Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Have I got a case?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5819 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks

 

Woke up this morning to find this on the Daily Mail website. I headed off to the thisismoney website and went through the questionnaire to see if I could claim.

 

Apparently because I had no idea you could go somewhere else for PPI I could have grounds for a claim. I also had no idea that my PPI only lasted for 5 years. My loan was taken out in April 2005 and was due to end April 2011.

 

My loan was repaid in full in April as I was sick of paying off money to a loan company.

 

Also. I keep reading about single premium payments. How do I know if this was how mine was done?

 

I know from phoning them and asking for a settlement figure that when they gave it to me they would say, "your figure is X amount minus off payment protection left in the loan".

 

From this I am assuming that there was some kind of pot of PPI that each month when I made a payment they would deduct a little more off the payment protection.

 

I stuck in a claim based on the following grounds. Do you folks think I have a chance?

 

I was not informed that stress and back problems were excluded from the insurance. (I resigned from my last job due to stress. It was 6 months before I got back on my feet, although I didn't claim on my PPI I just kept paying my installments) EDIT! (Bugger, I just found the original documentation and it is in there:( )

 

I was not asked whether I already had any existing insurance or employer benefits that would cover my repayments. (definitely never asked this)

 

It was not explained that the PPI would not run for the full course of the loan. (Never told this. I always imagined that I was paying the PPI for the length of the loan and that I was covered up until the end) EDIT (On the original documentaion it states under Duration and Termination that the policy will cover the term of the agreement up to a maximum of 120 months)

 

When I tried to cancel my insurance the refund I was offered did not represent a fair refund as is requiredder the FSA. (I remember asking one day about cancelling it. From what I was told it sounded pointless to do so.)

 

Looking at the original agreement that I signed they stated the PPI was £2131.20 plus £414.00 interest!!!

 

What do you think? Grounds for a refund?

Edited by quisait
Link to post
Share on other sites

hello,

 

a case against whom?

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A case against AA personal finance.

 

For me, at the very least, they sold it to me without telling me that I could have got my cover elsewhere and they never asked if I had any existing cover

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello quisait,

 

Do you have all of the original paperwork?

 

If not, I would suggest the following to ensure you will have all the documentation they say they sent to you. CCA, Terms and Conditions, Policy documentation and any other data they hold on you as an individual.

 

Quote:

However, if the data subject is adamant that he or she wishes to receive a copy of everything the data controller holds on him or her, then there is very little the data controller can do about this, and a completely exhaustive search of the computerised and manually held data in the organisation will be required.

 

1. Send them a Data Subject Access Request with a postal order for £10.00 which is the legal fee by statute. Keep a record of the postal order number. That way there is no cheque which means no signature.

This is the reference from the Data Protection ACT 1998.

 

 

Quote:

I am entitled to by Law to request you to provide me with all data which is relevant to me within the terms of the Data Protection Act 1998. Under Section 7 sub section (1) ( c ) ( i ) and (ii) you are required to communicate to me in an intelligible form, the information as requested within the requirements of the Act section 7 (2) (a) and (b), which as the data subject I have met.

The Blue is what they have to provide but be specific and ask for data in all formats, written, computerised/electronic, microfische, tapes, CD, anything you can ask for. Also request fully legible copies that can be produced in a Court of Law as accurate copies of what they hold with regard to the account.

The Red means you have followed the Act by providing the required fee of £10.00.

They have 40 days to provide everything you ask for or they are in breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 and you can then issue a formal complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (Information Commissioners Office) and indeed the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS).

 

Please check out my thread....you will see the fight you may have to put up. But it is worth it.

alanalana PPI claim against RBS (looking for some help) please

 

The aim of the game is to get all the information you may be required to present in Court and If there is anything dodgy the Judge will see it.

 

If they do not provide all you ask for in your SAR then you can complain to the Information Commissioners Office.

 

You will have the option of asking for repayment of the PPI if they do not reply to your request for repayment within 8 weeks or if they give you a refusal saying this is our final word on the matter then you can...

 

Submit a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) if he upholds your complaint then success if he does not uphold your complaint you can then proceed to Court action.

 

You cannot do it the other way around if you go to Court and lose your case the FOS will not take up a complaint from you.

 

FOS is probabably the longer way to try to recover your money but at least you can have two attempts doing it this way.

 

Hope this helps you get started

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Alana:D

 

I do have all the paperwork.

 

Being like a bull at a gate I sent off my letter without actually finding my original documentation.:o

 

Reading the paperwork it knackers the following agruments that I put:

 

1) I was not informed that stress and back problems were excluded from the insurance.

 

2) It was not explained that the PPI would not run for the full course of the loan.

 

On point two it says in my notes that the protection runs for 120 months.

 

However. Despite these downfalls in my agrument I still believe in the following:

 

1) I wasn't asked if I had any insurance that would cover, be it from an employer or other company

 

2) I wasn't told that I could buy my cover anywhere else

 

I believe I may have some kind of case. When you look at the amount of PPI that they were going to charge over the length of the loan it was just over half the amount I originally borrowed!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello quisait,

 

However. Despite these downfalls in my agrument I still believe in the following:

 

1) I wasn't asked if I had any insurance that would cover, be it from an employer or other company

 

2) I wasn't told that I could buy my cover anywhere else (this in light of the preliminary findings by Competition Commission could possibly give you a case) see this link...

http://www.competition-commission.or.../pdf/18-08.pdf

 

I believe I may have some kind of case. When you look at the amount of PPI that they were going to charge over the length of the loan it was just over half the amount I originally borrowed!!!

 

You could start with a request for repayment of your PPI and if they say no, or do not answer within 8 weeks you can submit a complaint to the FOS you lose nothing by going to the FOS. They will now be aware of the Competition Commission findings.

 

hope this helps

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...