Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tilly Is Going Bankrupt (here we go again )


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5392 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

See if you can delay the bankruptcy until 6th April. Once you are made bankrupt your tax rate for the remainder of the financial year is nil.

No point in going bankrupt in March and only getting a few days tax relief!

 

Hmm, yeah, your tax code is set to NIL, but that's because the OR will want you to hand over your normal tax element of earnings as an IPA (or part of a larger IPA if disposable income)! Better to go BR in March methinks...

 

Cheers

Michael

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 276
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes you do have to take into consideration how much you are going to be earning. If the amount untaxed is lower than the limit allowed by the OR for reasonable living expenses then you will still be OK and have the benefit of having the extra income that would otherwise go in tax.

 

If the untaxed amount is above the OR's limit then you may want to pay the tax. You're going to have to pay something, either to the OR or HMRC.

From my point of view anything paid to the OR goes to the creditors so I would plump for the HMRC. :)

 

I don't think that's quite right... from Income Payments Agreements and Income Payments Orders

"Applying a 'Nil tax' code

 

If you pay tax under PAYE, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will usually apply a 'nil tax' code to you for the rest of the tax year in which you were declared bankrupt. This means that soon after your bankruptcy, your employer will be told NOT to take any more income tax from your wages for the rest of the tax year. HMRC applies nil tax codes for various reasons, and the new tax code will not tell your employer you are bankrupt. The nil tax code does not mean no tax is due. It just enables HMRC to claim the whole of your unpaid tax for the year of your bankruptcy.

 

There will be extra money in your pay because of the nil tax code. This money will form the basis of an IPA or IPO, even if you have no other real disposable income. A nil tax (or NT) IPA or IPO may be the only amount you have to pay, and the agreement or order will stop when your tax code changes. If you have other real disposable income, the IPA or IPO will reduce when your tax code changes" (my bolding)

 

Here's a trivial example -

Assume you are getting £1000 per month and assume for the sake of illustration that the OR's limit for reasonable living expenses is £800.

If you paid no tax then the OR would want £200 per month.

 

No, the OR would want ~50% of the £200 - see Technical: IEL Reference Guide: WAGES OWED

 

Cheers

Michael

Edited by mcuth

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou

 

That has made it a lot clearer, no other disposable income, will just be my wages, and luckily no other debts, so all what they take will go towards paying the shortfall of the mortgage, one more question, what happens after the year is up, do they carry on taking money from wages or is it stopped after that year and im free so to speak :)

 

Np :)

As far as I can gather, if the IPA is only made up of the tax element, then at the end of that tax year (i.e. when your tax code changes back) the OR will probably suspend your IPA - the OR may even take the view that an IPA is no longer appropriate (see "What happens if I miss a payment under my IPA or IPO?" at Income Payments Agreements and Income Payments Orders)

 

Cheers

Michael

  • Haha 1

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

This depends on whether an IPA is made or not. I'm assuming it isn't because the available funds aren't sufficient. You are assuming they are.

We're talking about different circumstances ... :)

 

Not at all - the guidance I linked to says that if you pay tax, the amount of tax you would've paid (but won't because of the NIL tax code) will be payable as an IPA whether or not there is any other income that could be assessed for an IPA.

 

Basically, if you pay tax currently, there will be an IPA (for the tax year you're bankrupt in, so a max of 12 months) of at least what your tax would be - see the last bolded para in my quote from the guidance.

 

ISTBC, of course :)

 

Cheers

Michael

Edited by mcuth

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

i take if i go bankrupt the shortfall gets passed to ex :rolleyes:

 

Presume so, if you were jointly liable for it and the ex isn't going bankrupt of course...

 

Cheers

Michael

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Does anyone know how i disassociate myself from the ex on your credit report, i really need to do this asap !!!

 

How about this?:

Notice of Disassociation - Consumer Wiki

 

or this:

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 05 Credit Reference Agencies

 

I think the CRAs have sections on their websites about them too.... :)

 

HTH

 

Cheers

Michael

  • Haha 1

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...