Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just noticed that one of farages favorite poops was suggesting another stealth tax of 10 quid a month - possibly per person inc children ..   Minister proposed £10 monthly insurance-style patient charge to fund NHS dentists WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Working people can’t afford another Tory tax rise,’ says Labour’s Wes Streeting   “They are framing this as some kind of pre-payment or quid pro quo, but of course, we already pay for the NHS through income tax, and in general that is a much more equitable way of doing it.” The DHSC declined to comment
    • All righty, seems I know why it was so quiet, the case was in transfer. I just got a letter from my local county court stating that they will be now taking over from Nots (dated 28 May 2024, wow) But no other correspondence so far. Will keep you posted
    • Hey,  I've messaged my husband but he is not contactable while he is in work. As soon as he is on his way home I will find out which finance company we used. I'm so sorry, I just don't know.
    • Okay, I have read your claim form. A pity you didn't come to us earlier. You haven't pleaded any legal basis for your claim and you haven't cited the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties Act. How long have you been aware of this forum? We will have to bring that out later when you do your witness statement. Once again, do the reading very carefully. I suggest that you wait until Monday before coming back here and confirming that you have read everything. And in particular, as I have indicated, read the thread which I posted above very carefully and in particular we the details of the contractual terms which were discovered and get a copy for yourself. Post a link to them in this thread as well for other people to see. They are relying on the fact that you don't have a direct contract with them and they are referring to a contractual term which is apparently in the contract between them and Packlink which specifically excludes third parties. You will definitely want to see this. They have tried to rely on this before but they have never produced the contract. In your witness statement you will have to request that they produced the contract in court. In terms of the mediation, frankly we would have advised you to decline mediation. It's all done secretively. Nothing is ever revealed and of course they will try to get you to compromise on the amount of money you are claiming. We would strenuously suggest that you don't give up a single penny. Do the reading that I have suggested, find the details of the contract which I have told you about which accepts direct liability to you, the customer – and post it here.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help what do i do HFO are stressing me out!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5814 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks i'm new so please be gentle,

 

I am being harrassed by HFO re a welcome finance debt which was originally a loan for £500 and is now £1927.91 and 2 "3" mobile phone contracts for £324.66 and £229.77 I have asked HFO to stop calling me but they constantly do.. What do i do next? Other creditors are reasonable but these guys have been rude and abusive. I recieved a voicemail the other day from them with my date of birth and full name and address details which i thought must be in violation of the data protection act? Does anyone know? A little background i'm just into employment after 3 yrs of none so am trying to clear my debts.. someone please help!!!

 

Thanks

CCA sent Crapquest ran away...

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can, unplug your 'phone overnight while you're sorting this one out. If they do catch you though, either hang up immediately or refuse to go through "security".

 

Initially, you need to send a CCA request to HFO for the Welcome loan. I will provide a link for this shortly. Can you remember how much of this you actualy paid off when it was still with Welcome ? If HFO don't have it, then they can't enforce the debt.... but if they can, then the debt needs to be paid. Having said that, arrangements can be made to pay what you can afford... and not what HFO want you to afford :rolleyes:. There's a big difference.

 

As for the mobile 'phone debts, unfortunately these are not covered by CCA law, although I have known folk to send requests off anyway (myself included) and the DCA has been too stupid to realise..... so it's up to you. At the very least though, you are entitled to a statement of account (free), detailing precisely how they have managed to get the figures that they have for each of your mobile accounts and a breakdown of any charges that have been added.

 

As with all communication, this needs to go off by recorded delivery, unsigned (just initialled).... and the receipt kept in a safe place, along with a note of what it relates to.

 

There are certain harrassment letters that can also be sent, but I will get to these later. Back with the CCA link in a bit....

Link to post
Share on other sites

The link is here :

 

Creditors and DCAs - Letter Templates & Budget Planner

 

Letter N is the one you need. Enclose a £1 postal order for the fee (not a cheque) and do not sign it... just initial or print. Send by rec. delivery and wait. The account is now in dispute and will remain so until/unless HFO are able to comply within set timescales. If they have not complied within 12 working days from receipt of your request, then you can stop paying anything until they can comply. A lot of them can't, which is why the CCA request is so powerful.

