Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
    • Car maker takes a hit from weakening demand and price war in the world's largest electric vehicle market.View the full article
    • please stop posting up unnecessary unnamed screenshot files  you've done it throughout your threads and we have to renamed them. RENAME THE FILE before you upload if its just text information like a defence or a claim history or a link to a previous post  type it here not by an unnamed screenshot attachment  . sorry NM but you've been here dealing with PPC claims since 2021 somehow you always manage to screw up.......or do totally the opposite of std repeated advice on 10'000 of PPC threads here you are your own worst enemy... dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VT possible on Hire Agreement (Lease)?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5584 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I'm posting this again here because I think I put in in the wrong forum last time so apologies for that...

 

I know there are similar threads on here but I think I need help to identify exactly what kind of lease/hire agreement I've saddled meself with(!)

 

Anyway, I'm leasing/hiring a vehicle for my cleaning business but it's not really working out - it's costing too much and it's no longer suitable for the kind of work I'm doing.

 

Quick question; can I VT the leasing agreement or whatever it is, if not, what are my options?

 

The Hire Agreement is headed 'Hire Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974'

 

It mentions 'Period(s) of Hire, Rental Payments, but also Secondary Term(s) which I though were for leases - I'm confused!

 

Could post it if it would help...

 

Any advice gratefully accepted

 

H

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you will be tied in for the full term of the lease unless you can find someone to take it over from you. Usually leasehire is pretty iron clad as you never own the vehicle it is always theirs and you use it with their permission.

 

You can contact them and expalin that you cannot afford it, they may be willing to negotiale a severance fee for the agreement but I think that would be the best you can hope for.

 

I do not pretend to be an expert so wait and see what others can offer. Are you able to scan the terms and conditions and I could hyave a look at it for you if you can post a link to it on here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a Personal hire contract - if fact the only way it could be deemed 'business' if it was signed as a partnership or Limited company (or Plc). So, you get the benefit of the CCA, but my earlier comments hold good - explain that the vehicle doesn;t meet your needs and require another. If you are prepared to take a different vehicle with them financing it, you may be OK but expect to pay for the change of mind!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for your message.

 

Do you know what options I would have if I wanted to do a voluntary termination of the agreement? I know I can do this with HP if I've paid off 50% of the total balance, but would this be applicable in this case?

 

Thanks again

 

H

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are so many variations of Personal Leasing you'd really have to look at the 'Rights to Terminate' in the small print of the contract. The finance house can also advise, but as their interests aren;t the same as yours - see what they say and let us know what they suggest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like they will come after me like a pack of bloodhounds if this (from the Rental Agreement) is anything to go by (my comments in brackets):

 

"Additional amount payable if this Agreement or the hiring ends following your breach, see further under paragraph 12 of the Terms and Conditions.

 

You will have to pay:

 

(a) all Rentals and other sums which have fallen due but are unpaid as at the date of Termination or the ending of the Agreement under paragraph 11 of the Terms and Conditions; and

 

(b) damages for any loss we suffer as a result of any breach of your obligations; and

 

© by way of agreed liquidated damages and in addition to any arrears of Rentals, a sum equal to the Rentals which but for the Termination would have become payable during the remainder of the Term discounted at the rate of 5% per annum from the date the Agreement Terminated or ended to the dates on which the relevant Rentals would otherwise have fallen due; and

 

(d) any reasonable administration costs and expenses incurred by us as a result of your breach in accordance with paragraph 2.1.3 of the Terms and Conditions".

 

( + [d] = in other words an open cheque)

 

"Less the net sale proceeds of the Vehicle after deducting cost of repairs, storage, insurance and sale and any other costs including legal costs reasonably incurred if the vehicle is repossessed and sold within 3 months of termination, or if the vehicle is repossessed but not sold within such 3 month period, the value of the Vehicle as reasonably determined by us."

