Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim form Received today


darcus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4843 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Please help.

I sent HBOS a CCA request on the 2nd of January to which they sent the Postal Order back saying that it didnt have the name on it, I wrote Halifax on it and sent it back with a new CCA request letter on 27th January.

To date, I have not received a response from Halifax. The CCA request was pertaining to an alleged credit card debt.

 

This evening after coming home from work, I received a Claim Form from Northampton County Court. The particulars of the claim read:

 

By agreement(s) entered into between the Claimant and Defendant, the Defendant has failed to pay the sum of £XXXXX. The Claimant has requested payment but the Defendant has failed to pay the full sum demanded. The Claimant claims the sum of £XXXXX and interest under s.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from 17/02/2009 until judgment or sooner payment. Costs. The claim does not include issues under the Human Rights Act 1998.

 

The claimant is Bank of Scotland plc, the claimaints solicitor is Irwin Mitchell.

 

Please advise as to what I do next. I am really scared. I am a homeowner. I had to downgrade my job at the end of 2006 and stupidly started living off my credit cards, my income fell from £32k per annum to £20k pa. I have been with the CCCS who recommended I only pay £1 per month because of my basic outgoings. My girlfriend no longer wants to be with me and I can't provide for my son. I don't know what to do.

I have a meeting with the Citizens Advice Bureau next week to whom I will be taking this paperwork to in Birmingham.

 

I wish I had the money to pay these guys, but I can't. They haven't responded to my CCA request. I haven't sent them a follow up letter. Can someone please advise me as to what I have to do next? Please, I can't afford a solicitor, I can barely afford to get to work. I work in the financial services industry and having a CCJ could force my employer to sack me. I am in commercial finance. If I become bankrupt, I will lose everything I have, I have a mortgage of £86k which is paid fine, and a secured loan of £28k which is paid, my house is now only worth £100k, maybe less, so negative equity. What can I do?

 

I hope someone can help here.

d

Edited by 42man
deleted due to poster being potentially identitfied
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi, please don't worry too much as I am sure we can help in some way. How long have you had the card? If several years then they may not have a valid CCA. It seems odd that they returned your request for a rather vague reason and then miraculously issued a court claim.

 

Are you paying them £1 a month?

 

You must remember that you need to respond to the court claim within 14 days.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I'm sh*tting my load at the moment. Times are really tough and I can't afford to lose my job, first the missus, then the job, then the house, then life... i dont know what to do. dont have £16 let alone £16k.

I am paying them £1 a month at the moment on standing order.

My request for a CCA have been ignored and I have now received this claim form from the court. Can anyone advise on what i have to do...

Also, in responding to the court within 14 days - what do I do? How do I respond? I've gone through the threads but I don't understand. Nothing is clear right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are many many people in the same situation as you. Not that that's much consolation, but please try not to worry too much.

 

If you are paying them, admittedly not a lot considering the size of the debt, but all you can afford at the moment the court will take a dim view of them issuing proceedings.

 

I would wait and see what the CAB suggest next week. They might try and sort it out direct with the bank. I am not sure what they will advise but what I would do is send back the court claim saying you intend to fully defend the claim and then send the claimant a letter under the civil procedure rules (will find it if you need it) asking them for full information about the account, copy of the original agreement, full statements etc etc. If they haven't complied with your CCA request so far there is a chance they do not have it, and they need it to proceed with the court claim.

 

Keep strong:)

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi darcus

 

Firstly, stop creating dirty laundry!

 

Second, as goldlady points out, there are many people out there in the same position. here we try to help each other as well. You should acknowledge service of the claim form. You can do this on line. Follow the instructions that came with the claim form. The password is on the claim form itself.

 

Third, get some further information from HBOS. Don't bother with a CCA request or a SAR under the Data Protection Act. They take too long and it's a bit late. Instead, use the courts rules (Civil Procedure Rules or CPR) to get documents. i suugest a letter using CPR 31 might be appropriate. An example is below -

 

Dear Sir,

 

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name) Case No:

CPR 31.14 Request

 

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the (Name) County Court.

 

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

 

[Prior to the issue of proceedings I had delivered a request for the production of the agreement mentioned in the Claim Form and on which you rely. That request was ignored][delete if no such request was delivered]

 

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

 

1 the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

2 the assignment*

 

3 the default notice*

 

4 the termination notice*

 

5 [any other documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim]*

 

* delete if not mentioned in the Particulars of claim.

 

[Although your claim is for a sum which is not more than £5,000.00 and will in all likelihood be allocated to the small claims track for determination upon my delivering a defence, at this moment in time I have not delivered my defence and the case has not been allocated to a track. In consequence the provisions of CPR 27(2) are of no effect and you should not seek to avoid compliance with your CPR 31 duties by claiming otherwise]#

 

# delete if claim for a sum exceeding £5,000.00

 

You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31 duties and ensure that the document(s) I have requested are copied to and received by me within 7 days of receiving this letter. Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy. Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

 

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligation to recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of a third party.

 

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

 

If you require more time in which to comply with this request you must tell me in writing. You must tell me before the time for compliance with this request has expired. In telling me you require more time you must tell me what steps you have taken and propose to take in order to comply with this request and also state a date by when you will comply with this request. In addition your statement must be accompanied with a statement that you agree to an extension of the time for me to file my defence. Your extension of time must be not less than 14 days from the date when you say you will have complied with my request and you must state the new date for filing my defence.

 

If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.

