Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit/connaught Stautory Demand - HFC card?


Pimlico
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5734 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

can anybody help me I am tearing my hair out here and dont have a clue what to do! I received a statutory demand from Connaught Collections and the time has expired ie the 18 and 21 days. I have been ill off work for about 20 months and have not been able to pay because I dont have an income. I sent a letter saying about my illness and a letter from my doctor. Im not actually sure what ths dbt is I think it could be for HSBC online credit car but not sure. Connaught collections latest letter is as follows:

 

Dear Bla Bla

 

Re: bankrupcy action 1st Credit Ltd HFC Outstanding Debt £XXXX.XX

 

I write to inform you that we are now in a position to present a Bankrupcy Petition against you following the recent delivery of our Staturtory Demand.

 

As you have chosen to either ignore the Statutory Demand or demonstrate an ability to pay the sum claimed, you leave us with little alternative other than to present a Petition.

 

Once a Petition is issued I should point out that the amount payable would increase with expenses, fees and costs including those of the Trustee following the Bankruptcy.

 

The Trustee will be invited to liquidate you assest/estate e.g. property, with a view of settling this matter.

 

A copy of this letter is retained on our file for later production to the court to demonstrate that every effort has been made on our part gto avoid this intended action.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Mr R maggs

Insolvency Department

 

 

:(

Edited by Pimlico
too much info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello pt2537 thankyou for replying to me so quickly.

 

I went through a debt adviser from the local council and he said that he contacted contacted Connaught and they had agreed not to do anything.

 

He told me in the meeting that the statutory demand may not be valid because it didn't have my local court details on it but theirs.

 

The debt adviser is very busy quite understandably but reading through some of the things on CAG I think he should have helped me to get it set aside or at least something in writing from connaught collections.

 

I have had mental health issues for the past 20 months or so and the adviser has been helping me with this.

 

He was arranged through the local NHS mental health trust.

 

I am alot better know than I was and able to take on some of these things to get them sorted out and i am hoping to get a little job shortly so that I can gain some confidence back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How was ithe stat demand served? in person by server or through the post? if it came through normal post, you might be able to fight the petition by saying you didnt receive the stat demand. I am sure someone will be along shortly to confirm this. gl :)

Edited by madjenny1
change wording
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that madjenny1, the only thing is the debt adviser for the council phoned them so they know i've had it, but i dont think he confirmed the date of when i received it from them. The Stat demand was sent via the normal post and not recorded delivery or anything. if i was going to fight it what do i need to fight it on? thanks for your help i am really grateful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found this on another debt site for you, hope it is of some help before someone else comes along who can help you.

 

IF the creditor does go ahead with a petition, then they have to present a sworn affidavit to the Court to certify when and how the Demand was served, which they obviously can't do if they just posted it (or at least not without perjuring themselves).

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

your very welcome, I know all too well how worrying this stuff can be. The guy that posted the above information is a lawyer that helps out on a different site, so as far as I am aware and from other stuff I have read on this site it is correct. I am sure someone else will confirm this that knows more than me. Good luck to you. let us know how you get on.

 

Ps. have a read of this too

 

Point 2

Besides all the foregoing, the creditor at present would be unable to verify on oath when the SD came into your hands. Being unable to do this prevents the creditor from fulfiling the requirements of rule 6.11.

 

rule 6.11 says:

(1) Where under section 268 the petition must have been preceded by a statutory demand, there must be filed in court, with the petition, an affidavit or affidavits proving service of the demand.

(2) Every affidavit must have exhibited to it a copy of the demand as served.

(3) Subject to the next paragraph, if the demand has been served personally on the debtor, the affidavit must be made by the person who effected that service.

(4) If service of the demand (however effected) has been acknowledged in writing either by the debtor himself, or by some person stating himself in the acknowledgement to be authorised to accept service on the debtor's behalf, the affidavit must be made either by the creditor or by a person acting on his behalf, and the acknowledgement of service must be exhibited to the affidavit.

(5) If neither paragraph (3) nor paragraph (4) applies, the affidavit or affidavits must be made by a person or persons having direct personal knowledge of the means adopted for serving the statutory demand, and must—

(a) give particulars of the steps which have been taken with a view to serving the demand personally, and

(b) state the means whereby (those steps having been ineffective) it was sought to bring the demand to the debtor's attention, and

© specify a date by which, to the best of the knowledge, information and belief of the person making the affidavit, the demand will have come to the debtor's attention.

(6) The steps of which particulars are given for the purposes of paragraph (5)(a) must be such as would have sufficed to justify an order for substituted service of a petition.

