Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • retailer said they'd speak to dpd on Tuesday. I don't want to screw the retailer because they were doing me a favour by fixing it for free  I hope dpd will refund them so they don't lose out. Will keep you guys posted. 
    • Well, we live on the same road so it should be the same postcode. When I spoke to dpd and asked why were my neighbours' address not on the list and she said maybe they're not of the same postcode and I checked and they definitely were. Not to mention, delivery instructions are supposed to override actual customer's address which is why they asked for instructions I thought.
    • again a quick google search states Appeal a DVLA fine - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) i would not be appealing mind. it's only a summary charge which they rarely do court on and pass out the powerless DCA's whom are not bailiffs they have 6mts. see where they go. as you've sorn'd it will probably be nulled. dx  
    • There are a number of reasons why you may not have been issued a notice in the post within 14 days. If you were stopped by the police it may have been given verbally. In the case of speeding offences, the police may issue you with a conditional offer of a fixed penalty of 3 points and £100.00 fine by post or an offer of a speed awareness course. If the offence is considered too serious for a speed awareness course or fixed penalty you may be charged with an offence which normally occurs by way of the issue of a Single Justice Procedure Notice. If the vehicle within which the alleged offence took place was registered to another person or company there is technically no need for a notice to be issued to the driver. After the police have obtained details of the nominated the driver, they will normally send the notice to them, although there are no time limits within which they must do so (provided that the notice was received within 14 days by the registered keeper of the vehicle). In such circumstances, a person may receive a notice several months after the alleged offence too place but still be prosecuted. A Guide to a Notice of Intended Prosecution | Motoring Offence Lawyers the above copy n paste link has purely been copy n pasted here to inform you of the regs, which you could have done yourself by, as this is, a google search......... we do not ever recommend using such offered webservices! dont dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SLC vs Old Recotry ***WON***


oldrectory
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5671 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Just thought id start a thread about my case so that I can keep you informed and get advice if needed.

 

Send Prelim and subsequently the letter before action.

 

Got a letter back telling me that charges are fine, have OFT approval - usual rubbish!

 

Posted (via registered) Small Claim to local County Court today claiming charges and interest @ 8% today! Sent a copy to SLC (via registered) and kept a copy for myself!

 

Used noomill's Particulars of Claim with usual amendments for my case.

 

So watch this space!

 

This site is great - the advice on this is so good esp the stuff on CCA requests!

 

Thanks

 

Oldrectory

 

Cabot - CCA request - Defaulted

Thames Credit - CCA Request - Defaulted

Robinson Way - CCA Request - Defaulted

Lowell - CCA request - Defaulted

Littlewoods - CCA request - No CCA - Written Off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Oops, sorry, but you may have made a wee mistake.

 

You should have sent all three copies to your local court.

 

They are all processed and stamped, then one copy is served on your defendant (SLC) and a duly processed and stamped copy sent back to you.

 

 

Go down to your local court and give them another two copies to add to the one you sent, apologising for your mistake.

Edited by noomill060
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

HI,

 

Just had this letter from the SLC

 

We refer to the above and acknowledge receipt of your recent claim through Taunton County Court.

 

We have now had an opportunity to review your file and we note that you have three loans accounts with us. The claim you have made is in respect of charges incurred over each of these accounts. We note in particular that you are in arrears in respect of your 98/99 loan account in sum of £127.93.

 

Whilst your claim is made in respect of the charges against your account, you have in fact only paid charges in sum of £40.05. From a litigation point of view, you are therefore unable to claim the outstanding sum of £199.95 since no loss has been suffered by you in this regard.

 

We do note that you have made reasonable attempts to offer repayment arrangements towards the arrears and in the circumstances, as a gesture of goodwill, provided you are willing to make an additional one off payment of £71.95, we are willing to offset the current payments you have made in respect of charges (£40.05) against the arrears. In addition, we note that you have a credit balance of £15.93 against your 1990 loan account which we would also be wiling to offset against your current arrears. The net result of the payment from you and the offset of the sums you have paid in respect of charges means that you would therefore be up to date in respect of your payments and no further charges would be levied against you.

 

If you are willing to agree to these terms, we would be grateful if you would contact our Shareen Auckbarallee, Solicitor on 0141 306 2068 or by email as undernoted immediately.

