Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with Rockwell/Lewis Group/Argos Card


davebham1982
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5463 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

This is my first post on here.

 

A while back I was made redundant while I had an outstanding debt on an Argos Card. I was aware that in the event of losing your job the best thing to do is to tell the company you owe money to and to come to an agreement. I told the argos lot this and i've been paying £10 per month. However i've recieved a letter from Rockwell saying that that my agreement with them has expired and to avoid them taking action please call their pre-legal dept.

 

So I cancelled the direct debit that came out monthly and endeavoured to find the money they requested paid in full.

 

However today I noticed a new direct debit on the 29th of January for £11.86 to The Lewis Group that I had no knowledge of. I've called up my bank and they said if I owe the company and I have an agreement then they are entitled to do that.

 

Can anyone help me with what to do next as I dont trust these people as far as I could throw them.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send off letter 'N' from here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

You need to send this to whoever owns the debt, send it with a £1 postal order and send recorded, if they don't send this within 12+2 working days then they are in default of your request and cannot enforce the debt (although some will try !!)....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask to speak to a superviser, whoever told you such rot is speaking out of their derriere. DDs can be cancelled at anytime. Tell them you do not have an agreement and that you have not authorised the mandate and that any 'charges' incurred because of this unauthorised & illegal DD will be the banks responsibility not yours. Then ask him for a copy of their complaints procedure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorted out the Direct Debit.

 

And I am sending out a letter n from the templates tomorrow morning by recorded delivery with a postal order.

 

However I was just wondering what do I do next?

 

What happens if they dont reply in 12+2 days? Also is that business days or normal days? As the credit companys seem to count weekends when they want something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's straight days, they have two working weeks + one weekend which = the 12 days. The + 2 days is just extra time that you have allowed if a second weekend falls into the time frame.

 

If they fail to supply The CCA in this time limit you can send the 'In Dispute' letter & you will be legally entitled to withold any payment until they comply to your request.

 

BTW, did you have any difficulty with the DD the second time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No there wasnt a problem with the DD.

 

So basically they either comply in the time limit and I get a statement of whats gone on with the account and then I can talk about an arrangement/settling the account or they dont send me the proof and what next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is rare for that to happen, but if it does payment would be due from that date. But they wouldn't be permitted to add interest or charges for the intervening time period.

 

Also if six years elapses between the last payment & them miraculously finding it, it would be statute barred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've recieved a letter last friday saying that they couldnt locate the documents and returned my postal order and saying they have closed their file.

 

I've sent the same letter off for my brother as he had two similar letters and he's recieved one asking for comfimation of address on one account and offering 50 and 25 off on the others if settled right away.

 

Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are offering a discount like that the chances are they don't have a CCA for those accounts either.

 

How can they ask for confirmation of an address they've already written to, or was he living elsewhere when he had that account? If it was a different address all he has to do is say what that address was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Some more advice needed plz.

 

As I said earlier in the thread I recieved a letter from Rockwell debt collection agency saying that they couldnt provide the documents requested in the letter and that my file has been closed and returned the £1.00 postal order which was sent on the 9th of February.

 

Today I recieved a letter from another company called Moorcroft Debt Recovery Limited after the same debt.

 

What should I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send Moorcroft this with a copy of the letter from Rockwell;

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Your Reference:

Client reference:

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

I must admit that I am rather bemused as to why this account has been passed to you, as it is in dispute with ***DCA*** and has been since ***Date***

Not only is this a breach of OFT collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Data Protection Act 1998

 

 

As ***DCA*** is now in default of my Consumer Credit Act request, Office of Fair Trading Collection Guidelines and s10 Data Protection Act request, I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

 

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default, enforcement action is NOT permitted; under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law. Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to ***DCA*** for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as ***DCA*** cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

 

If ***DCA***chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

 

I hope that this will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Quick update.

 

I've heard nothing back from Moorcroft or Rockwell and its been ages what do I do now?

 

Also the advice for my brother seemed to work apart from that Aktiv Kapital have instructed a Solicitiors called Buchanan Clark and Wells to write to him. He's going to scan the letter and send it to me but he's a bit busy looking after his 3 year old and his pregnant wife whos due in a month. However theres been no copy of the credit agreement or anything like that.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...