Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC have taken me to court


santamonica
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4512 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

How many default notices can one company send for the same debt?

 

I received one from HFC in 2002, I was a student at the time with no way to pay the arrears. I resigned myself to this thinking it wouldn't show on my credit file after 6 years anyway by which time I'd be qualified and in a better financial position. I had plans to get on the property ladder when this was off my credit file.

 

The problem is they sent me another default notice about 1 year ago and now they are threatening to send me another one. This means this debt is still going to be one my file for another 6 years.

 

They have also added charges and interest continually so the debt is now about 3k more now than it was last year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It does sound very unfair to me. I don't know the answer offhand to your specific question. However it is clear that it has to stop. What are you doing about the charges? What all the figures? Do you have a thread going about this in the appropriate forum?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent my DPA request today. Also asked for copies of all default notices they have sent me (3 in 4 years all for the same debt)

 

I know I've been charged £15 nearly every month since 2003 because I'm paying a reduced amount that they agreed to

 

Gill.

 

 

this site is so addictive but it's made me realise I don't have to worry every time the phone rings, I don't have to put up with threatening letters and phonecalls.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

 

Spoke to a debt specialist in the CAB and discovered they can only issue 1 default notice per debt so they are going to help with this. After the 1st one they can go to court, wondering why they haven't done this.

 

Sent away DPA request today.

 

Have started a thread in the appropriate forum today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure that the CAB advised this, but if you check your actual credit files you will find out if they issued one or not. Experian have a 30 day free trail which will save you £2, just be sure to cancel before the deadline or else it's about £5 per month.

 

For anyone else reading and interested...

 

Default notice

A default notice is a formal letter a lender sends you when you are so far behind in your payments that they have decided your relationship with them has broken down. This varies from lender to lender but generally happens when you are between three and six months in arrears. If you receive a default notice it might mean that the lender is planning to take legal action to recover the money, but you must be notified separately of this. A default notice will almost certainly mean that the account will be shown as defaulted on your credit report, which will make it difficult for you to get credit. This information is kept on your report for six years but the balance should be updated as you make repayments and after six years it is removed, whether or not you're fully paid up.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I got my credit file a couple of weeks ago and it shows a default from this company in 2004. They sent another one on Friday which if it goes on my credit file (and knowing HFC it will) will cancel out the one from 2004 which means it will be 6 years from now before it disappears.

The CAB say that the regardless of how many defaults they issue only the first one should show on my file i.e. the one from 2002, meaning it should be removed from my file in another 2 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good - that's certainly the way I understand it. I think it's highly likely that someone at your bank hasn't bothered to find out if one had been issued in the first place.

 

I'm claiming from the Halifax at the moment, which includes a default removal, and they asked ME to provide THEM with proof it had even been issued!!

 

Idiots.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

...this site is so addictive but it's made me realise I don't have to worry every time the phone rings, I don't have to put up with threatening letters and phonecalls.

 

Quite right too, nobody should.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

I have been reading your thread which gave me some answers I am seeking, but could someone help me with one other thing....my default is due to come off, but I am still under a payment arrangement, can they put on another default after this current default is removed?

 

Thanks

Chr1sty

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yes, refer to it specifically and state the deadline.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Has anyone in Scotland taken a company to court for no credit agreement and refusing to remove a default??

 

I need to do this with HFC but don't have a clue what I need to do, what forms to fill out etc. I presume it's not a small claims action as no money is involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I'm still trying to deal with these clowns. Today I received an intention to register a default if I don't pay the outstanding amount within 28 days. There is already a default registered with the CRA's from December 2004 for the same account.

Can they register another one meaning it will be 6 years from now before it drops off my credit file?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, only one default can be made against any debt. I think they either forgot the law (not unlikely) or they are just trying to intimidate you.

 

What precisely are you doing with this? - i.e. have you started a claim or are you just making payments to them etc?

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you send them a SAR?

 

If so, when?

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I let this one slip due to other things happening and never got round to dealing with it again.