 

My main concern with this letter is the bit about not being able to claim because I have not paid the charges. These charges have been applied to my account and are accruing interest - so surely I can ask them to be refunded through the court and it doesn't matter that I haven't actually paid them?

 

Regarding the offset of the charges etc - They can run and jump - seeing as they talk about the payments I have made they are hardly doing me a favor!!!!

 

Regarding the arrears - I'm assuming this makes no difference whatsoever and they are just trying to make me feel guilty?

 

Please help and give advice - I need to reply to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just stick with your claim, don't worry about any of the stuff they send you. They tried to claim all sorts of stuff with me so I left them to it, eventually they just completely fell on their own sword and paid up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Had a reply from SLC!

 

They are willing to refund ALL charges to my account and refund the ones I have already paid to me.

 

They state that they do not charge interest on the charges - has anyone any real proof that they don't. I can't seem to work it out from my statements.

 

I have said that if they remove them from my account, they must be removed at the date they were added - so as to recalculate any interest added.

 

They say they will not refund the court costs.

 

HELP HELP HELP

 

I am actually happy that they will refund the charges - but what should I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

After provisionally accepting on the phone to their offer, I wrote back to them (faxing and e-mailing it) refusing their offer, pointing out why and telling them I wouldn't accept anything else but full refund of charges, interest and court fee. The letter I send is below

 

DECLINE OF OFFER

 

Thank you for your letter dated 6th October 2006, attached to your e-mail.

 

Following our discussion on the phone yesterday, I have taken more time to reflect on your offer and taken further advice. Having done so, I have decided to decline your current offer.

 

I would like to make the following points:

 

• I currently have a satisfactory arrangement set up to pay off the arrears on my 98/99 loan. As far as I am aware these arrears will be paid in full in December 2008, I wish to keep this arrangement in place.

• Please read my ‘Particulars of Claim’ very carefully. You will see my reasons why I believe the charges should be removed/refunded from my account. I believe it completely inappropriate that you make it a condition of their refund for me to pay off any arrears. I will certainly be supplying this information and my views on this to the Judge, once a court date has been obtained.

• These charges have been added to my account, increasing the balance. Interest is accrued on the outstanding balance. Therefore, interest does accrue on the charges. In your confidence that you believe that you do not add interest, you could perhaps provide detailed calculations on the interest I have paid to show this.

• I did not state that the Student Loans Company repaid customers for charges they hadn’t yet paid. They have, however, removed charges from accounts. No offer, other than full refund/removal and refund of interest and court fee, was accepted in the two cases, which were both settled out of court.

 

I am still not willing to accept your offer. The only acceptable outcome is, as stated in the Particulars of Claim, refund/removal of charges, refund of interest accrued and court costs.

 

 

Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this, Ive rewritten your letter, removing some bits that didnt make sense and added some bits that do.

 

The solicitor refered to at Harper Macleod is the one I dealt with. the email addy was genuine at the time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

• I have a satisfactory arrangement set up to pay off the arrears on my 98/99 loan. As far as I am aware, these arrears will be paid in full in December 2008, I wish to keep this arrangement in place.

 

• With this in mind, I regard your condition that I repay arrears as mischievous and will be delighted to to draw the Judge's attention to this should the opportunity arise.

 

• I believe these charges have been unfairly and unlawfully debited to my account, (contrary to UTTCR) thus unlawfully increasing the balance.

 

Interest naturally accrues on the outstanding total balance.

 

Clearly, interest has been levied unlawfully on the charges. Any claim to the contrary can only be construed as ignorant, foolish nonsense or an intentional attempt to profit from the aforementioned unlawfully applied debits.

 

I note that SLC has never provided any evidence to the contrary.

 

 

• I did not state that the Student Loans Company repaid customers for charges they hadn’t yet paid. I am aware that SLC have removed charges and interest unlawfully applied thereon, from other accounts and can provide court claim numbers, full documention in the matter from SLC's solicitor at Harper Macleod (Ms Stephanie Lyn).

 

I believe Stephanie can be contacted at:

 

xxxxxxxxx@XXXXXXX (real addy sent by pm to old rectory)

 

 

My conditions for withdrawal of my claim remain as stated in my PoC.

 

a) full refund/removal of unlawfully applied debits and refund/removal of interest subsequently applied thereon.