 

('reasonably determined by us' oh look another open cheque)

 

"Charges payable if you breach this Agreement:

 

• any repossession agents fees/tracing agents fees, vehicle storage charges/auction fees, insurance costs and abortive collection fees which we incur will be charged at the rates which are current at the time we incur them we will charge an administration fee of £70.50 (incl. VAT) each time we instruct a repossession agent or tracing agent

• any legal costs we incur will be charged (on a solicitor and own client basis) at the rates which are current at the time we incur them

• if you have failed to keep the Vehicle in good repair and condition, fair wear and tear excepted, and the Vehicle is for any reason returned to, or repossessed by us, we may require that you pay the costs of such repairs which are necessary to put the Vehicle in good repair and condition."

 

(They decide what's fair wear and tear - oh look yet another open cheque)

 

Looks like I'm stuffed unless there's some way to wriggle out of it! I don't really want to contact the finance company at this stage until I've explored all my options, or at least until I know what my rights are under this agreement...will have to apply for a copy of the t's and c's which I don't seem to have got.

 

Cheers for all your advice

 

H

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aha = but that is the requirements for a Breach of the agreement - you're not planning to do that, you're wanting to renegotiate the contract and try to get your existing vehicle swapped - so hopefully you can do this all amicably...!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well actually it would be more cost effective for me to give them this one back and buy another vehicle outright so if I could 'breach' the agreement say by voluntary termination that would be my preferred course of action.

 

However, I wouldn't want to do this if it were going to work out to be too expensive in the long term.

 

That's why I'm hoping what this may be is actually Hire Purchase, which would give me the option of VT once I had paid off 50% of the total cost (which I believe I may have by now).

 

At the moment I don't know how to differentiate between HP and personal leasing / personal hire contract...

 

Cheers

 

H

Link to post
Share on other sites

It goes without saying it would be more cost effective (in pure financial terms) to walk away from a binding agreement, however the pitfalls are many - forget abot the credit defaults, DCA harassment and the other joys of premature contract termination. If you're running a business, you need a default like a hole in the head as this will work against you for a minimum of six years. Can you put a price on that?

 

What is there to lose by seeiking an amicable (as far as the contract allows) amendment so get the vehicle you require? Of course, if the whole issue is money, and that the vehicle must go because the contract is now untenable, and you don;t plan to end it by negotiation, there is nothing within the CCA that really protects you from a justified creditor seeking enforcement of a debt. The best course of action is to short-stop the action if at all possible, becasue you end up paying big money to everyone else for the early termination, fees for the recovery, sale and residual value of the vehicle. It is a nightmare (BTDT) and to be avoided at all costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

(b) damages for any loss we suffer as a result of any breach of your obligations;

 

This is the majic clause, if you want to walk away you are going to have to pay the piper. They may negotiate on payment if you tell them you cant afford it but if you want to cancel they will most likely say OK but expect you to pay the remainder of the lease. The other clauses make sure that if you mess up or hold out in any way they can nail you to the wall.

 

My honest advice is to plead poverty and ask to return the vehicle as you cannot afford to keep it. they may negotiate on an out clause which orks out cheaper for you.

 

There is no easy way out of this contract, sorry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I see - well thanks very much for the advice - really appreciate it! (sniffle!!!)

 

BTW I just found out the buggers mis-sold me PPI (or GAP cover as they call it) so I've been paying for something that ain't worth the paper it's written on - don't suppose I can get them on that one?

 

Perhaps I should just be nice and ask them very politely if they would take their truck back?!!!!

 

H

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Just a thought, but it occurred to me that if I was mis-sold PPI (GAP insurance) and this was lumped in to the finance agreement there might be a chance that I could claim that there is a flaw in the contract and so it is non enforceable.

 

I will post this in the PPI forum as well just to see if anyone there knows if this is a possibility, but I would appreciate any views you may have.

 

Cheers

 

H

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to keep you all posted - I've been contacted by the leasing co who have confirmed that the insurance is not valid, and offered to repay the premium.

 

I pointed out that if they had not mis-sold the vehicle and the policy I would not have entered into a finance agreement with them and I now would like them to take back their vehicle and give me a generous settlement figure so that I can walk away from it.

 

Having taken some legal advice, it seems I'm on fairly solid ground so I'm going to write to them today outlining my case and wait for their response.

 

Will keep you abreast of developments

 

Cheers

 

H

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...