Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Chris Vs Lloyds Tsb


chris-b
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6350 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

Well its been 14 days and not heard athing from anyone, is this normal do you think? or do they drag it out the full 28 days?:confused:

Hi

Have they acknowledged the claim? You might be better giving your court a ring in the morning.

Barty :)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi

I should of kept my mouth shut, :o

The postman has just brought me a letter from the courts!!

It is the notice that a Defence has been filed,

It has come with the AC and i have to get it back by the 11/12/06 and send a fee of £100.00,

there is also a letter of defence sent with it aswell, is this standard?

IF I DO WIN? Will i be able to claim the £100.00 back aswell?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

WHEN you win you will get your £100 back.

Have a look at this for help in filling out your AQ:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

 

Barty :)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Barty,

The bit i was unsure of is that section G has a lot of text but only the bit about the case lasting one hour is highlighted in red, do i only insert this text or do i add more?? thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can request Standard Disclosure:

 

I am respectfully requesting that my claim be allocated to the small claims track. This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the Defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their actual costs and I am surprised the Defendant did not counterclaim for these, because I would have paid them without argument.

 

However, the continuing problem is, (in common with the 100s of other cases currently being brought by other bank customers), that the banks refuse to reveal the details of their penalty-charging regime. As the banks have a fiduciary duty towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly and in utmost good faith.

 

Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that the court in this case, not withstanding allocation to the small claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in the courts discretion to do so. This would bring a rapid end, not only to this litigation, but would also likely bring an end to much of the litigation in progress against other high-street banks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi There.

I have been working away so havnt been able to keep you updated on my battle with lloyds,

well here goes, Not much has happenned apart from i took my AQ to the courts today and paid my £100 but when i got home i found a letter from S,C&M with a copy of there AQ that they have sent to the courts, In the bit at the back 'other information' they have put ' The Defendent intends to rely upon its defence and the terms and conditions that govern the account'

Is this a normal response from their solicitors?:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I was just wondering if anyone could answer the above question as i have looked through the FAQs and cant see anything, i am just a bit concerned that there solicitors have sent an AQ to the courts??

any views would help, thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Did you claim for all your o/d interest or just the part that you are entitled to?

I'm sure if you've claimed for it all, Lloyds will just adjust the amount accordingly when they settle, so I don't think this will be a problem.

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Barty,

Yes i claimed for the O/D interesrt aswell as the bank charges, i just went through every statement i had and claimed for everything that i could see that was against me, I think i got mixed up in the early stages as to what interest to claim, until i realised when i seen the spreadsheet that worked it out on this site! But i had already put the claim in by then so i just left it at that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

At last i have had a reply from the courts,

The date is set for 19th march 07,

I hope it doesnt go as far as that and lloyds settle before?

is there anything else i need to do in the time between now and then?

chris..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chris,

 

In the letter from the court informing you of your court date were you given instructions to provide copies of all documents you intend to use as evidence to the court and the bank 14 days before the hearing? This is the court bundle an if you have been instructed to prepare one then it's a good idea to start gathering information. Check out bookworm's Basic Court Bundle post to get an idea of what you need to include. If there are no directions on the letter to do this it might be an idea to get in touch with the court - just to double check that you don't need to do one.

 

Good luck. Lucid :)

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

*Won unconditionally with contractual interest (29.85% compounded)

Lucid's Account - £749.62 * Joint Account - £2019.64 * Mindzai's Account - £595.65

*All settled in full - 6/2/07

*Hearings - 7/2/07

*Prelims sent - 9/8/06

_______

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...