Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
    • I am heading over to hers tomorrow so I will find out.  Will there be something written in the agreement or does it depend on the agreement its self ? Just so I know what to look for, so I can provide as much information as possible on here. 
    • The answer to this is going to depend on what the agreement your friend signed says. Or contact the housing provider and ask them.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mucka v Abbey


Mucka
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6500 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

I have been reading around this site for ages now - and have used/followed all advice regarding claiming back charges.

I am now at the stage of completing the money claim online form and I'm stuck so here I am asking for help.

I am at the 'particulars of claim' page...I found the text below in your FAQ's.

 

You have a contract with the defendant bank dated XXXX and which is conducted on their standard terms and conditions. You are claiming the return of money taken by the defendant in the way of charges over the last xx years plus the interest they have levied on those charges. The bank's charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. Further, as a disproportionate penalty they are invalid under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2(1)(e). In the event that the charges are not a penalty then they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15.

You have repeatedly asked the bank to justify their charges but they have declined to do so.

 

Please can someone reassure me that this is what I put into the box provided?

 

Where do I fill in the amount I'm claiming for? Does that come on the next page?

Thanks for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mucka

 

Sorry for not getting onto this earlier. (I just won my case this afternoon - see my thread Abbey Fob Off????)

 

But anyway, this is what i put in my claim:

 

Claim for refund of punitive charges on account xxxxxxxxx. Claiming return of money taken by the defendant in way of charges over the last 15 months plus the interest they have levied on those charges. The bank's charges are a disproportionate penalty,therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. A disproportionate penalty they are invalid under the Unfair

(Contracts) Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2(1)(e). In the event that the charges are not a penalty then they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15. I've repeatedly asked the bank to justify their charges but they have declined to do so.There are 20

different charges between the dates of 20/06/2005 and 24/02/2006 with a total cost of £570.00+ interest pursuant to S69 CCA at such rate, for such periods as court deems just. Scheduleof all charges is available and has already been sent to the defendant.

Hope this helps?

Rayo1973

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would anyone like to help with the next bit?

 

Interest - I know everyone asks this, I've read about it in so many threads, but still don't get it!

 

I'm claiming for £4915, so with interest calculated at 8% = £852.68.

 

So the bit I don't understand is this bit:

 

"and also interest at same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of (£0.00p This is the amount you're claiming multiplied by 0.0022)."

:|

What do I put here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all - your help is appreciated. I've got the form all done now, but may have to wait a few days to find the £250 for submission.

 

Will keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update:

 

Begged my Mother's credit card for the court fee - have given her a cast-iron guarantee that she will get the money back when Abbey settle. (gulp).

 

So anyway, claim submitted. Claim No. 6QZ46595. Gonna have a glass of wine now to celebrate having got this far. Wish me luck :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I filed my claim last Friday and it was issued today.

 

However I received a letter today in response to my LBA and a couple of paragraphs gave me cause for concern. It may well be a standard letter - you tell me.

Here are the paragraphs:

 

"The Financial Services Authority (FSA) governs Abbey, and they overtook our Terms and Condititons to ensure they are legal and fair. As such, charges incurred under these terms and conditions are not unlawful, they are valid. When you opened yor acount with Abbey you were provided with this documentation and accepted them, and the penalties if you breached the terms;.

 

Then...

"Charges are one way of deterring customers from making regular payments when there are insuficient funds to cover them. "

 

This suggests to me a punititive aspect to charges.

 

However, like I say. maybe you've all had this letter - but I felt I should express my concerns.

 

A couple of other questions while I am here -

 

My claim was issued today - do I need to send hard copies of spreadsheet detailing charges to the Court/Abbey??

 

Please help - at the end of my tether. This is taking over my every waking moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...