 

This won't apply for the mobile 'phone accounts, so you'll need to either bluff these with a CCA request anyway (for each account) or, write and ask for a detailed breakdown of how they've gotten the figures they have, along with written proof of their entitlement to collect on these accounts now. Do not sign these letters..... just initial/print and send by rec. delivery. Keep the receipts.

 

Back with some harrassment material in a bit.... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok... send separately by rec. delivery and keep the receipt, once again. Do not sign, just initial/print.

 

Dear xxxx

 

Your Ref xxxxx

 

COMPLAINT

 

I have growing concerns over your attempts to plague my home with unwanted 'phone calls, several times a day and at all hours of the day, instead of contacting me in writing, as requested.

 

I would therefore like to re-iterate : that I will only communicate with you in writing. Should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, then please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you or with any company that you claim to represent, or who may be represented by you.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

Without ambiguity, I trust I make myself perfectly clear and invite your considered response before taking this matter further with the relevant authorities, including but not limited to, Trading Standards and the Office of Fair Trading. In light of your past behaviour however, I also now require details of your Complaints Procedure, together with your Consumer Credit Licence number by return.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all of that! I hace made formal complaints today against HFO with The OFT, Trading Standards and Information Commissioners Office I've now recieved 14 calls today alone...

 

Cheers for the help was going out of my mind....

CCA sent Crapquest ran away...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CCA request is legally-binding. Providing you know it's been received (rec. delivery slip), they're under a legal obligation to comply, along with a Statement of Account. If they cannot, then they have no business pursuing you for money on an unsubstantiated debt.

 

14 calls already though !!.... :eek:..... log them all if you can, whether answered or not.... but do not talk to them.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Niteman33. Things aren't as bad as HFO make out. It is a typical tactic of DCAs to bully, harass and threaten debtors. You have our sympathy and support (we've all been there!).

 

PriorityOne has suggested writing to them to tell you will only communicate in writing. That's a good start and should get rid of the harassment calls.

Then do the CCA request. Do it as a separate letter and follow the usual guidelines here.

 

Send all correspondence recorded delivery although it does get expensive.

 

 

Keep us posted.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dug out my old bills today on the 2 "3" accounts that HFO are collecting for! HFO are asking for £304.95 for a bill i have confirmed with "3" that should be £229.77. The other HFO want £433.57 again "3" confirmed it to be £324.66. Can they really make me pay an extra £75.18 and £108.91 respectively? Is these sort of charges even legal I have signed no credit agreements with them?

 

PS I'm wising up to DCA's now

CCA sent Crapquest ran away...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you not received anything in writing at all from HFO ? In that case, you could delay sending the CCA request until they send you something with a ref. on it.... and just focus on the 'phone harrassment side of things for now.

 

HFO cannot get you to pay their own charges, no. It won't stop them from having a go though. If you can get something in writing re. the accounts from "3" to confirm the balance owed, this would make life easier.... but no worries there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"3" faxed me copies today of balances when they handed over the debt to HFO i also spoke to them with reference the harrassment HFO have caused me and what i'd done about it and was appologised to on behalf of "3".... Which i thought was nice if not a little weird lol

CCA sent Crapquest ran away...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Why on earth did you arrange a consolidated Yes loan ? As far as I can see, you've had no confirmation that you owe the amount that HFO are after. Are you saying that the Yes application was rejected ?

 

If the debts are over 6 years old, they will have dropped off your credit file. If not, then they may be listed with Experian or Call Credit instead.

 

Don't talk to HFO on the 'phone... hang up and then log it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only notification from HFO is the 2 mobile phone contracts, I have spoken with 3 who tell me the accounts where closed in 2005 yet I have letters from 3 saying HFO now own the debts as of the 12th May 2008.

 

Yes Loans are crap they said they were sending info out I have recieved nothing!

CCA sent Crapquest ran away...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under recomendation of CCCS i called HFO and told them these debts dont exist they back tracked for a while and then a little aggressive saying they can see my report on Equifax and Call Connect which I think they mean Call Credit. Then she tells me to fax my report to them! Am i nuts! That will never happen....

CCA sent Crapquest ran away...

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they can see it why can't you and have you checked to see if they have done a search and left a 'new' marker. This would be absolute proof that they are 'cheating' the system.

 

DONT send them anything, you are not obliged to. Send them a CPR Part 18 request instead and threaten court action to them....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...