a week later I received another letter stating that it has been 4 weeks since my complaint and that their enquiries are 'continuing' and will be in contact soon.

 

Is this standard practice /delaying tactics to say that they have lost the complaint and then follow up with another letter saying that they are dealing with it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

I have not bothered to respond to any of Egg's letters since I put the account in dispute. Anyway, they sent a doorstep caller to my house asking for me. A relative told them that I no longer live at the address but the caller posted a letter through the door. The company is called 'Field Call' and their purpose was to get me to contact Egg.

 

As the account is in dispute, I was under the impression that they cannot send callers to my property.

 

I am now living overseas and am going to write to them stating that they are in breach and give them my new overseas address to avoid any possible CCJ action at a UK address. What's the best template to follow this breach up with?

 

Basically Egg went quiet for a while saying that they 'lost' my 'complaint', then they closed the complaint and just followed protocol with their collections process.

 

If I do nothing, even though the agreement is unenforcable, can they still start CCJ proceedings? What is the best approach?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evidently your DCA is not convinced you are abroad, or how long you will be abroad. When they are convinced it is doubtful they will pursue a small debt for doubtful reward at high cost of time and effort. Any CCJ handed down by a court without giving you a chance to defend against same can be routinely set aside after the event. Even so it would be bad to have your credit rating blackened by CCJ for any period of time. If you do not return for 6 years, then your liability will eventually fade beyond the 6-year civil limitation imposed by statute.

 

UK loose ends while living abroad is a specialist subject which many readers have explored and posted upon. Suggest you:

 

Go to the blue bar at the top of CAG screen,

click SEARCH

click ADVANCED SEARCH

input ABROAD as search key, searching in title only.

click start search.

 

You will find many threads and many answers. Good luck.

Edited by Mistermind

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mistermind. I have not entered into any correspondence with DCA's and no creditors are aware that I live overseas hence why they are turning up at my UK property. All UK mail just gets returned to sender. I have been advised that I need to write to them all and tell them that I am living abroad.

 

However upon reading all the posts with 'ABROAD' in the title, I am reluctant to give them my new address and was thinking up a setting up a PO box in my new country of residence (which is an EU member state).

 

Also, at the same time I feel that I am wasting my time in writing to Egg as I have already made it clear that the account is in dispute until they come up with legit cca. They have totally ignored my letters and have continued to chase me and send callers to my property.

 

Also even if they do manage to come up with a legit CCA, I have no job /money so I cannot pay them a penny anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mistermind. I have not entered into any correspondence with DCA's and no creditors are aware that I live overseas hence why they are turning up at my UK property. All UK mail just gets returned to sender. I have been advised that I need to write to them all and tell them that I am living abroad.

 

However upon reading all the posts with 'ABROAD' in the title, I am reluctant to give them my new address and was thinking up a setting up a PO box in my new country of residence (which is an EU member state).

 

Also, at the same time I feel that I am wasting my time in writing to Egg as I have already made it clear that the account is in dispute until they come up with legit cca. They have totally ignored my letters and have continued to chase me and send callers to my property.

 

Also even if they do manage to come up with a legit CCA, I have no job /money so I cannot pay them a penny anyway.

A High Court Test Case ruling within the last two months established that creditors who do not comply with CCA request may continue with debt-chasing activities, e.g. DN, blackalling, phone calls etc. Creditors simply cannot get CCJ without a full court hearing. It is not even established that the absence of CCA cannot be overcome by the judge accepting the debt claim on "the balance of probabilities". This vital question still awaits a test case verdict.

 

I see no point in giving them your overseas address, it will simply encourage them. A letter sent with an EU stamp and credible franking will suffice to calm the frantic ardour of creditors so that they do not keep visiting your old address. If your relations return any letters that may be less convincing as the DCA may think relations are in cohoots with you and that you are actually upstairs?

 

Once Egg has passed an account to a DCA they tend not to bother any more. They just say to the DCA, get on with it and collect as much as you can. Reasoning with Egg by writing long letters would be a waste of effort. Once a customer is categorised by Egg, they simply trigger the nearest-fitting template letter. Very doubtful any Egg human will spend more than one minute to read a letter. Modern financial fimrs are all IT automated now, no more human touch or discretion. Not surprising as Egg has or had over 2 milliont cardholders.

 

You are broke? Ha ha ha, join the western world, most governments are in reality bankrupt now, printing money and surviving only by a mutual agreement, that if I do not press you too hard you will not press me too hard.

 

Good luck with a job in the EU !

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again.

 

So if I send a letter to Egg telling them that the account is still in dispute and now permantely living overseas with no job or income, they will pass this info on to the DCA and stop visiting the uk address?

 

I plan on sending it tracked and as advised omitting my address.

 

Just as a side note: a simple search of my credit report reveals that I have a mortgage in the UK and regular payments are still being made. Therefore if I was a DCA I would keep trying at that address rather accept that I moved away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again.

 

So if I send a letter to Egg telling them that the account is still in dispute and now permantely living overseas with no job or income, they will pass this info on to the DCA and stop visiting the uk address?

 

I plan on sending it tracked and as advised omitting my address.

 

Just as a side note: a simple search of my credit report reveals that I have a mortgage in the UK and regular payments are still being made. Therefore if I was a DCA I would keep trying at that address rather accept that I moved away.

All creditors are focused on verdicts from the Test Cases, and the OFT will unveil their official Guidance in April. Whether Egg pays even a particle of attention to "In Dispute" letters is questionable. Once an account is passed over to a DCA, doubtful if Egg will bother to rein back the DCA.

 

If you have a house in the UK and mortgage payments are still being made, it is hard to see well-informed DCAs losing hope about collecting or trying for CCJ and Charge Order. Until you return, possibly they may be forced to delay a court case.

 

But also possible they may make a big stink with your relations. For the pressure to encourage you to make a payment agreement with them and be rid of the endless pursuit.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...