Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

LTSB Court claim - help please


remus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4914 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi foolishgirl, would it be at all possible for you to set my defence out, with the default notice?.

 

The ccj has been set aside, and now I need to put in my defence.

 

Any help greatly appreciated.

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 187
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi,

do I need to include copies of the complete Woodchester case and Kpohraror v Woolwich for the court and SCM?.

 

I have copied most of the paper work of the original claim for the court, as it is still 'lost'.

How should I word the covering letter without causing offence?

 

Just run out of paper, so will get some tomorrow, I have till Tuesday!

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just giving you a gentle nudge :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

do I need to include copies of the complete Woodchester case and Kpohraror v Woolwich for the court and SCM?.

 

 

If you cite a case in your defence then you must have a full copy for the Court, SCM and yourself.

 

May I also suggest that you contact the court and see if SCM have filed any documents............as they have a habit of not serving them on the defendant when they are obliged to.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you citizenB and supasnooper,

 

The order is for me to file a defence, I don't think SCM are doing anything yet.

 

This is my concern with the defence, I understand and will be using the loverly 42man's statement of evidence, but,

 

1. do I need to put SCM to strict proof of the post date for the default notice, or will that just prolong the procedure?

 

2. what orders do I need to put forward?

 

3. Should I include an order for costs with an amount?

 

Just concerned I will miss something simple.

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

answered my own questions.

Edited by remus

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just rereading your thread as requested remus.

 

Can you clarify please:

 

1. what was this hearing for - set aside, SO, CO???

 

2. why is the DJ now asking for a defence - I thought you had submitted this ages ago & been told that what you had submitted would stand for both cases?

 

3. what date do you have to have defence in by?

 

4. other comments below:

 

SCM had a representative at the hearing today, he mentioned it getting struck out, and gave me a copy of 'Securum Finance Ltd v Ashton and another', which he would of used "a second bite of the cherry".

 

Not relevant to your case & should be stressed in defence

 

The Judge asked what my defence was originally, (as my file is still 'lost'),

 

This is DISGUSTING!!! How can the DJ hold an impartial hearing when he is missing the docs you submitted. Grounds for appeal in itself!!

That said, did you not have a copy of your defence etc. with you?

 

Can you upload it to CAG or point me to the post please?

 

and I said the Default. Mr rep kindly furnished the judge with a copy.

I did ask him if it was my copy of the default, as they said they couldn't get hold of one!

 

The Judge read the dates, looked in his cpr book, and said it clearly states 14 days, and the default has been incorrectly delivered, as there is only 7.

 

I now have to base my defence on the default notice, and have about 2 weeks to do so.

 

The Judge also vacated the CO hearing, and something else (sorry, I just went blank, as I knew I was in above my head with the questions he was asking me). When I get it through, I will post exactly what he has ordered.

 

Can you post that order please?

 

 

 

I have an enforcement notice, giving intention to terminate the Agreement on said date, with a demand for £x plus interest which is accruing daily.

Default notice is dated 8 days after the intended termination, and the amount has increased by a monthly payment, and plus interest which is accruing daily.

 

Which comes first? the default or the termination??

 

Can you post these please?

 

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Default notice should be issued first, then the termination notice or final demand.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
"http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x46/remus_09/scan0002.jpg"

 

Agreement.

 

 

"http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x46/remus_09/scan0011.jpg"

 

Default

 

Here's the default notice.

 

 

Just going to upload 2 orders.

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Order 1 July

 

1 Judgement is set aside

 

2 The Defendant do file and serve a Defence by July (done)

 

3 The ICO is discharged and the hearing vacated

 

4 No order for costs

 

 

 

 

Order 2 August

 

It is ordered that

 

The court on its own motion and having ordered the parties to file Allocation Questionnaires by a separate order made today (not received yet)

 

It is further ordered that:

 

1 Simultaneously with filing the AQ the parties shall each certify to the court and to each other the total amount (less costs) that they currently consider the claim to be worth, subject to liability.

 

2 Each party shall file with the AQ file proposed directions on the form attached hereto (no form attached)

 

3 The parties shall comply with CPR PD 43 paragraph 6.4 and 6.5

 

4 Each party shall file with the AQ a completed reply to the invitation to mediate

 

I really would appreciate help with the 2nd order.

Edited by remus

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remus, can you post the defence that you submitted please? (Sorry I wasn't around to help with it)

 

IMO the above DN is pants & can be worked to your advantage.

 

Answers to your queries on AQ below:

 

 

Order 2 August

 

It is ordered that

 

The court on its own motion and having ordered the parties to file Allocation Questionnaires by a separate order made today (not received yet)

 

It is further ordered that:

 

1 Simultaneously with filing the AQ the parties shall each certify to the court and to each other the total amount (less costs) that they currently consider the claim to be worth, subject to liability.

 

2 Each party shall file with the AQ file proposed directions on the form attached hereto (no form attached)

 

It doesn't need a form, it just get submitted on attached piece of paper.

 

3 The parties shall comply with CPR PD 43 paragraph 6.4 and 6.5

 

CPR PD 43 here: http://www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/practice_directions/pd_parts43-48.htm

4 Each party shall file with the AQ a completed reply to the invitation to mediate

 

Your response here depends on whether you wish to mediate. Personally I don't see much point - they have unlawfully terminated before they issued DN, they are not entitled to claim full balance. Simples! However a 'without prejudice' letter with an offer for a F&F might be appropriate if you have sufficient funds available. (the sum I would suggest is the arrears as of the time of the issue of the DN 'cos that is all they should be awarded in court; however note the 'should', no guarantees)

 

What date does your AQ have to be in court?

