Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCj's the only option for us??? Help us!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5565 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please please contact your banks with an Income/Expenditure form and a letter explaining you cannot afford to keep up these payments. Don't use a company to do it, it is possible, free and quick to do it yourself - either using the templates on here or via CCCS or one of the other free debt help centres.

 

You can ask for interest/charges to be frozen, and with the amount you have available pay them a pro-rata or preferably a token amount.

 

You need to make sure you include realistic figures though - a family of 4 can not be expected to survive on under £70 for 3 weeks groceries, and you must make sure you have enough for heating. We have 2 young children, so I know you must be going spare with worry about the cold, let alone everything else. If that leaves you with £1 to offer your creditors, then that's what you offer, not a penny more.

 

The very important thing to remember here is that if they don't accept this from you, the worst they can do is the very thing you are thinking of asking for yourself. And, if that did happen, the court will simply order you to pay what you can afford, not what the bank wants.

 

Also, as you live in rented accommodation not only can creditors not apply for charging orders etc, but I'm pretty sure they can't send bailiffs in either as the contents of the house could belong to the landlord.

 

Purely from reading your very sad story I would very much agree with Goldlady; you could and should offer them a token payment of £1 a month. There is a template letter available here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html. I would suggest letter C rather than B, as it reads to me that you need every bit of money you're currently paying the banks.

 

Next I would contact your utilities suppliers and see if they have a hardship program that you could be placed on. If they don't I would try and switch if you can. There are a few companies who can help, although the only one I can remember at the moment is EDF.

 

There is also a trust fund run by United Utilities. They offer a (non-repayable) grant to qualifying people in need - United Utilities Trust Fund

 

Additionally, this thread may be of interest to you - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/utilities-gas-electricity-water/100405-utilities-trust-fund.html

 

Definitely go to the link that the main man has given you as you really need to find out what you can claim. As you are in rented accomodation Housing benefit may be applicable. If the online calculators don't show you being entitled to anything, but also don't give you the opportunity to input the maintenance you are paying, it would probably be worth giving your local council a ring and asking them directly if you would be eligible, taking that into account.

 

Lastly, please try not to feel ashamed about this (sooo easy to say I know). You don't have much money, that's all. And that's about 99% of the people on this forum who, to a greater or lesser extent are in the same position. No one here is judging you:)

  • Haha 1

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

by request of DFH, but was asked by them not to show increased bills ie bigger gas/food/electric because they would have to re-negotiate with the creditors and this would take time

 

I'm sorry but that is unbelievable, and this company should not be allowed to continue if this is how they 'help' people in debt.

 

I am completely incensed that they would have told you that. It's not only irresponsible, but it's also asking you to lie on your I/E form.

 

Quite apart from that, put simply they are telling you that because they won't pull their finger out of their ***** and do what you are paying them to do, you and your family have to go without heat and a grocery budget!

 

Did they do this in writing or on the phone?

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again

 

How long did that take you to type?:)

 

Okie dokie - Deep breath now, it's a long one:D

 

First off, if you can bear a bit of hassle (a lot to ask when you feel like you're drowning I know), you could really do with dumping the 'professional' (and I use that word quite wrongly!) company and going it alone.

 

You will more than likely get a lot of phone calls when you start, but as long as you keep sending the 'no phone calls letter' (which most people on here will likely have a template for that you can use), they do eventually tail off. For the period before they do though, you simply get the name of who is calling and then repeat the mantra 'I do not talk about financial matters on the phone. Please write' until they hang up. If you can't face talking, just keep a log of the phone number, time called and date called every time you are phoned. Oh, and if you can possibly manage it, a recorder for the phone is a very good idea.

 

Letters will be sent which will scare the pants off you, threatening all sorts. When that happens you come on here, either scan or write what has been sent, and then find out that it is just an empty threat and you can deal with it easily. I haven't had a letter yet that some kind soul on here has not been able to dispatch for me with a suitable response if I've been worried.

 

The creditors refusing to deal with the CAB is very poor, and against OFT guidelines, but that's only to be expected.