 

Please note that if you should fail to comply with this request, fail to request more time or fail to agree to an extension of time for the filing of my defence, I will make an application to the court for an order that the proceedings be struck out or stayed for non-compliance and a summary costs order.

 

I do hope this will not be necessary and look forward to hearing from you.

 

yours faithfully

 

 

Send this letter by recorded delivery ('Signed For' in Royal Mail speak). Sign your name electronically, use an unusual font and put it in italics.

 

Fourth, sit back and relax for the next two weeks. There is nothing else you can do for now. In a couple of weeks, you will need to draft a defence. Come back and people will help.

  • Haha 1

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good advice here....if you want to defend the claim, then you must acknowledge service within 14 days of the date on the claim form, then you get a further 14+3 days in which to submit your defence....it is too early to do your defence as you need to see if they respond to your CPR above....

 

As for the CPR letter you need to send this recorded to the opposing solicitors but delete number 2, as the debt has not been assigned (i.e. sold to a debt collection agency)

 

As this is over £5k then you'll also need to delete this bit

 

[Although your claim is for a sum which is not more than £5,000.00 and will in all likelihood be allocated to the small claims track for determination upon my delivering a defence, at this moment in time I have not delivered my defence and the case has not been allocated to a track. In consequence the provisions of CPR 27(2) are of no effect and you should not seek to avoid compliance with your CPR 31 duties by claiming otherwise]#

 

Just keep a close eye on the timescales and have a read of this thread here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/159445-getting-them-reveal-their.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Acknowleding online is easier, quicker & cheaper and you can print off a confirmation.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure when you acknowledge that you tick you intend to defend ALL of the claim, dont enter a defence yet....come back to this thread, we need a few more details when you have done that.

 

Oh two more things, dont sign any letters,just type your name, and dont speak to them on the phone.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have been in hospital for the last few days, and just come out today. I received the following from Halifax:

img106.jpg

img107.jpg

img108a.jpg

img109.jpg

img110.jpg

img111.jpg

img112.jpg

img113.jpg

img114.jpg

 

hope the above worked fine. I havent yet acknowledged the claim nor have I sent the letter, because I was rushed to hospital. please advise.

Edited by darcus
Forgot to edit one of the images...
Link to post
Share on other sites

They look like their current terms, and the 'agreement' piece does not have any prescribed terms, unenforceable in my opinion (although a judge may favour you or not !!)

 

A valid credit agreement must contain certain terms within the signature document (s.60(1)(2) CCA 1974). These core terms are the credit limit, repayment terms and the rate of interest (SI 1983/1553 (6 Signing of agreement) which states that the prescribed terms must be within the signature document. (Column 2 schedule 6). s.61(1)(a) states the agreement must contain all the prescribed terms and be signed by both the debtor and on behalf of the creditor.

 

Further, s.127(3) CCA 1974 makes the account unenforceable if it is not in the proper form and content or improperly executed.

 

In Wilson and another v Hurstanger Ltd (2007) it was stated “In my judgment the objective of Schedule 6 is to ensure that, as an inflexible condition of enforceability, certain basic minimum terms are included which the parties … and/or the court can identify within the four corners of the agreement. Those minimum provisions combined with the requirement under s.61 that all the terms should be in a single document, and backed up by the provisions of section 127(3), ensure that these core terms are expressly set out in the agreement itself: they cannot be orally agreed; they cannot be found in another document; they cannot be implied; and above all they cannot be in the slightest mis-stated. As a matter of policy, the lender is denied any room for manoeuvre in respect of them. On the other hand, they are basic provisions, and the only question for the court is whether they are, on a true construction, included in the agreement”.

 

 

 

is this in response to the CCA request or the CPR 31.14 ? do you know ? If it's in response to the CPR then they have failed to provide the default notice.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, this is in reply to the CCA request.

The first two pages above were on the same piece of paper. It shows that there are rates there.

Shall i acknowledge the claim online and do the CPR request?

 

Also, everything after page 2 was stapled together, it only had my name and address on the first page - there were no signatures or anything...

 

Thanks for the rapid response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to defend then yes, keep a close eye on the timescales, send out the CPR by RECORDED delivery...acknowledge the claim within 14 days of the date on the claim form.....it is too early to submit a defence, but as I said above keep a close eye on the timescales....and please do read as much as you can on these forums....BUT be aware you might possibly be in for a fight, so it is a risk....and judges can vary wildly..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that agreement is not enforceable for what its worth, there is no link on the page you signed to the second page, and the first page contains no prescribed terms.

 

I suggest you acknowledge service, tick you intend to defend ALL of the claim, print off a receipt.

Send the CPR letter, don't sign it, just type your name

 

Everything 42man says above is valid.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

I've sent the CPR request above recorded first class...

...and acknowledged the request online.

Fingers crossed now. I'm not sure about what to do next, but lets see and what they come back with, I will upload and hope someone can help.

You've all been a great help with this, when Im busy doing something it relieves the stress a little...

Thank you again.

Edited by darcus
Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers for your help 42 - i've been glued to this forum since I found it - I've been looking through the thread you've mentioned. I don't understand most of it which has been the problem, but I'm muddling through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

are they allow to claim this, I don't think so it a regulated consumer credit agreement.

 

No they are not allowed to claim it, but its a side issue really, if they don't have an enforceable agreement

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

The date on the claim form is 18th February. Is that 33 working days or normal days? I sent the CPR this afternoon, they will have it tomorrow. Hopefully I will get the right information from them in time for someone to help me prepare a defence...

Will I need to go to court and talk through the defence or can it get dealt with by post?

Ta

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...