Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • First begging letter received from Overdales   ;Blah blah blah, our client's are going to win this blah blah blah we supplied all your documents under CPR   PS you can stop all this by paying £1200 less in a lump sum
    • Right,  so the court hasn't send out the Directions Questionnaires/N180s yet. PE's one is a false one, meant to intimidate you into thinking your defence was rubbish and they are confident with their claim. This is par for the course.  The PPCs do this regularly. However, PE have gone further and written that "a copy has also been filed with the court" which is a lie as the court haven't even sent out the papers yet. Keep a screenshot of MCOL, later on in your WS you can draw attention to their lying and abuse of court procedure. If you've got time on your hands, then complain to the BPA about one of their members lying.    
    • We need documents to be uploaded in PDF format. Uploading in Microsoft Word format discloses personal details relating to you which you should not be sharing. Click upload – to understand what to do. How did you pay for the vehicle? You start by saying that you should have walked away – yes you should. Not only because of the reputation of this company but also if the transaction isn't perfect you shouldn't get involved and you certainly shouldn't be taking the word of some used car dealer. Big fail! Why are some of your letter in black and some the in red? When you get some of the ideas in there – have you use a template from somewhere else? They aren't interested in a delay caused by some fire alarm or something. They certainly aren't interested either by the distress you are suffering. They have hundreds of customers who become victims of this kind of thing. All of those customers suffer distress. Big Motoring World don't seem to be very bothered. What are the faults which exist with the vehicle now? Is it just the splashing? Where is the splashing? What is it that is splashing?   Do I also understand that you purchased the vehicle without trying it at all and the first time you were in it and had splashing was after you had made the contract?
    • A claim was issued against you on 22/04/2024 Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 06/05/2024 at 13:28:08 Your acknowledgment of service was received on 07/05/2024 at 01:05:18 Your defence was submitted on 23/05/2024 at 21:20:03 Your defence was received on 24/05/2024 at 08:05:43
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

'Grandfather Rights' pre 1997 licence


Weird Al Yankovic
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4176 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I passed my driving test in 1986. In 2001, due to my job, I had to send the old style licence back to DVLA and I have a green counterpart with the photo part too.

 

However, my entitlements on the photo card are just B, BE, f,k,l,n,p.

 

Should it not also state C1 and D1 too? Or is it just accepted I am entitled to those groups by virtue of when I passed my test?

 

I say this as the DVLA explain the pre '97 laws but their website states that any new licence issued, as in my circumstance, should state C1 and D1 too.

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I passed my test in 1988 and I have C1, C1E and D1 on my photo licence.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't accept anything to do with the DVLA as 'just accepted', or the truth. They are a department of the treasury now and not traffic records, they just say they are.

 

 

Thanks for that Conniff.

 

However, what I mean is that if I was stopped driving a 7.5t and produced my licence to the police, and by them calling DVLA, would it be acceptable that even though my licence states just B, BE, the database would show I passed in 86 so I have the entitlement?

 

Surely if I passed my test back in 86 then there is no doubt I also have these extra entitlements?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who knows? I have only driven a 7.5 tonner once in the entire time!!

 

I would contact the DVLA for clarification if they can manage that;)

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who knows? I have only driven a 7.5 tonner once in the entire time!!

 

I would contact the DVLA for clarification if they can manage that;)

 

Hmmm, I've tried but it's a bit of a chore just to get to speak to somebody!

 

I will try again anyway-they are open tomorrow.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I passed in 1996 not long before all the new rules came in, I had to send my paper licence back for change of address a few years ago so it was a new photo one issued, all my catagories are still there for 7.5 etc. I would contact them and ask for it to be rectified free of charge since its a mistake on their part, saves a lotta hasstle if you get a producer from a cop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a change in classifications, many of them went from a single letter to a X1, where weight limits were restricted. I don;t believe this was in error, it was harmonisation with EU classifications. I think I lost the right to drive 35+cwt vehicles, but it wasn't an issue for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I passed my test in 93 and changed to a photocard in 99? my entitlements are B, BE, C1, C1E, D1, D1E, f,k,l,n,p

 

whatever they all are lol

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ooo hang on though, on the front it says that the license is valid to 13-22-12, surely that is not right, I thought that the license was valid till your 70th birthday?

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ahhh just read up, you just need to update the license after 10 years to keep up to date with your appearance

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that's what mine should read. It allows you to drive up to 7.5t.

 

they wouldn't allow it if they knew me ;):D

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me too!:D I recently went for a job driving a 7.5t vehicle and at the end of the test they said 'we'll call you.'

 

Except they haven't!!:lol:

 

 

PMPLMAO If yer driving of a 7.5t is that bad what ya worried about it not being on yer licence for? lol :grin: :???: :grin: :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

PMPLMAO If yer driving of a 7.5t is that bad what ya worried about it not being on yer licence for? lol :grin: :???: :grin: :???:

 

I've only driven 7.5t a few times and that was years ago. The job I went for (at an airport) offered a bit of training to get used to 7.5t but they were under the impression I had been driving 7.5t for years, a mix up with another applicant.

 

They looked at my licence and pointed out the missing entitlements, hence, once I get them on, I can commence training.:)

 

It wasn't that my driving was that bad, although obviously rusty, but more the fact that until I can prove I was always entitled to drive 7.5t on a public road the trainer was a bit worried!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...