Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

New Approach from the Abbey ?


kippax
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6537 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been monitoring events on this site for a while. Just basically doing a little personal research.

 

Probably like many I was hesitant about going ahead.

 

However this month they took the usual 4 days to clear a cheque and on the third day KB'd a number of DDs on the account. The result was over £200 in bank charges which I will now have to find. Basically it means I will not be able to cover my mortgage next month.

 

It was really the final straw. Still I tried the usual thing of ringing them. After 3 or 4 attempts at avoiding the Asian call centre I finally got through to one in the UK.

 

Explained that I was at the end of my teather and asked if he was aware of the number of people currently queuing up to take them to task over this. He seemed very well informed and even mentioned the OFT decision and indriectly this site. However he also said there was absolutely nothing they could do over the phone aside from a £50 gesture refund. He recommended that I make an appointment at a local branch. I expalined that I had tried in the past to sort out other issues at the branch, but on each occasion was simply referred to the phone on the wall.

 

He was very persistent and insisted that on this matter, there would be somebody that could help.

 

So I'm presently going back through 6 years of statements, over 3 accounts and creating a spreadsheet to detail exactly the charges that have been levvied against me.

 

Does anybody else think that this will be a fruitless visit ? Could I just use it as an opportunity initiate my claim ? Has anybody else had a similar invite ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anybody else think that this will be a fruitless visit ? Could I just use it as an opportunity initiate my claim ? Has anybody else had a similar invite ?

 

Waste of time in regards to getting all your money back, but you could take your DPA letter and set the ball rolling. Get a signed receipt for letter and £10 fee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I imagined as such.

 

So away we go.... :grin:

 

I have my statements so I can skip the DPA bit yeh ?

 

Just a little advice pls.

 

I have 3 Abbey accounts. 2 in my name, 1 is joint. Am I right in thinking that I need to make at least 2 claims, 3 if the total claim for the accounts in my name exceeds £5K ?

 

1 more question. Looking at the available spreadsheets. There seem 2 available. 1 with accrued interest on the incorrectly debited charges and one without. Whatever, I dont use the one with 8% on until a fle is claimed. So what is the difference between the accrued interest spreadsheet and the 8% one ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 3 Abbey accounts. 2 in my name, 1 is joint. Am I right in thinking that I need to make at least 2 claims, 3 if the total claim for the accounts in my name exceeds £5K

If all 3 total less than £5000, you can make 1 claim. Otherwise make 2 claims so that each is below £5000

 

1 more question. Looking at the available spreadsheets. There seem 2 available. 1 with accrued interest on the incorrectly debited charges and one without. Whatever, I dont use the one with 8% on until a fle is claimed. So what is the difference between the accrued interest spreadsheet and the 8% one ?

Second spraedsheet is to calculate the interest charged on the penalty charges. You add this to the penalty charges in the prelim and LBA letters (this spreadsheet also has a separate sheet for calculating the 8%)

 

First spreadsheet is only for s69 county Court Act interest of 8% on the charges + interest on penalties, but you don't claim this until you file at court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...