Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Dealing with a fraudulent eBay seller


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5769 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've been using eBay quite regularly and it would appear that I have now run in to my first [problem] seller. There were none of the obvious signs of a dishonest seller, however I made a purchase for £270 just under two weeks ago and have had no reply to my repeated emails to the seller. I have also had a few emails from another buyer who purchased from the same seller and is in the same boat.

 

I've filed a dispute with PayPal, but I'm wary about escalating to a full PayPal claim because I know that the buyer protection policy does not cover the full amount. I assume that it would be better to just issue a chargeback with the bank to ensure that I get the total refund, but I'm open to any other suggestions about this.

 

The other thing that I would like to know is where to take it from here - I have a name and phone number which I assume to be genuine, but then again I have no proof of that. Although I am reasonably confident I can reclaim the money, it still feels as though there should be some way that I can report the fraud to the police or the courts. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Edited by MoonBuggy
Link to post
Share on other sites

As for reporting him to the police, great big waste of time IMO. I was once the victim of someone who scammed hundreds of people to the tune of tens of thousands of pounds, with all the info given, proof and everything, the CPS decided not to proceed, so if it's only a couple of people who have been done, I wouldn't hold my breath at the police dealing with this. :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

After speaking to a very helpful forum member privately, I've called the bank and requested a chargeback, so I shouldn't be out of pocket, at least. There seemed no point in spending a month waiting for a PayPal claim when it would only have refunded half my money anyway.

 

It looks like I wouldn't have enough information to report him, even if I wanted to. I just find that very annoying - even more so, now that you say they probably wouldn't pursue it, Bookworm. When I think of all the stupid things they spend police time on, it's just unbelievable that someone who is stealing money from multiple people gets off with nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My brother's having one hell of a time with paypal at the mo too after a seller decided they'd changed their mind and weren't selling. He won an xbox 360 which he was gonna give his kids to keep them quiet over the summer hols. Paid for it with an echeck (they wouldn't accept a direct payment at the time for some reason) and the buyer decided to bail. Because the money lies unclaimed, paypal won't return it for 30 days! There goes the summer hols, and the promise to the kids.

 

Paypal really do get my goat up at times ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i use ebay for both buying and selling and it's people like these sellers that should be stopped. personally i'd escalate the paypal claim and report them through ebay. they do favour the buyer, as they should. and hopefully the seller should be rightly banned from trading.

and don't be afraid of negative feedback, they deserve it and other buyers need to be warned.

just my opinion...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone

Sorry, don't agree with what you said 'favouring the buyer, as they should'. No such thing, then as a '[problem] buyer/dishonest buyer?' Sorry, but there are! Yes, there are dishonest sellers ... but there are always TWO sides to things. And this is where Ebay/PAYPAL acts unfairly, cos they take sides. Meaning some poor, honest seller out there who has done everything possible to alleviate the problem in human means short of flying to another country, knocking on the person's door to have it out with them reasonably. There is no protection on Ebay for the honest seller. And you get one dishonest buyer it can ruin you for good. If buyers aren't arguing over the cost of postage if it exceeds cost of a stamp, it's something else. Thing is, when buyers bid they are entering a contract with the seller to abide by the terms of the auction including postage costs ... costs set by the Royal Mail, including reasonable packging costs paid for by the seller from a shop somewhere so are within legal rights to charge as is any other shop out there unless subsidized with an agreement via Royal Mail for business rate mail.

 

Then there's the 'oh my cat spilt milk on the keyboard and hit the enter key and won the auction' or 'my nephew was on my computer, and I am not computer literate being 90 odd so didn't know what he was doing ...' or 'my little brother bid on the item and I don't want it now'. Just some of the examples sellers have faced on Ebay. Sellers pay fees, buyes do not. Sellers are not protected on Ebay or with Paypal full stop!

 

So, it's never always just one sided. There are thousands of [problem] buyers on Ebay. Always have been, in all walks of life whether it's an auction, a shop ... it happens.

 

From stolen credit cards, to out and out scams from criminal gangs on Ebay. These are the threats genuinely honest sellers face. So, it's not all one sided. Be a perfect world if it were. It's not, however.

 

I just thought I'd make this point to balance things. That is it not always the fault of the seller. Some people you can give a gold star service to and it will never be enough.

 

It's very easy to hit that 'chargeback' or 'escalate claim' but ... I wonder how many buyers who do this think to themselves 'am I being honest here?' Cos for those who do hit that key purely because it gives them some power of someone ... it can bring hell into their lives whether justified or not.

 

As someone who HAS been a victim of a [problem] buyer ... it's not a very nice thing to happen to you. I was put in hospital with the stress it caused me. I was just being honest, the buyer was lying through their back teeth! Now I have a lifelong health problem because of them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It's been a little while since I last posted here, but I've been trying to deal with the bank, who have been extremely unhelpful. They've finally sent me a letter explaining that because PayPal fulfilled their duty in forwarding the money, I have no recourse and cannot issue a chargeback. I am completely at a loss as to what to do now - PayPal's dispute process is still running, but I'll still be out by a significant amount of money when that finally finishes, and I can't believe that both the bank and PayPal are able to simply say "Sorry, not our problem" when somone has stolen money from me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...