Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot Financial - Chasing for 10 year old debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4636 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Wow, nice forum very unbiased I call the CSA get proper advise paste the responce and all I get is abuse !! you should get the correct facts so people don't shout incorrect facts and then find themselves un stuck google true copy and then abuse me

 

That would be the same CSA whose past president was a CEO of First Credit a company which was reprimanded by the office of fair trading. Don't make me laugh you troll. The only interests the CSA are interested in is that of the pond life DCAs they represent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

singleno - anagram of 'complete tw*t'. No? Well, it should be.

 

All your posts seem to be cut-and-paste jobs praising DCAs and the CSA. Are you a friend of 'cheerup'?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/member.php?u=286747

 

There seems to be a small influx of trolls at the moment. Must be tough out there at the moment, so much time on your hands. And my, they're so sensitive.

 

Mind you, you've probably gone home now. Cabot finish early, don't they? Muppet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does trollspeak have such bad grammar?

They must unplug the communal half a brain cell they share when taking up station behind impotent threat phone.

 

Exterminate exterminate exterminate exterminate

 

oilyrag.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

...where is their morality?

 

Thats a very good point

 

Who gives a flying feck about morality:rolleyes:

 

These DCA`s are gamblers pure & simple, if you purchase debts & people use the LAW of the land to ask you [ DCA] to PROVE that the debt can be legally collected & then find out it cant................... whoops your horse has fallen at the first fence.

Tuff luck, stop gambling on debts & get into another business.

I have never paid one penny to these chancers & despite there threats not one has ever taken me to court.......... i sleep soundly with my set of morals

 

 

myself too...and i have never parted with a penny since finding my way to CAG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gawd, they are getting desperate sending the trolls again. Come on Cerebus where is the troll spray?

 

regards

oilyrag.:)

 

Looks like it has been sprayed and done the trick.

 

Would it be too much to ask the mods that every time a troll is spotted that his employer is named and shamed

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't used the pesticide yet. ;)

Would it be too much to ask the mods that every time a troll is spotted that his employer is named and shamed
The clue to who they are is in the thread I would have thought, a pound to a penny if they defend a particular DCA they work for them. :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't used the pesticide yet. ;)The clue to who they are is in the thread I would have thought, a pound to a penny if they defend a particular DCA they work for them. :)

 

Or in the case of Simpleton, the CSA

Edited by ODC

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
However, credit card companies usually send a copy of the application form (often without a signature) and a copy of current Terms and Conditions, which fully complies with the 1983 regulations.

 

Why not just repay your Debt ?? You took the card out spent the money why avoid it I don't understand please let this site help people who need help not the wont pays who chose to avoid for no other reason

I think you are missing the point-the question is whether it is legal or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...