 

b) court fee

 

c) interest on the above, at the rate of 8% per annum, pursuant to the County Courts Act 1984.

 

 

Your are reminded that you are the defendant in this case and you are not in any postion to set conditions.

 

I repeat, the only acceptable outcome is, as stated in the Particulars of Claim, refund/removal of charges, refund of interest accrued and court costs.

 

Do not insult my intelligence further.

Edited by noomill060
Link to post
Share on other sites

HI,

 

Got a reply - haven't got the e-mail in front of me so will have to go form memory:

 

Any claim to the contrary can only be construed as ignorant, foolish nonsense or an intentional attempt to profit from the aforementioned unlawfully applied debits.

 

- Told me that this could be construed and seen a libelous

 

I note that SLC has never provided any evidence to the contrary.

 

- Said that as the claimant it is up to me to prove that they had charged me interest

 

Stated that I basically didn't have a hope in hell because they have refunded charges, offered me £30 as a inconvenience payment and that if I was to continue to court I would be doing so on claims that couldn't be substantiated and didn't stand up in law.

 

 

I did reply, stating that I didn't have to prove the interest had been charged because as the defendant and the company that provided the loan, it was up to them to show it hadn't been charged. I stated that I was sure that under the CCA, they had to show that the interest charged correctly and that I could ask for this to be provided to me.

 

I also said that it wasn't up to them to decide if it was a case that would stand up in law - it was down to the judge.

 

Can anyone help - I think they should prove that they haven't charged interest - if they are so confident then why wont they just show me>????

 

Thanks

 

Oldrectory

 

 

 

I said that it didn't mater if the charges had been refunded as the interest would still exist on the account.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are correct in that the onus is always on the claimant (in this case, yourself) to show that money is owed. The defendant (in this case SLC) doesnt need to prove otherwise.

 

What is the total amount you are claiming?

 

(Charges + interest + court fee + the county court interest @8%)

 

 

 

 

How much have they offered you?

 

 

Any claim to the contrary can only be construed as ignorant, foolish nonsense or an intentional attempt to profit from the aforementioned unlawfully applied debits.

 

- Told me that this could be construed and seen a libelous.

 

 

What - in a private email? Libel is a published comment which exposes an indivual to:

 

Hatred, ridicule or contempt or which causes him to be shunned or avoided or which has a tendency to injure him in his office, trade or profession in the estimation of right-thinking members of society generally.

 

SLC is a government department, not an individual.

 

The person who wrote that email to you clearly has no idea what they are on about. They are just trying to mess with your head.

 

(Dont panic, they havent even entered a defence yet!) :-)

Edited by noomill060
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I am claiming charges, interest @ 8% and court fee.

 

They have actually removed all charges from my account (as of yesterday) and offered to pay me £30 as a one off to cover my trouble (Which covers court fee) so the only thing they haven't and say wont pay is the interest.

 

Surely I can ask them to show me that the interest they have charged is correctly calculated? If they do it can be shown one way or the other whether they have added interest on the charges. Can I use the CCA to do this?

 

Thanks

 

Oldrectory

Link to post
Share on other sites

SLC only charge interest at the rate of inflation, so it would not be very much and I didnt bother with it.

 

Ive just checked my POC and what I claimed for (and got) was:

 

Removal of charges

 

Court fee

 

Interest charged at 8% p.a. from the date of each charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres part 5 of my PoC:

 

5) Accordingly the Applicant claims:

 

a) the removal of the amounts debited to the Account in respect of unlawful charges in the sum of £212.

 

 

b) Court costs;

 

c) Interest pursuant to section 69 County Courts Act 1984 as set out on the attached list of charges, or at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's exactly what I put in my PoC.

 

Should I accept seeing as the interest might only be a very small amount and they have actually refunded the charges and giving me £30?

 

How did you get them to give you the interest @8%?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, Ive re-read your thread from the start.

 

They have removed the charges and they want to reimburse the money you have already paid plus an extra £30. Correct?

 

They have refused to pay you court fee but they want to pay you £30?

 

 

They dont seem to realise that when a claim is filed you can claim an extra 8% county court interest.

 

OK.

 

So, they have basically given in all bar the shouting and dont want to go to court.

 

How much was the court fee? About £30?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...