 

lexis200, it took months and months for the creditors to cave in, HSBc spent months demanding £300 a month off us, (theyre old payments) then they asked for £150 a month, months later they finally wore down and accepted £74.09p a month through DFH, they will FLIP with rage when i offer them a pound a month, i'll be in court so fast i'll feel like my feet are dancing! (but i am not worried, court is inevitable!) sooner or later
That's really not necessarily true. For a start, in the big scheme of things most of your debt is reasonably small amounts (apart from the HSBC one) spread over a lot of cards to equal one big debt. This means it becomes less worth it for the banks to take you to court, as it costs them to start legal action. Also, if your I/E shows your actual income and expenditure (you know, like enough to enable you to heat your home!), as opposed to the ones you were told to put, they will be able to see you do not have spare cash. This may well not make them any more sympathetic, but if it does go down the court route how kindly is a judge going to take to a creditor insisting you pay them rather than keep your kids fed and warm? Even HSBC with the big debt will not be awarded any more by a judge than you can afford, so if you have no assets to sell or house to get a charging order on, there's not much incentive for them to do it.

 

Also, it's not like you make a smaller payment one month and the next you're in front of a judge. OH has been paying MBNA the amount he can afford for the last 7/8 months, not what they want. We've had 20+ letters from them - very few phonecalls really though after telling them to go away - but they are nowhere near court action. BOS have not been paid for a few months due to unenforceable agreements, but they too are not seeming eager to go to court. It was threatened on one account, but after a superb letter (from another member) was sent, not a peep from them. Obviously not all banks will be the same, but it's not something they seem to jump into with any great speed.

 

I believe a lot of it comes down to the circumstances you give them. I had a pretty sh**ty run of luck when I became ill and my OH lost his job due to taking off to much time to look after me and our (then) baby. When I eventually got the guts up to write and ask them for help (this took literally years of living on the edge - we'd already lost our home and gained another child by the time I did it!), all but one accepted my pro-rata offers (ironically the 'ethical' bank:rolleyes:). The letter I sent gave a completely true account of the state of affairs, but I steered away from being too personal - just gave them the facts. Two of my cards totalled more than your whole debt currently stands at (OH had a good job previously so credit was no issue), but I pay them less than £50 a month between them, which is what I can just about afford. If I could only afford £1, that is all they would be getting, regardless of how loud they shout.

 

I'm unsure as to why your utility company wouldn't let you switch due to someone else's non-payment? Unless they were expecting you to pay, I don't see their reasoning here. Anyone else have any ideas why this might have been done? If it was a while ago though, it may be worth another phone call to them. If they still won't play ball, perhaps they have a hardship plan they could put you on?

 

Bankruptcy - this is from the National Debtline book that they sent me

Bankruptcy is really a last resort and most creditors are unlikely to make you bankrupt. You must owe £750 or more to that creditor before they can make you bankrupt. It costs them money in court fees and they are unlikely to get the debt paid back to them unless you have assets that can be sold to pay your debts. The aim of bankruptcy is to claim assets that can go towards paying off your creditors. Once you are bankrupt, your creditors can usually take no further action against you.

 

You can make yourself bankrupt but the fees are high (Court fees £150, petition fees £345).

 

Bankruptcy can be a solution if you owe a lot of money, have no assets, and can see no way of ever paying the debts off. You are made bankrupt for normally up to one year. Usually debts that have not been paid are then written off and you are 'discharged' from the bankruptcy. You may still have to make monthly payments for a total of three years under the terms of your bankruptcy order.

 

I don't see any reason though why you would need to go down that route yet, if at all. You may find you have unenforceable agreements, and hopefully in the meantime you will be able to reduce your payments and chuck the DMP company who seem to be very adept at not getting you out of this mess!

 

Hopefully not all of that was ramble and some of it will be of help - assuming of course you've not fallen asleep in the middle of reading it!;)

 

Lexis:)

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again

 

I'm glad it helped a bit.