 

Now I don't have any choice they've taken me to court :shock:

 

I received the court papers a couple of weeks ago and sent them back requesting a time to pay. I received the letter this morning telling me that HFC have rejected this and a hearing date has been set :(

 

So a couple of questions;

1. this account is in joint names but my OH doesn't know it's got this far (he knows it's in serious arrears), does he have to go to the hearing or can I go by myself

2. do you think at this stage they'd take a payment as final settlement and if so for how much. The original loan was for £8050 which ended up being £16,000 approx with interest and insurance. I'm unsure of the balance still owing, the credit reference agancies says £7616 but the court papers say £8665.

3. They also say in the court papers that they defaulted this account in November 2007 but it was defaulted in December 2004 according to the CRA's. Can they now default from the court date?

 

Any help would be very welcome as I'm worried sick over this, we thought we were finally sorting ourselves out and now this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received the court papers a couple of weeks ago and sent them back requesting a time to pay. I received the letter this morning telling me that HFC have rejected this and a hearing date has been set :sad:

 

So a couple of questions;

1. this account is in joint names but my OH doesn't know it's got this far (he knows it's in serious arrears), does he have to go to the hearing or can I go by myself

2. do you think at this stage they'd take a payment as final settlement and if so for how much. The original loan was for £8050 which ended up being £16,000 approx with interest and insurance. I'm unsure of the balance still owing, the credit reference agancies says £7616 but the court papers say £8665.

3. They also say in the court papers that they defaulted this account in November 2007 but it was defaulted in December 2004 according to the CRA's. Can they now default from the court date?

 

I sent a SAR request last march and finally received everything in December but never got round to doing anything due to other things going on. To be honest I just want to get this sorted and get HFC out of my life.

 

Any help would be very welcome as I'm worried sick over this, we thought we were finally sorting ourselves out and now this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi There,

 

can i ask, did you file any form of defence or did you just admit that you owed the money?

 

have you requested the credit agreement yet? have they supplied it yet?

 

can i ask what their particulars of claim were?

 

sorry for all the questions

 

Regards

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Paul,

 

I admitted I owed the money. I've had the credit agreement but it isn't signed or dated by either myself or HFC though we do have a copy of the account set up which is signed.

Their particulars of claim were

'on or around 08 August 2000 the parties entered into a loan agreement...the defenders have failed to make payment in terms of the provisions of the agreement. They allowed arrears to accrue on their account. On or about 19 November 2007 the pursuers served a default notice on the defenders in terms of section 87(1) of the consumer credit act 1974 (I never received this, the account had already been defaulted in 2004). The defenders have failed to comply with the terms of the said notice. Accordingly the loan agreement has been terminated. As at 29 November 2007 there was a balance due for payment by the defenders to the pursuers under the said agreement in the sum of £8665 (£7616 with CRA). The said sum remains due for payment. in terms of the said agreement interest is due at the rate of 12.35% from 29 November 2007. The defenders have been called upon to make payment . They refuse or delay to do so'.

It comes from Patten & Prentice solicitors.

 

You can ask as many questions as you want :), I just want to get this sorted

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi,

 

Myself anf my OH have a loan with HFC which was started in 2000 and includes PPI. This was sold to us despite them being told I was unemployed and we didn't need it. We fell into arrears and when we tried to cancel the PPI to have lower monthly payments we were told we would have to take out a new loan which we didn't do. We eventually defualted and were taken to court last year where a monthly payment was agreed which we have been paying. I don't have any of the original docs regarding the insurance and not sure how to get these.

Could we make a claim for PPI even though we are still paying the loan back?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes ofcourse you can

 

you need to SAR HFC.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi,

 

Looking for advice concerning claiming ppi from HFC.

 

We had a loan with them in 2000 which included ppi at a cost of £2248 + £1388 interest. We should have finished paying it in 2005 but because of arrears, charges, court action etc we're still paying it off now and probably will be for the next 3 or 4 years.

 

After reading everything concerning mis-selling I'm pretty sure we have a claim because we were told we couldn't get the loan if we didn't take the insurance. When we started to fall into arrears and tried to cancel the ppi to reduce our payments we were told the only way to do this was to restructure the loan over a longer period but we would still need to take insurance to be accepted.

 

I have a copy of the loan agreement which shows the total for the loan and the insurance. I also have an annual statement which says ppi isn't included :|

 

My question is would we be able to start a claim as I presume the insurance was cancelled by them when we fell behind with payments. Is it too late to claim because the loan was started so long ago?

 

Thanks xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4512 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...