Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6342 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone !

I`m new to this but have spent a fair few hrs in the FAQ and reading various case notes.

I`ve banked with the YB for about 15yrs but in the last 5 or 6 i`ve really been stung for charges.

I`ve got the ball rolling by sending £10 of postal orders along with a Subject Access Request letter by recorded post on the 14-7-06. I`m told they should receive it by monday 17th at the latest. Thats when i`ll start counting the 40 days, which at this stage feels like an eternity.

Ps This is an excellent site and thanks for all the info. I`ll keep you posted on my story

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Koberoy and welcome to the site. You've made a good start by reading the FAQs and other posts :D [you won't get your wrists slapped by a Mod now ;)]. 40 days does seem like quite a long time, but it'll give you chance to read a lot more posts and learn what to expect in the long run.

 

Any questions just give a shout - we're all in the same boat, and we're all here to help.

 

PJ

Advice & opinions given by pjdudley69 are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. Also visit legal seagulls for more friendly help and advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone !

I`m new to this but have spent a fair few hrs in the FAQ and reading various case notes.

I`ve banked with the YB for about 15yrs but in the last 5 or 6 i`ve really been stung for charges.

I`ve got the ball rolling by sending £10 of postal orders along with a Subject Access Request letter by recorded post on the 14-7-06. I`m told they should receive it by monday 17th at the latest. Thats when i`ll start counting the 40 days, which at this stage feels like an eternity.

Ps This is an excellent site and thanks for all the info. I`ll keep you posted on my story

 

My statements arrived after 18 days, so that's encouraging for you. They seem to be getting their act together regarding complying with the DPA stuff, but the later stages are all still a bit of a hard slog it seems. I reckon it looks like they don't really know what to do, so they're delaying as much as possible in order to see if anyone falls by the wayside.

We'll all be calling their bluff then. :D

19/6/06 Data Protection Act letter sent recorded delivery.

27/6/06 Confirmation of receipt from Clydesdale Bank. Awaiting statements.

7/7/06 Statements arrived in the post - all 3 accounts as requested. (This took 18 days in total).

10/07/06 3 accounts - £898.00 excluding interest of £216.61 - Prelim letter posted by recorded delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Koberoy and welcome to the forum. You appear to have made a good start and have a good idea about how to go about reclaiming your charges. If you need any help then feel free to post questions in this thread and we will do our best to answer them.

Steve

BEFORE starting your claim read through the FAQ's and if there's something you aren't sure of then ask.

If you win, donate to this site

Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions, some formed by personal experience and some from research. If in doubt seek qualified legal advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Statements recieved this morning, hanging out of a shabby envelope. Not very impressed with how they handle confidential imformation but atleast they complied. Will get the highlighter out later and start totting up

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there folks !

Just another question for you all. Which spreadsheet do you advise me to use when calculating the charges i`ve recieved and interest ? I`ve looked in the templates library and don`t know if i should use the simple or advanced spreadsheets. Does it really matter which :confused:

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Prelim letter draughted with schedule of charges and will post recorded delivery today , requesting repayment of charges totalling £ 1160. This figure doesn`t include interest. YB ! i`m coming to get you :cool:

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

:confused: Hi everyone ! i`ve been in the FAQs again. I just dont understand the interest thats generated from solely my charges. My point is, if you`ve got an over draught then that generates interest every month. So if you`ve been charged then that would be responsible for part of that interest, but not all.How do i work out the sum of that interest. The spreadsheet i used only calculated the 8% which you apply when going to court.

Would much appreciate if someone could enlighten my understanding

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Recieved standard fob off letter yesterday. L.B.A time now !

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all ! The 1st schedule of charges i sent with my prelim letter only contained charges and no interest. This was because i used the simple spreadsheet. After recieved thier initial fob of letter i decided to try the more advance spreadsheet. My charges totalled 1160, the advanced spreadsheet came up with the figure of 613.87 in interest on penalties. Is this a realistic figure:confused: . I don`t want to send my LBA off with a schedule of charges that i`ve made a mess of !

Any help more than welcome

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you using the right spreadsheet? Use the advanced one and that has a sheet called "Charges and Interest". Fill in the amount of your charges, and then there are more columns for calculating the interest. If you get stuck there is a thread which in the general forum to help you. I think you are quite right to include this as you would not have incurred so much interest without the charges.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi All! I`m slightly behind schedule, due to a much needed family break.