 

The only reason I was harping on about the utilities is not so much to save you £20 over the course of the year, but more because if you are with the right company they could possibly help you with actual payments. EDF for example have an energy trust and may be able to grant a lump sum towards a future bill, just giving you a bit of breathing space. EDF Energy Trust - About Us: a history of the EDF Energy Trust

I thought it was them who had the tariff for people on low income, but I can't actually find it now so it may have been another company.

 

Certainly though starting to deal with the main debts will at the very least make you feel better. Personally, I found that once the first letter had gone out I had a wave of relief. Even if the result isn't quite what you expect, you will most likely feel better simply by knowing one way or another!

 

I've no idea about the consolidation question I'm afraid, so I'll leave that to the rather more knowledgeable bods on here.

 

Good luck with your uploading:D Don't forget to obscure all personal details, and any ref. numbers that may be showing!

 

Lexis:)

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I completely missed the bit about you not taking your medication due to the cost of scripts, but as Cadencealex said, missing important drugs is a big problem (been there, done that, got very sick because of it!)

 

I'm lucky enough (so to speak:rolleyes:) to be exempt from script charges at the moment due to tax credits - if I wasn't I'd be looking at about £60 a month. However, when I was younger, not with decent money but also without any benefits, I went to my doctor and explained that I couldn't afford the monthly amount, but also couldn't afford the lump sum needed for pre-payment scripts.

 

Now I did know my doctor very well due to long term illness, so that may have helped, but he used to give me scripts to last 3 months. This meant that I was only paying 1 charge for 3 months of drugs.

 

I would try the same thing with your doctor and see where it gets you. Even if you can get a couple of months worth as your repeat rather than the standard one month it's better than nothing. You don't need to go into a detailed breakdown of your financial issues, just tell them at the moment you're struggling to get the script filled every month and would they be able to make it a larger amount. Or even say it's because you find it hard to get the time to pick them up every month and it would be easier if it was less. They're long term drugs so it's not a stretch to say either of those things.

 

Lexis:)

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again

 

I have no idea about incapacity benefit either, I think you may be mixing my post up with another?

 

As for your meds, it's not just a case of not being around for your boys, it's your wife too. You've stated you have no idea about benefits. You are bringing in the only wage at the moment - if you're not there what happens then? Sorry to be so blunt, but you can't go thinking that it won't matter, or worse that it would be better, if you aren't around.

 

We have housing association people on our estate, although we rent privately. It's only 5 years old, and they are nice people. You may find yourself in the same sort of place with the same sort of neighbours, don't go thinking that because it's HA it's automatically a dump. That's not necessarily the case. Plus, as far as I'm aware, if somewhere really isn't suitable for you, you don't have to take the first place they offer (can anyone who actually knows about this properly answer that one?)

 

As for benefits, I think someone posted a link to 'entitled to' earlier in your thread. It would be soooo worth you spending 10 minutes going through it to see if there is anything that can help you. You may not want to have to ask for monetary help at the moment, but if it gets you through a dark patch why not?? As you said, you've paid your taxes, let it help you if it can rather than the bloke sitting on his a**e.

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

A couple of things to remember for when you send your I/E sheet off to the creditors.

 

Don't sign any of it. Either print your name, sign on a patterned background, add letters into your signature, or my personal choice, use a digital signature - vLetter Free Font Demo Online - Try Our Real Cursive Handwriting Fonts is the place I use which is easy and quick.

 

You DO NOT need to let them have your signature for CCA requests, or send them any other documents they may ask for. They only need your I/E form as this is accepted as a true reflection of your finances. If you have any problems with this regarding them, I should have a letter you can use to send them off with a flea in their ear (it worked for me with Cap1 and Co-op)!

 

Remember what you put on your form is what you need to live. They know this. So, if/when they try and get you to up what you've offered, keep that in mind - they can afford to lose a tenner a month; you can't.

 

Lastly, if you haven't already got it in your covering letter I'd ask them to freeze interest and charges on receipt of your letter informing them of your change in circs. I didn't do this, and as a result ended up with between 1 and 3 months interest and charges being added whilst the account was being looked at. I'd just say something like as you've informed them of your difficulties, you would appreciate the interest and charges being frozen whilst they assess the situation, in order to stop the balance growing.

 

Lexis:)

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...