Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

morgan stanley or barclaycard ***DELIGHTED**


brindles
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5311 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 217
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Will send to churchill place, is there a name i should add?

 

No, it will find it's way to BLT = Barclays Litigation Team

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all,

Lets not forget i have sent the following letter 17/11/08.

 

I am in receipt of the documents that you have supplied in response to my Data Protection Act information request dated 15/10/2008. received by you on 21st October 2008.The disclosure of personal data is incomplete in that at least the following documents are missing.

 

 

1) You have failed to provide a complete list of transactions and charges for July to September 2006.

 

 

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

You have a further 15 days days to comply.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

This morning a have received 2 of the 3 missing statements. Aug and sept 06

but july 06 is still missing.

 

I know there is £40 of charges applied to the missing statement but i do not know on what date in july these became added.

 

should i send another letter

or just wait

or just forget about it and leave it off my claim.

 

I feel i should claim all they have taken, even if it is just one statement missing.

but i am also eager to file my claim.

 

thanks again for your advice. I realy cant praise you guys enough for your help.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ps I can confirm that goldfish are no longer replying to my letters as the last letter came from barclaycard themselves.

 

This concurs with your advice, sorry to all that i felt in two minds about this issue.

 

I now know that all claims against morgan stanley/dean whitter and/or goldfish are to be made against barclaycard at there churchill place address.

 

I post this reply for anyone in the same situation as me(learning but confused) in the hope it helps.

 

thanks to you all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi all,

I have been waiting for 1 missing statement to arrive and the time limit (40 days) has now passed.

 

Do i simply go ahead with my claim and not worry about it, or

 

as they have not fully complied with my request, it is now a different matter, or both?

 

thanks to all and as soon as i know i can send of my preliminary claim.

 

thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brindles,

 

You can send the non-compliance letter below about the missing data.

 

They may respond when you write, or you may have to issue separate proceedings for this. Read the 2nd link about that.

 

Data Protection Act - Non-Compliance - Template Letters

 

Data Protection Act Non-Compliance - Particulars of claim

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi slick

 

sent template 2 today and i understand to make a claim for non comlpiance. I am missing one statement.

In the meantime should i after the 7 days also make a claim for the charges in a seperate claim and in this seperate claim, should i claim i am making a seperate claim for a missing statement.

In other words, should i mention in my charges claim there is a statement missing and be able to alter my claim on the day, the judge being in knowledge of the process.

 

phew almost there.

 

thank you slick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is only one missing statement I would just estimate it from the ones either side. I did that with our GE Money claim where there were rather more than one missing statement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks

 

2 claims it is. one for non-compliance and one for charges.

 

I will get all the details together and let you know.

 

I am gratefull to every one for the advice and for getting me this far.

 

thank you all.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi all.

sorry been away so long I have been ill. not to worry though as i have worked it out and I will send in my preliminary letter in the morning 11/12/2008.

 

charges=£760.00 interest=£1,609.97 total claim=£2,369.97

 

I will be sending to the churchill place address.

 

thanks everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again

In my letter for repayment I have given them 14 days to refund the charges.

I did not state in this letter the words "letter before action". Will I have to wait the 14 days and then send a letter before action or can i skip sending a letter before action as my last letter stated if they do not comply fully with my request within 14 days i will begin a claim for the full amount plus interest.

 

any advice please, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 1st ltr is your Prelim Letter.

 

After 14 days, you send another ltr which is the LBA and the letter should state this. It should threaten court action but, if it didn't, you shouldn't worry.

 

After another 14 days, files your chgs claim at court on form N1.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I sent prelim letter on thee 11/12 so letter before action will be due to go out 25/12.

All seems to take a lot of time. Well I wil write letter now as I think something is happening on the 25/12 lol.

 

I would just like to thank you all and wish you all a merry xmas and a happy new year.

 

thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And a VM Christmas to you too, Brindles.

 

:D

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi all

hope you all had a nice christmas and having a happy new year.

 

I sent my preliminary letter before action and the 14 days was up on the 25/12/08 but on the 23/12 i had a letter from barclaycard saying although they do not agree with my legal ananalys they are going to credit the difference between the £20 charge and the £12 charge to my account plus 8% interest.

 

I have now received my statement and they have credit £324 to my account.

 

Could you please advise how this changes things,please.

 

many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Refuse it - if it is not too late.

 

If they have already refunded then tell them that you will only accept this payment as part settlement and press on with your action.

 

This is a common ploy by Banks.

 

I have had similar and I have still gone on to reclaim the difference (less the refund)

 

Good Luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brindles.

 

If the £324 is not a full refund of all your charges, send the appropriate letter from here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejecting-offers.html

 

Also, if I've read it right, you've only sent the Prelim Letter so far, so it is now time to send your LBA. Print out your LBA and send the 2 letters to BC together.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

Thanks for the template, I eill be using template 4.

 

Although i wrote to barclaycard, churchill place e14.

The offer they sent has come from northampton.

 

Should i respond to the address supplied or continue to write to churchill place,ignoring the address supplied.

 

sorry again and thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brindles,

 

Reply to the Northants address.

 

The only time it is VITAL to use the London HO addy is when you are filing a court claim against BC, using their proper name which is:-

 

Barclays Bank PLC trading as Barclaycard

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi I have had a reply.

 

They have creditded my account with a further £505.00 refund of late payment charges at the same time they have reduced my credit limit by £500.00, they have also enclosed my original C.C.A with morgan stanley.

 

The original C.C.A is worthless to them and indeed is only an application form. No mention of payments,intetrest,and it says,in the box where i signed, "please sign and return in the freepost envelope provided-your application must be received by us before the 1st september 2001.

 

stapled to the application is another sheet of paper with financial and related conditions(there words).

 

My questions are

can they just reduce my credit limit,After all it is a refund of MY MONEY therefore I am entitled to spend my money on what i choose,but maybe not

 

Is time for talking over and should I now apply to court.

 

Thanks again to you all, almost there lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they can reduce your credit limit.

 

Does the £505 include contactual interest?

 

I thought not.

 

They WILL credit your account with this, just as they did with mine @26.8% compound, but will have issue a small claim, at which point you can also ask the Court for judicial interest - at the same rate as the account - 26.8% compound.

 

LBA them now. Need help with wording this- just ask.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...