Anyway a quick update. After sending my LBA i recieved a letter saying they would relook into my case, and would get back to me within 4 weeks. MCOL filed tonight so lets see what happens now:D

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do i need to send a breakdown of charges to the courts, or is it something i`d just produce on the day

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can send them 2 copies when you file the Allocation Questionnaire that the court will send to you for completion.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Caro:)

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Looked on MCOL tonight. Still nothing. They were deemed as issued on the 24th and have until the 8th to respond. Tick tock !

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone :)

I got a letter from their legal services today

`Dear Mr Koberoy

I refer you to the above claim that you have raised with the bank. The bank has filed an Acknowledgement of Service.

You have failed to provide details of the account you claim to hold with the Bank(sort code and account number) nor have you provided sufficient details of the charges you should be refunded(date and amount levied)

You are required to provide these necessary details to us by no later than 13th Oct 2006

Should you fail to provide such details we will apply to have your claim struck out pursuant to CPR part3.4(2)© and than you be ordered to pay our costs of the proceedings subject to detailed assessment on basis that you have failed to provide full particulars of claim as required by the Civil Procedures Rules.

You should take independant legal advice or contact your local Citizens Advice Bureau if you are unclear on any of the terms of this letter.`

It came as a bit of a reality check this did. Firstly i`ve posted recorded delivery a full schedule of charges including all interest along with a short covering letter. Their letter was dated the 10th and i receieved it today. They should have the info they requested tomorrow. What i don`t understand is that they have all this information anyway. Or are they purely referring the the particulars of claim, which i couldn`t include my schedule of charges on MCOL.

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry, they are just trying to frighten you. If you have sent it already then that is dealt with. I assume your particulars of claim were the standard ones as suggested on this site, quoting the legislation which applies to your claim. If you have dealt with it already you can safely ignore it, as it seems they have crossed in the post.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

AQ completed and handed in today at the county court and paid the £100 fee. This is begining to feel like a bit of a marathon

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D I`ll post this in the relevant thread as well. Just like to say i wish YB were as cooperative as MBNA. I sent the prelim letter 2 weeks ago. Gave them a call today prior to the despatch of my LBA. Spoke to a lovely lass who informed me they`ll pay my charges + compound interest at 22.9%. Cheque should be with me in 7 to 10 days. RESULT:D

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen that they do that. I really wish I'd had an MBNA card instead of banking with this lot.LOL

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all ! I recieved a Part 36 Offer- Without Prejudice save as to costs. The jokers have offered me £1070, when me claim total £2273.

It goes on to say that no offer is made in respect of interest as that is at the descretion of the court, and in their view the court would not exercise its discretion to award interest in my favor given that the charges were levied as a result of my own actions and failures.

...... and there`s more `This letter is written in an attempt to resolve this case without the need to incur further court time. It is therefore without prejudice to the banks whole rights and pleas and may not be referred to without the Banks written consent. Please note however, that should this offer not be accepted by you, the Bank will refer the Court to this letter when deciding the costs to be awarded in the case.

Are this lot really really trying to tickle me pink. :cool: I`m sure i`ve read a thread where someone got a similar letter. Should i actually reply to this bunch or just sit tight for my day in court.

Ps They also sent me a copy of Their AQ which states they`ve requested a month stat to try and settle. Any ideas anyone. Advice and comments will be much appreciated on this one

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write and reject the offer. You might suggest that you are willing to just pay the amount of their actual costs as a result of the breaches, which will require them to show their calculations for this. You would amend your claim accordingly. I would also write to the court and object to the stay as they have had 3 months to try and settle, and have just come up with a derisory offer. If you haven't already done so also ask the court to consider a request for standard disclosure. They are in no position to second guess the courts views on statutory interest, so don't let them bully you.

 

They are not coming up with anything they haven't done lots of times before, except that the offer is lower than usual.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Court date set for 22nd feb 2007

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

:D Hi All !

The latest is i recieved an offer on the 13th for 1231 + 220 court costs. My charges totalled 1160 so thier calculation of interest is conservative at the very least. It also goes on to state that`any liability for tax on the interest awarded is included within the sum offered, and you are obliged to account to HMRC direct for any tax due.`

I`m sending my rejection letter off on friday. Court bundles need to be in by the 8th Feb, but mine will be in before because i`ll be in Egypt at that time. It doesn`t really leave much time before court.

YB Data Protection Act letter sent recorded post 14-7-06

statements recieved 8-08-06

prelim letter sent 9-08-06

LBA letter sent 26-08-06

MCOL filed 18-09-06

AQ Filed 6-11-06

Court date 22-2-07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...