(7) If the affidavit specifies a date for the purposes of compliance with paragraph (5)©, then unless the court otherwise orders, that date is deemed for the purposes of the Rules to have been the date on which the statutory demand was served on the debtor.

(:cool: Where the creditor has taken advantage of Rule 6.3(3) (newspaper advertisement), the affidavit must be made either by the creditor himself or by a person having direct personal knowledge of the circumstances; and there must be specified in the affidavit—

(a) the means of the creditor's knowledge or (as the case may be) belief required for the purposes of that Rule, and

(b) the date or dates on which, and the newspaper in which, the statutory demand was advertised under that Rule; and there shall be exhibited to the affidavit a copy of any advertisement of the statutory demand.

(9) The court may decline to file the petition if not satisfied that the creditor has discharged the obligation imposed on him by Rule 6.3(2).

 

You will see that included in the strict requirements of rule 6.11, the court still has power to decline to file the petition if not satisfied the creditor has discharged the obligation under 6.3(2).

 

We know service was by 2nd class post. Service that way doesn't discharge the obligation. A petition is not going to get past the filing clerk, UNLESS service can be established by some other way, ie (a) because you wrote to them acknowledging service or (b) you said so in an application to set the SD aside

Edited by madjenny1
more added
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello madjenny1 thank you again for your help and the info. Do I try and get the sat demand set aside or do I just ignore it? If I try and get it set aside what might I need to say? I;m sorry to be a pain but I am hopeless when it comes to this sort of thing. Your advices would be appreciated. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Pimlico.....in the first instance send off for a request for your Consumer Credit Agreement (providing this alleged debt is for a credit card or a loan. (do this as soon as possible) send letter 'N' off to Connaught with a £1 postal order enclosed and send it by recorded / guaranteed delivery. You can find letter 'N' here. DO NOT HAND SIGN THE LETTER. - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also have to ask...when was the last time you made a payment towards the debt ? or acknowledged it ?

 

It would seem to be one of the 'false' statutory demands that Connaught seem to throw around, however do not ignore it, although it is difficult now as the 18 days has elapsed... BUT I would ring/visit your local court, and enquire whether anything has been lodged with the court....if it hasn't, ask them about the legality of these demands....one guy was told a couple of days ago on receiving one of these false demands to take it to the magistrates court as it is an abuse of process....

 

have a read here...

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/103839-cca-1st-credit-connaught.html?highlight=HAK

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 42man

 

Thank you for your help. I will send cca request this morning. I havent paid a penny on this for at least 12 to 14 mths since I havent had any income and have relied on my family for support. I appreciate your links and it is very helpful in getting my mind around all this and getting things in perspective. I will go to the courts in the morning (got Marston Bailiffs coming round today on another debt matter so I want to be about just incase they try and break in). I'll keep you posted Thank you again for your support. Pim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Honey OMG this is brilliant and you were wonderful yesterday with all the support you gave me. As you can see I am getting some good advice here and I actually managed to get a peaceful nights sleep which is amazing since I am bordering on the edge of bankrupcy! I am just waiting for Marstons the High Court enforcement officers to turn up as they promised to today (for another debt) but as yet they havent. I am prepared I think cos my 2 kids (5 and 6 Yrs Old) are about so I dont think they can enforce anything but I'll keep my doors and windows locked all the same and I have moved my car which has an HP on it thank goodness. Best to be safe than sorry! I really do appreciate your help and if you were here I would give you a big hug! Anyway, seeings you aren't I made a small donation to CAG yesterday instead! Thanks again I'm going to see if I can learn a bit more about this site so I am not so useless at finding out info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You MUST go to the court to get the stat demand set aside, but make sure you claim your costs too.....it is far easier to get it set aside at this stage than to fight a bankruptcy petition....

 

You need to do this as soon as possible.....

 

Dispute on the debt due to non production of the Consumer Credit Agreement pertaining to the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

Dispute the debt due to excessive charges also

Link to post
Share on other sites

I request the statuttory demand is dismissed/set aside due to the dispute of thise debt.

 

1) Failure to provide a copy of my Consumer Credit Agreement under the Consumer Credit Act

 

2) Excessive charges that have potentially been added to the account.

 

3) I would gracefully request the court grant my costs against the claimant.

 

I believe the facts herewith in this form are true.

Costs are £9;25 per hour litigant in person

Postage and parking added too...

 

2)

 

Use the forms from here..

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dca-legal-successes/86067-getting-statutory-demand-set.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

I tell you I am getting really mad with Counaughts and there SD.

 

42 Man-CAG we need to put an end to this and get our heads together and get this in the public knowledge. Anybody got any good ideas how we can do this.

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to 1st Credit/connaught Stautory Demand - HFC card?
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...