Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Debt Settled With Other Dra - Hfo Say No!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5829 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I'm new to this site and would like advice regarding an old Barclaycard account. I received a letter from the DCA with a settlement figure of £225.96 which at the time I could afford to pay so sent a cheque (I'm awaiting a copy of the chq as I can't remember the company's name). HFO are now chasing me for this debt which is now at a staggering 435.80 (NOT INCLUDING THE £255 I'VE ALREADY PAID). They say that unless I have a letter stating that this debt was settled I still have to pay what they say I owe. Is it worth my while chasing the previous DCA. Because of the harrassment I have been receiving from them I agreed to pay £40/mth which they say isn't enough. I've just hung up on them cos they are very arrogant (india based I think) and asked all sorts of personal questions which I refused to answer. Any advice would be much appreciated.

Edited by murray91
Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you still have the letter offering the full and final?

 

If so send a copy along with a copy of the cashed cheque to the current dca

 

Idax

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send a letter to HFO asking them to prove this debt is yours.

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

 

Your ref:

 

 

Your company has contacted me regarding an account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself to HFO.

 

I have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to HFO and in the absence of proof of the alleged debt HFO are in breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 for processing information about me without my permission.

 

I require HFO to prove that this alleged debt exists and is owed by me to them. I also require a copy of any Notice Of Assignment informing me that the alleged debt has been assigned to HFO as required by the Law of Property Act 1925 Section 136. I have no knowledge of any such Notice of Assignment having been issued.

 

Under the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance it is unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it has not been proved that they are the debtor in question.

 

OFT Guidance also states that it is unfair to pursue individuals for payment when they are not liable. It is also a breach of the Guidance to use unfair/deceptive means to try to collect payment on a debt when it has not been proved that the debt is owed by the person being pursued.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment. In the event of me suing HFO for breaches of the Data Protection Act 1998, the Consumer Credit Act 1974, OFT guidelines and physical and psychological harassment, substantial damages and all legal costs and expenses will be sought.

 

I require that HFO cease unlawful collection activity on an alleged debt which has not been proved. I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to the alleged debt’s existence and my liability for it.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed.

All correspondence MUST be in writing. BE AWARE THAT ALL PHONE CALLS ARE RECORDED and recordings will be transmitted to the OFT and used in court if necessary.

 

I trust this makes my position clear. If there is anything about this letter you do not understand, I suggest you take legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They say that unless I have a letter stating that this debt was settled I still have to pay what they say I owe. Is it worth my while chasing the previous DCA. Because of the harrassment I have been receiving from them I agreed to pay £40/mth which they say isn't enough. I've just hung up on them cos they are very arrogant (india based I think) and asked all sorts of personal questions which I refused to answer. Any advice would be much appreciated.

DO NOT PAY THEM ANYTHING. They must Prove you owe the debt not the other way around. If you have given them your card details cancel the card immediately. If you have signe a DD cancel this NOW.

 

Have you had anything in writing from these oxygen thieves.

 

NEVER SPEAK TO THEM ON THE PHONE

 

Wait until they write to you and then send them this

 

Dear Cretins

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

MorningMany thanks for you help with this matter. Unfortunately, I do not have the settlement letter but once I have received the cashed cheque back from the bank I will try and contact the previous DRA. I am also in the process of sending the letter that was kindly attached. These morons were on the phone to me on Saturday morning telling me that they were now willing to accept £40/mth but I told them to stop contacting me as I was in the process of proving the debt was no longer owed. Can someone please let me know where I can obtain the telephone harassment letter.Many thanks for all your help, it's much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there any chance that there are some excessive charges to reclaim on the account too ?? (Obviously if you can find the cheque, then that would be great...) But HFO don't give up easily, and even if you do find the cheque, they say the debt was more !!!! keep us posted....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've requested the cheque from my bank so that I can get the name of the previous DRA. This should be with me shortly. HFO say that unless I have an actual settlement letter from the previous DRA then the account is not settled. I am hoping that the previous DRA will send me this letter but am not holding my breath. I will keep you posted on any progress. I am expecting another phone call from them tonight but I'm just going to hang up. They are really cheeky though and phone back asking you why you hung up. These people must be desperate for a job and their salary must depend on what they can reclaim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are three letters which will scare off HFO and they are CCA. If they keep sending you begging letters and threatening phone calls then send a £1.00 postal order along with a CCA request to them. That will soon shut them up.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html Letter N

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...