Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The case against the US-based ride-hailing giant is being brought on behalf of over 10,800 drivers.View the full article
    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Someone else (unknown) has registered my car in their name


d.stockdale
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5567 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I bought a car, registered it in my name and let a family member use it. Unbeknown to me they subsequently lost their driving licence after incurring penalty points and 'loaned' the car to one of their friends. The cars documentation was apparently in its glovebox, and i'm assuming this has been used to register the car in someone elses name. That friend has either sold the car or registered it in their name. Naturally, I want the car back as all this was done without my knowledge, but the DVLA and Police have been unable to help.

 

I've contacted the DVLA to ask who the car is currently registered to, but they returned my cheque saying that they do not get involved in supplying details, even though i'm the rightful owner of the vehicle.

I've contacted the Police who told me that this is a civil matter, not a matter that they can deal with.

 

All very frustrating, can anyone suggest how I can a) find out who's got my car; b) Get it back!

 

Kind Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

It shows you how important it is to keep the V5 safe. As you had the car insured, why not tell your insurer that you have no idea of its whereabouts. They may not pay up as it was 'stolen' with the keys, but they could provide useful info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly your first course of action would be against your relative who borrowed it.

 

They were responsible for it and they allowed it to be taken from them (or loaned it out) which I presume that you did not give them authority to do.

 

since the car has not been returned then it is stolen and I would register it with the police as such

 

Why can you not ask your relative where it is?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would also be quesioning the DVLA as to why they accepted the change of details on the reg doc without your signature as there is a sellers and buyers signature box

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you have been deprived of the use of your property, and without consent I'd certainly assert it HAS been 'stolen'. As for the DVLA is happy to pass on RK details on the flimsiest of excuses, I'd suggest you make an RK enquiry, stating that you have reasonable cause to believe your vehicle has been stolen and re-registered and you require the details to permit legal recovery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is important to remember that the name on the V5 is that of the registered keeper - not the owner; although in the majority of cases, they will be one and the same person, they remain different legal entities.

 

So regardless of to whom the car is now registered, you remain the rightful owner. I trust that you have paperwork to prove that (invoice, receipt, etc.).

 

I would go back to the Police and inform them in no uncertain terms that it is not a civil matter, your car has been stolen and you want action.

 

I would also follow Buzby's advice and deal as he suggests with the DVLA - in writing. What you need is the first instance is a form V888 (downloadable from the DVLA website here) . Complete that and make the justification as Buzby says above. if you have a receipt, attach a copy as proof of ownership.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As PatD suggests, there is absolutely no reason for you to roll over and be deprived of the use of your vehicle because it wasn;t taken from you by force. There are too many instances of civilian staff at police stations doing all they can to suggest anything (and everything) is a 'civil matter', whilst there may be times this would be a legitimate response, in your case I think we're all agreed that this isn't, and you need to track your property down ASAP! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Point out to DVLA that they are not supposed to accept a V5 for change of keeper unless it's signed by the existing keeper (ie: you) and I assume you didn't leave the V5 in the glovebox already signed for a transfer?.

 

Also, if a V5 is requested by a new keeper because the old one is "lost" they are supposed to confirm the transfer with the person on their records (again you). I assume they didn't get in touch when it was re-registered?

 

Given that, and the fact that it has been stolen - borrowing something and then disposing of is as if it's your own is theft according to the Theft Act 1968 S.3 - you have every right to be given the current details.

 

As has been mentioned, you also have every right to have the police involved in tracing it.

 

edited to add: Note that the thief in this case is your family member, not their friend. However, if the friend was aware, or should reasonably have been aware, of the situation (such as by the V5 having your name on it) then they may also be guilty of handling stolen goods

Edited by Spunkymonkey

:!:Nothing I post should be taken as legal advice. It is offered as an opinion only.:!:

 

This warning is in my signature because I'm not organised enough to remember to type

it in every post.

 

And you're considering trusting me????:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for the advice, it is appreciated and has made me feel more positive about resolving the issue. First off I will write to the DVLA again, but this time include receipts and point out that I have never signed any change of ownership paperwork that they have clearly processed. If I get registration details information from them I'll go back to the Police armed with that (and the fact that the vehicle has been taken without my consent) and try to get them to do something to aid legal recovey.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why aren't you reporting it as stolen even before you get the DVLA details? You can take that new info into teh police later, but at the moment, irrelevant of what is on the DVLA database, the car remains stolen.

 

If you present your legal status to the police anyway, they should be able to access the DVLA info instantly and they will know who/where the car is supposed to be with now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...