Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you fkofilee, Ill try and get an email put together , do i email all 3 of the above ?
    • Reform more or less said it's what they will be campaigning about but they don't expect to be implementing the plans. Dan Neidle thinks the cost is about double the amount of Truss's plans and the IFS think the figures are out by £10s of billions.
    • Rather like farage .. Reform UK plans ‘don’t add up’ and costings are out ‘by tens of billions of pounds per year’, says IFS – UK general election live | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM As Nigel Farage launches party’s manifesto, Institute for Fiscal Studies says ‘the package as a whole is problematic’   "Reform UK has published its manifesto. They plan tax cuts which they say will cost £70bn; however our analysis shows that they’ve miscalculated, and the actual cost will be at least £93bn. Reform UK says it will fund these tax costs with £70bn of savings and additional revenue, but it provides few details. Their proposal to change Bank of England reserve rules is over-stated by at least £15bn, and the cost would likely fall on businesses and consumers, not banks. These two factors mean that Reform UK’s plans have a total unfunded cost of at least £38bn – about twice the unfunded cost of Liz Truss’ ill-fated 2022 “mini-budget”.
    • The finance company has a 50% stake (legal Owner) in the deal so I would certainly involve them. As for the outstanding £3635 bill thats owing to Mercedes in Croydon I wouldn't be in a rush to settle that just yet and keep it in abeyance as leverage.  Where are you at with Doves in Horsham ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mail order catalogue ???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6476 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

Approximately 12 months ago my wife received a default on her credit file from the Littlewoods shop direct group. Admittedly she was behind with her payments and each missed payment incurred a £15.00 charge.

 

I was under the impression that organisations opperating under the consumer credit act had to comply with the law and send out a notice of default rpior to listing it, however noone seems willing to enforce the law in this particular instance. Although this has been brought to the attention of the information commissioners office, consumer direct, trading standards and the office of fair trading no one seems to be interested in helping to rectify the situation.

 

The default was for £280.00 and as soon as I became aware of this (when declined a personal loan due to the default) I settled the account in full. In hindsight I beleive that I should have negotiated with the company first, only making payment if the default was to be removed.

 

Although the late / missed payment charge of £15.00 is a lot lower than some of the banks / credit card companies charges of £30.00 etc I was wondering whether it could be claimed back in the same way as bank charges and credit card charges, hence giving me another bargaining tool to get the default removed.

 

Alternatively any other advise regarding this matter would be most appreciated.

 

Regards Ben

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome.

 

All penalty charges of this nature are unlawful and can (and should) be claimed back.

 

If you look around the site you will find details of how to get a default removed.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legalities/11659-how-get-your-default.html

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alternatively any other advise regarding this matter would be most appreciated.

 

You could also ask them to provide a copy of the credit agreement relating to the default. If they cannot produce one they cannot prove any default as there will be no terms.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Hagen190 & dw190

 

Thanks for your response, I started the default removal procedure back in May by sending off letter 1, two months later and no response despite posting via special delivery and enclosing postal order. I also have proof of delivery and the name of the person who signed for it. (interestingly the company had three other special delivery letters on the same day according to the proof of delivery -perhaps others are having to take the same action as I am).

 

Time to send letter number two.

 

I have already been on to trading standards regarding this, unfortunately they were not interested in the least, quoting that this was a civil matter, and they only dealt with criminal matters. Obviously the lack of response to my letters will turn this into a criminal matter, so the ball will be back firmly in their court.....

 

Once again thanks for the advice.

 

Regards

 

Ben

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Unfortunately By paying the default immediately I was aware of it, I lost my bargaining tool (ie the payment) for getting the default removed. Not having previously had any defaults I naturally thought that the best remedy was to pay this without delay, I now know otherwise.

 

With this in mind and considering the charges made by the organisation running up to the default, is it worth negotiating the removal of the default in return for dropping the claim against charges - ideally I suppose it would be better to nail them for both the charges and the default removal.

 

Again any ideas or experience regarding this would be most appreciated.

 

Regards

 

Ben

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

djzian - I had problems with the same company. They applied a default over £68 - I didn't query it at the time - I was late paying, fair enough. Anyways... when I started my claim against them to get the charges paid back - I found there was almost £1000 of items on the statements that I'd never even ordered. I'm still in the middle of sorting that out... filed at court a coupla weeks back... if they charged your wife.. you NEED to claim the money back. When you do so, make sure the removal of the default is one of the things they have to do to satisfy you or you'll take them to court. If it goes that far... make sure that's added to the particualrs of claim. They're being gits with me, so be prepaired for a fight - but good luck!

NatWest Visa - recieved a letter from court wanting more info re what sections of several law things im using to claim back the money - got to reply by 13th! still no idea!!!!!

 

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Ace - £1300 - SETTLED IN FULL

Capital One - £200 - SETTLED IN FULL

JD Williams - £400 - SETTLED IN FULL

Littlwoods - £2700- SETTLED IN FULL

NATWEST - £2703.33 - SETTLED IN FULL

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...