Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • We purchased our Mercedes in September 2023 from Doves in Horsham for £21000, paying half cash and half on finance. We also purchased warranty for life via Ramp as recommended by Doves. On 12th May 2024 the car failed to recognise the key and wouldn’t not open, the AA could not identify the problem so via our warranty the car was taken to Mercedes in Croydon. After 3 weeks the problem was finally identified as water ingress in the drivers side footwell which has corroded and blown various components. After further investigation it was discovered the windscreen was date stamped 2019 (all the windows are 2018 - therefore not the factory fitted windscreen) The leak has developed due to incorrect sealant being used assuming when this was replaced and also water leaking from the seam. The warranty company do not cover water ingress so we are now faced with a bill of £3635. As we are now at 8 months since purchase (problem started at just over 7 months) we are not covered by the consumer rights acts. Would we be covered Sale of Goods Act? We have all the reports for the works being completed but unsure if this should be taken to the finance company or Doves who we purchased the car from. Do we pay for the works and then try and claim it back or should they be paying? Any help would be much appreciated
    • im also wondering if back billing applies here too . from looking at like threads around this SSE to ovo compulsory switch, it must be evidenced by the claimant that bills were regularly issued for the period of the supply the debt they claim covers. there are no threads here that show they could ever produce them, so back billing rules (12mts) might also play a part.
    • Vodafone have reported that they are having issues with their Credit File APIs into the Credit Reference Agencies where aged accounts over 6 years are being readded to Credit Files. In some instances, people are having defaults rescinded and changed to late payment status making the account live again!    --- Have you been affected? Please keep an eye out on your credit file for any  new Vodafone Account appearing where there shouldnt be any reason. If you are a Vodafone Customer - Check that the information is correct. check for Late Payments and Defaults.    Don't forget to consider the financial impacts this could have on you.  ---   If you are struggling - Post below and we can guide you to get the result you need!    Its been reported that Experian and TransUnion seem to be where these appear.  They are able to remove the information relatively quickly and it will reflect on next Credit File Refresh.         
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

My mum and problems with letting agent


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5690 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

My mother who is 80 yo is moving into a sheltered bungalow having lived in a privately rented house for the past 10 years.

 

I am helping with the move and changing services, notices to quit etc. and we have just had a letter following our notice to quit and it states that it is a requirement that my mother provides copies of final account statements of all utility bills to ensure the release of her deposit. As most of the utilities are being transferred to the bungalow i'm not sure how this is gonna be possible.

 

Am I right in thinking that they can't request or require that this be done? I'm sure I have read somewhere that the utitliy bills are nobody else's business other than between the utility company and the account holder?

 

My mother is ony on a pension and she could really do with the deposit to help pay for removal fees etc and i'm concerned that the LA are gonna play hardball with her so any help/advice offered would be most grateful :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no reason for the agent to see the final bills. Charges for gas etc are payable by the person who has the contract with the relevant company and not by the landlord. Since the landlord cannot be responsible for the bills there is no justification for the agent to withhold the deposit on that account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

My mother has recently moved to a new sheltered bungalow (she is 80) from a privately let house she occupied for 10 years.

 

The letting agent has telephoned her since with a list of defects that they want attending too which i'm happy to consider prior to the return of deposit but they are putting pressure on my mother in that they have told her that these things need attending to urgently priior to the new tenants moving in and if they are not then they will call in professionals and bill us. As my mother can't possibly do anything and I have my own business to run they don't seem to be giving us much time to discuss things.

 

Whilst I appreciate that we have to enter a dialogue with these people i don't see why we should be bullied or rushed into doing anything just so they can re-let the place. There are things on their list that I don't agree with and imo are fair wear and tear bearing in mind that the tenancy was 10 yo and the place was never decorated by the LL in that time.

 

My questions are:

 

Do they have to supply me with a list of defects in writing?

Is there a period of time given to negotiate and perhapscome to agreement about these alleged defects?

 

Thanks very much in advance :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there. If I was you I would phone or write to the Agents and ask them to deal with you in the future as your Mother is elderly etc.

Firstly, May I say with respect, the Letting agents are quite within their rights to request that any dilapidations are dealt with, within a time limit as it is obviously in their best interests to get the house relet. All the time the property is empty, the owners are losing money.

That said, they do need to give you a list of these dilapadations, then you can inform them of the things that you feel are wear and tear. Certainly ,after 10 years with no redecoration there is bound to be wear and tear.

You are also lucky that you are being given time to sort out these problems yourself as most LL and LA like the property to be sorted out before the tenant leaves.

I would say your next move is to contact the LA and ask them how long they are giving you to sort these things out.

Best of Luck x

  • Haha 1

Please note, my advice is only my opinion.

If you have found my advice helpful, please tip my scales, thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply help_me :) I have done as you suggested already and delivered a letter asking them to deal with me direct and also for a delapidation list.

 

As you say there is a fair amount of wear and tear within the property as it has never been decorated by the LL during the tenancy and anything that has been done has been carried out by myself. I have asked to meet a representative on site to discuss the problems. As my business deals with property development and maintence I am hoping I can do most things required myself given enough time. I will let you know how the meeting went.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do not "rush so they can relet the place" - they will be losing rent. You will then become liable for this rent. Therefore, it is in your best interests to do so.

 

They have no obligation to even allow you to rectify the issues - they can just go ahead and deduct from the deposit/bill accordingly. As they are giving you the opportunity to resolve, I would suggest that if they are giving you anything more than 7 days, they are being very generous.

  • Haha 1

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your input MrShed. I am due to meet the property manager on thursday to see what needs doing.

 

Whilst I'm aware that they need to re-let the property I merely wanted the opportunity to see what needs doing and whether I could do at least some of it..and I am aware they can just go ahead and deduct what they need to with the deposit...but whether it's reasonable or not is a different matter..my experience so far with these letting agents hasn't been particularly good and all I want from them is to be fair.

 

Also wasn't aware that we would still be laible for rent, My mother had a periodic tenancy and my understanding was that she is/was only liable for the rent up to the date of quitting the tenancy having given the appropriate notice... perhaps I am wrong and someone here can clear that point up for me?

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

She is not still liable for rent. However, her damages mean that she is liable for actual financial loss. If these are not resolved, and as a result rental income is lost, then she is responsible for this loss.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...