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi foolishgirl,

 

The defense I used, was the one in post 144 from 42man.

 

Have not received anything else from the court yet.

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What date does your AQ have to be in court?

 

What date remus?? Is it specified on the order?

 

 

Have not received anything else from the court yet.

 

Did you get an AQ - Form N149 or Form 150?

If not, was the claim over £5000? That limit usually determines the form number i.e. SC or Fast track. You can download the correct form from HMCS so no worries there.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just catching up with your thread again remus.

 

Let me get this straight:

 

1. The court struck out Claim 1 because Claimant didn't return paperwork on time

 

2. **** issued Claim 2 for the same thing.

 

3. You didn't issue defence on time, judgment was made by default. You applied for set aside & got it.

 

4. Claimant has now claimed that the 2nd claim shouldn't be struck out as res judicata because of case law Securum Finance v Ashton & anor (that doesn't seem to actually apply to your case!) & the DJ has accepted this argument & issued above order.

 

5. Back to Square 1

 

Is that a correct assessment?

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just catching up with your thread again remus.

 

Let me get this straight:

 

1. The court struck out Claim 1 because Claimant didn't return paperwork on time Yes

 

2. **** issued Claim 2 for the same thing. Yes

 

3. You didn't issue defence on time, judgment was made by default. You applied for set aside & got it. Yes

 

4. Claimant has now claimed that the 2nd claim shouldn't be struck out as res judicata because of case law Securum Finance v Ashton & anor (that doesn't seem to actually apply to your case!) & the DJ has accepted this argument & issued above order.

 

No. Post 137 is the hearing, and the 1st order was issued

 

Order 1 July

 

1 Judgement is set aside

 

2 The Defendant do file and serve a Defence by July (done)

 

3 The ICO is discharged and the hearing vacated

 

4 No order for costs

 

 

The 2nd order is a different Judge, and has been issued after I put in my defence as per the order above.

 

The 2nd order

The court on its own motion and having ordered the parties to file Allocation Questionnaires by a separate order made today. (not received yet) I have not received a separate order to file the AQ, so have no date.

 

5. Back to Square 1

 

Is that a correct assessment?

 

Hope this is clearer foolishgirl :confused:

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

.........The Judge read the dates, looked in his cpr book, and said it clearly states 14 days, and the default has been incorrectly delivered, as there is only 7.

 

I now have to base my defence on the default notice, and have about 2 weeks to do so...........

 

remus

 

AFAIK. 14 days re DN came into force in 19 Dec 2006! (your DN is dated 3 oct 2006). anyway, your DN doesn't even appear to provide 7 clear days after service even if deemed first class?

Edited by Ford
typo add'n
Link to post
Share on other sites

remus

 

AFAIK. 14 days re DN came into force in 19 Dec 2006! (your DN is dated 3 oct 2006). anyway, your DN doesn't even appear to provide 7 clear days after service even if deemed first class?

 

Thanks Ford for the reminder - this had been noted, Post #68

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What date does your AQ have to be in court?

 

Did you get anAQlink3.gif - Form N149 or Form 150? If not, was the claim over £5000?

 

Can you answer the above remus please?

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

Should I stop paying my nominal amount as it is in the court process? or will this put me in a bad light me with the Judge?

 

[problem] have referred to my payment in the latest communication from them, as if it was an admission of guilt on my part.

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi all, couple of questions, doing WS, am I right in thinking if SCM letter has 'without prejudice' I am unable to use this as evidence?

 

Also as the WS has to be done simultaneous can I ring SCM as time is short!

 

thank you

 

also am I allowed to mention what went on in mediation? or is that also a no no as I have no proof. (think I'm answering my own questions!)

Edited by remus

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

SCM have admitted on their WS that the DN does not contain the correct number of days to remedy the breach, but carry on to say the Final Demand was not sent for two months. They quote case law Amex v Ian Karl Robert Brandon 2010.

 

I have no Final Demand, there is nothing with the WS except enforcement notice, DN, loan agreement and statements. Do they not need to prove it?

 

SCM are asking for the Court to decide the claim based on the written evidence. I have noted that the Judge's are issuing Judgement on the fact you owe the money end of, but I have never denied this, the POC stated I had not paid, and I always have, even if it was a nominal amount as worked out with the CAB.

 

Anyone any thoughts on what I need to do next?

 

help!

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They quote case law Amexlink3.gif v Ian Karl Robert Brandon 2010.

 

 

 

I understand that the case above is subject to an appeal hearing .. soon...

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they able to use the above case if it is subject to appeal?

 

Why issue a DN if they are not going to act on it?

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brandon is making an application to appeal.

 

However in Brandon there were enough days albeit the wording was wrong.

 

The DN gave "14 days from the date of service"

 

BUT because of the statutory wording that DN contains saying "14 days from teh date above", the date was taken to mean the date of issue (being the only date stated)

 

The DJ felt that although the wording became confusing that no prejudice was caused against Brandon because he never intended rectifying the default.

 

HOWEVER the 14 days from service was there not 11 days or 12 days

 

There are very important differences - but the creditors are jumping on it because of a quote being used out of context ...... as usual

 

Read the whole transcript

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...