Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

checkoutdolly V,s debenhams


checkoutdolly
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5819 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Did you send a SAR? if so, they ahve 40 days to comply, no matter how high the demand is.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Got my reply today the usually bog off letter would refund the difference between £15.00 and £12.00 in guidance with OFT's ruling in fact have credited account with £139.00 need to find the link for LBA and the one where you acknowledge their refund but still want the rest any help please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi COD

 

Send the normal LBA (I think the library ones are not available at the moment - ther is one on my GE Money thread. Insert a entence thanking them for the offer which you accept as part settlement only.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Checkoutdolly,I am at a similar stage with mine. I am due to file the N1 this week as the lba went 10 days ago. Out of curiosity what %apr are you putting on your claim? I am planning to go with 29.9% interest ( their rate) as long as I continue to stay brave! Makes a HUGE difference to the value of the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

next stop with this is file at court as they are not going to refund so a quick question

when i read poc it says show when payment was made do i have to do a sheet when i made all payments to this account as well as a spreadsheet for charges i am claiming back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well filed at court today so fingers crossed it all goes smoothly must say i found doing the poc a bit daunting but got there in the end just hope i done it all correct will hear if i havent i suppose

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
well recieved an acknowledgment yesterday from court G.E money intend to defend suppose its a case of waiting now to see what their defence is?
As I have remarked on other threads, saying they intend to defend and actually defending are two entirely different things.

 

They may or may not produce a defence but one thing I am 99.99% certain of is that they will not actually defend the case, ie turn up in court to defend it.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

well surprise surprise got a latter today off salans. my claim is only for £322 then the 8% court interest they have offered me a sum of £200 in final settlemant of the matter reckon that leaves me about £200 short with court fees added anyone got a nice reply i can e-mail them refusing as im guessing that will be your advice to me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just write a short, polite letter in plain English thanking them for their offer which you accept as part settlement only and tell them that you have every intention of carrying on the case until you get all that you have asked for. Tell tem you hope that makes your position clear.:)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Checkoutdolly

 

Received your PM for a letter or email.

 

Try this, amend to suit:

 

YOUR NAME

YOUR ADDRESS

YOUR POST TOWN

YOUR POSTCODE

 

BANK NAME

BANK ADDRESS

BANK POST TOWN

BANK POSTCODE

 

TODAY’S DATE

 

 

Dear sir/madam,

 

Thank you for your letter received on XX/XX/XX and the offer of £XXXX in settlement for my request for refund of charges totalling £XXXX.

 

I thank you for your offer and i accept the offer of £xxx, as part settlement of my claim. Any thing less than the full amount paid in my claim, is not to be considered as full and final payment. I will continue to pursue the full amount of £XXXX as originally requested plus any additional charges that may have been added to my account since the start of this correspondence.

 

I am aware that terms & conditions of your account contract are unfair, as the charges applied are penalty charges, which are 'to the detriment of the consumer'. The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 highlights these in Section 5 clause 1.

 

5. - (1) A contractual term which has not been individually negotiated shall be regarded as unfair if, contrary to the requirement of good faith, it causes a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations arising under the contract, to the detriment of the consumer.

 

On 24th April 2008, Mr Justic Andrew Smith passed judgement that the UTCCCR 1999, did apply to bank charges.

 

I trust that we can reach agreement on this and I look forward to receiving a full and unconditional payment of £XXXX. If I have not received this within 14 days, I will have no choice but to continue with the legal proceedings to resolve this matter.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

YOUR NAME

Edited by ukaviator

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes, no talking. Keep everything in writing, good usable papertrail ..

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

There you go. . . well done. Great job. :)

 

Not sure why that is, have you emailed them back?

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

e-mailed them and this is the reply i got

Dear mrs hickling]

[Thank you for your e-mailI will date the order when I sign it on behalf of my client the order will be formally agreed when both parties have signed not just one. this is why I will date it when I sign it. I will sign it as soon as i recieve it from you]

trust this clariefies the situation and i lokk forward to recieving the signed but not dated Order]

yours sincerly

Philip beswick

Yes it has a confidentiality clause on it dont really understand that what does it stand for

Edited by checkoutdolly
had fonts on it
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...