Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

court claim from Robinson Way / Cap One


linz2011
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4915 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Linz,

 

Apologies I've only just seen this thread after you alerted the site team. Ok it looks from what I've read as tho you now have everything you asked for and need to make a defence.. problem is you havent changed the defence and now its so late in proceedings :-(

 

Ok, hopefully you'll get more/better advice from other site team members before tomorrow but in anycase:-

 

Ok, if you received all the documents from the court on the 12th then I would throw yourself on the mercy of the court and simply state to the judge that you are a litigant in person, not knowledgeble in court proceedings and unable to afford legal help but you have just received these documents and are still looking to put forward a defence and that you respectfully ask for further time to respond (7/14 days).

 

If the judge asks on what basis you think your defence will be on, I would just state that you have issues with the notice of assignment/default notice and the current claimants cause of action.

 

The downside to asking for more time is that you will more than likely be liable for the costs of the hearing tomorrow unless the judge decides otherwise. The only other possible strategy that I can think of at this late stage is to come to an agreement prior to the hearing with the claimant.

 

I think the agreement is a dead duck in that it looks to have terms and conditions although they are a bit small to read, you need to check that the prescribed terms are in there, if they are then the agreement looks compliant, if not then they will claim they were overleaf.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Linz,

 

Despite multiple requests during this thread you've not posted up the docs that have been requested to help you with your defence, specifically the default notice / Notice of Assignment. Is it because you havent got these documents? Are u saying you have never had a default notice?

 

Have you done a SAR of the original creditor in the past? if so do you have the comms log? does it show a default notice being issued?

 

To help you formulate a defence we need the complete picture, not drip feeds I'm afraid to say.

 

The agreement you posted up right at the start of the thread, IF the original agreement looks compliant to me, it does contain the financial prescribed terms and if signed by both you and them would be deemed an enforceable agreement imvho. After x missed payments you should have been issued a default notice and advised your credit rating was going to be marked with a default, this they would have done prior to selling your account on... when you would/should have been issued with a notice of assignment.

 

As to the sale of the company and all assets as it was in liquidation? to another company and then them suing you I would like to think that they would need a new NoA to show the transfer has been done but I'm not certain as it was more a recreation of the same company without its own debts rather than a new DCA to deal with.

 

All just my opinions I should add

 

S.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Shadow no SAR has been done to the original creditor

 

Ok,

 

[edited advice] Just remembered where we are with this..

 

The default notice should have been issued prior to your account being sold and being honest capone are normally very good at sending these.

 

The judge has given you a chance to get your amended defence in but i worry that you have a fightable case. I think the judge will just accept the creditors saying that capone normally send these out as part of there core business thus you must have received it, balance of probabilities :-(

 

..however the joining of this lack of default notice or them being able to positively prove you received it alongside the NoA issue may work in your favour.

 

I think you need help from one of the HFO people who have good knowledge of wrong claimant issuing litigation as if this debt was assigned to one firm if that firm liquidated and was brought out by another should they have issued another NofA I reckon so.

 

S.

Edited by the_shadow
Link to post
Share on other sites

At last!!!!

 

Linz2011, I'm really sorry but the claim number can be seen on both attachments through the biro marking out and the name and address on the supposed notice of assignment.

 

If you could re-edit the files and post them back up

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...