Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
    • My expectation was their WS would include the best paperwork, like at least true copies of originals, but these just look wrong somehow, perhaps the font and size of font... Not sending me the DN in CCA request but producing it for evidence I would argue could be a tactic used by them... - Page 11 with ticks - there is no reference to IP addresses - Home addresses are correct for dates in documents   Just looking up example Defendant WS's while awaiting your thoughts on this
    • Hello lovely, just posting to check in to see how you are feeling now? Hopefully your feeling better? 
    • Sorry my redactions made it harder dx. Tick dates are 11/12/2014
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Yet another home learning college thread :(


m.b764
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5555 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So, im in a bit of a situation !

I signed up to this "home learning college" course, about 12 - 13 months ago ish, for an MCDST course costing about 1,700 altogetehr, payable over 2 years or so , at 70 pound a month.

The material which i'm working through is worded really .. well weird, and its too hard to grasp imo

 

I have lost my job since christmas, have not been bothering with the coures at all, so have cancelled the direct debit through the bank, and informed the college.

 

Upon researching the company, i found this from the guardian.. although the article is fairly old..

 

 

 

 

 

"Learning a valuable lesson about consumer credit

 

I am a 27-year-old woman wanting to return to work after producing two children - and needing to upgrade my skills. I saw an article in another newspaper suggesting The Learning Library could help me. It said it was one of the biggest firms in distance learning.

 

I signed up for a computer course which cost nearly £1,200. And as I did not have much money, I agreed to an interest-free credit deal with Empress Finance recommended by the Library.

 

But since then, I have been very disappointed both by the course material and by the responses to my problems with it. I really don't want to spend any more on this but Empress threatens if I stop, it will take me to court. Can you help me?

RS, Coventry

 

· Empress will not be able to take you to court as the credit arrangement it has is not legally enforceable. Under the Consumer Credit Act, The Learning Library, whose controversial activities have featured here twice in recent weeks, should have a consumer credit licence to introduce business to Empress.

 

It does not have one, so agreements will not stand up in court or be otherwise enforceable against the debtor without an Order granted by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT). This is unlikely. While The Learning Library has made a recent application for a licence, the OFT has issued a "minded to refuse notice."

 

Empress, which is not a limited UK company, holds licence 378218 in the name of Olivia Susan Webb as a sole trader. Companies House records show 80 of 100 issued shares in The Learning Library belonging to Robert Edward Webb, now 55. A further 10 have been issued to Moira Simpson, 48.

 

In May 1999, Webb and Simpson were found guilty at Snaresbrook Crown Court of "common law cheat, conspiracy to cheat and false accounting". They had formed a complex plan using the government's Vocation Training Relief Scheme to defraud the Inland Revenue of £1.9m through The Learning Library. In November 2000, Webb was sentenced to four and a half years' imprisonment.

 

The OFT has issued a "minded to revoke notice" for Empress's licence, although that is subject to appeal. Credit agreements with Empress would still be valid providing the introduction had come from a licensed broker and not the unlicensed The Learning Library."

 

 

The company have changed there name numerous times - Home learning college, home learning direct, learning library, oakhouse college, etc. And the finance company is part of the same group by the looks of it.

 

I was just how the best way to go about this is ?

They've already tried to phone me numerous times today, but I haven't answered.

 

Thanks in advance for your replied :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya, I ripped up my contract and threw it away. But if this Empress thing is now the Home Learning College then it says in that letter you pasted that it CANNOT go to court then this sounds like a scare tactic. Pay up or you'll be punished, because alot of people quail at the idea of being taken to court and this is good way to get money off them, especially if they have rubbish software. I didnt install mine because due to circumstances had to leave my flat

 

My guess? They're trying to scare you into paying up by pulling the 'you can't cancel' card. Like they're trying to scare me. I will not pay up with money I dont have simply because I refuse to be pushed around. I am surprised they have been allowed to get away with it this long. If they dont have that sort of license then they can't take you to court.

 

Ignore the calls and use my advice in my thread - tell them you lost the cancellation slip and was unable to cancel. Then ignore the calls. I'm glad you cancelled the direct debit as well, that's what I did. I had no choice

 

I will be here most days if you need any help :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...