Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ae - thanks for your interest.  It's quite overwhelming to keep reiterating the background.  I've lived through a lot and put a lot behind me.  There is one property - that has unresolved civil litigation.  It's been subject to lots of litigation - as explained (LH/FH).  I also explained the lender could've sold it immediately.  They chose not to.  The crux of the remaining litigation is focused on the steps they took and why I shouldn't be liable for their failures.  My counterclaim raises issues of criminality.  I'm very tired.  Exhausted with looking backwards.  The trial proceedings are at their end - I am now only trying to figure if I have an alternative angle by way of a separate complaint or claim v receiver AND how I can force a sale before the issue would be dealt with at trial.  (Aside: i'm still considering if I can complain v broker and need to follow up with sra on former lawyer negligence) I'm considering Bazza's comment about fmv - 
    • What is the £3500 debt based on, estimated or actual readings? You may have all been paying an amount each month by direct debit but that may not have covered your usage so you still owe a debt.  If you are joint tenants for the property, all five of you have joint and several liability for any debt owed so you alone can be pursued for the full amount or they can pursue all of you for the full amount.  You need to find out whether or not British Gas has billed you correctly and the amount claimed is correct. 
    • The charging order is a red herring. If the IVA fails because payments are stopped, the IVA practitioner can bankrupt the sister. Depending on the amount of equity in the property, if it's quite high, that's a very likely outcome. Advising the sister to just stop making payments is absolutely terrible advice.
    • Bazza - fair market value is definitely contentious.  Your comment has made me realise I must consider it in detail over the last few years alongside the steps lender/ receiver took. I've made a start
    • could might oh what by a useless restriction k. people should never enter into IVA's in the 1st place 90% goes on their fees. and all the debts are consumer ones too...    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Barclaycard - County Court Claim**WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5637 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

PT, we have had no documents whatsoever, no credit agreements, no disclosure documents, NOTHING.

 

Neither have the court, that is why I sent them an informal letter asking for the case to be struck out. That is when my partner received General Form of Judgement or Order which ordered that

 

1. Time for Claimant to serve Disclosure Statement is extended to 4pm on 8th July 2008

 

2. If the Claimant defaults , the Defendant may apply, on notice, for such order he seeks.

 

We haven't had time to ring the Court yet to see if they met the above deadline.

 

I am going to assume they haven't sent anything - next thing this letter shows up in our post.

 

Blooming cheek!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 241
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh , thats nice then

 

No agreement, no disclosure by list, nowt , but they want you to negotiate

 

BLESS THEM

 

As a matter of urgency i would contact the court

 

then we need to look at what we do about this, i think an application for an order would be best but it costs money

 

however if the court strikes their claim out, then they are stuffed

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

then we need to look at what we do about this, i think an application for an order would be best but it costs money

 

however if the court strikes their claim out, then they are stuffed

 

Hi Paul

 

Would it be possible for Heather to include in the draft order for the strike-out an order for (wasted?) costs?

 

Cheers

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

PT, My partner contacted the court this morning and they have received papers from Barclays this morning, 9 days after their extension date. The lady at the court says this is normal, but we can write in and tell the judge that we are not happy, even though Barclays put in their letter to the court that we would not mind that it has been delayed.

 

The court are sending out a copy of the papers in today's post. What should we do now - I personally want to write to the court and tell them that we are unhappy that they did not meet the extension on the order and that we wish to apply for an order to have case struck out, but don't know whether we can do this.

 

Also, we have the issue of the letter we received trying to negotiate settlement of which the court have no knowledge of this letter and we are not able to show them, but we only have 7 days to reply to it.

 

PLEASE HELP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Heather,

 

Right,

 

Well, we need to see this credit agreement and other documents that they have sent the court.

 

quite simply until we see it, we really dont know the strength of their case

 

With regards to the letter, can you PM me the name of the person who wrote to you please, i have my thoughts and would like to confirm it either way

 

the best thing to do i feel, is write back to them and point out that they have not disclosed the credit agreement todate and they have once again missed the court deadlines

 

point out that until such time as you have received their documents you are not in a position to negotiate and will happily negotiate with them when they supply the information, which you have requested and have a legal right to

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PT, I don't know whether you've seen my earlier threads, but here is what my partner got sent from the Court, he received them today.

 

Barclays1.jpg - Image - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting[/url]

http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj187/Heather5824/Barclays/Barclays2.jpg

Barclays3.jpg - Image - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Barclays4.jpg - Image - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Link to post
Share on other sites

We can't ask to see the agreement as on Page 4 of this disclosure list it says that statements over 6 years and the original agreement are no longer held by the Claimant.

 

Also what about the letter we received from Barlcays which gives us 7 days to reply. time is up on Tuesday and this is letter we can't show to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can ask for a copy of the application form which is at point one of the DBL statement

 

with regards to the letter , i dont see what you can do about it, until you have seen the application form how the heck can you see if they have a case or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the page you could not read.

 

Barclays4-1.jpg - Image - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

 

Do you think I ought to write to Barclays and tell them we are not in a position to agree a settlement due to lack of paperwork we have not received.

 

And should I write to the Court to tell them that they missed extended deadline and we are not happy, and also inform them that we hold a letter we are not able to show them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so they no longer hold the original but they do have a copy of it

 

so lets aks for the copy under the disclosure provisions

 

we NEED to see what they have

 

it may be worth writing to the court politely pointing out that they did indeed mis the deadline for service of the DBL and as a result this is causing you frustration

 

the main thing is that you should write back to our friend at barclays telling him that you did not recieve their DBL until late and are not as matters stand in a position to negotiate until you have seen the agreement which this claim is based

 

Regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PT, I sent a letter back to Adrian Ruffhead at Barclays to say that we were not in a position to negotiate as we had not seen any paperwork and at the same time also requested he send me copies of the 11 documents he is relying on in Court.

 

We received those papers today and they consist of statements of credit card transactions from 2006, Mercers default notice, letters from Optima, with a Letter before Action, which we did not even receive, as well as a Barclaycard Application filled in and signed by my partner, but there are parts we cannot even read, that is why I have not uploaded a link to you to view it. There is a part on the application which says Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, but the small print is eligible.

 

What would be our next move?

 

Also I wrote a polite letter to the Court informing them that we were unhappy that Barclaycard went 9 days over the extended time limit to supply Disclosure Documents and asked that he stick by his Order and let us serve notice to have the case struck out. Awaiting a response from them on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with "letters to th court" is that they are placed into a file and read only when and if they are placed before a judge, and this in most cases only happens when a hearing takes place, as i understand it.

The only way of circumventing this is to make a "formal application" which you have to pay for, again as i understand it.

Perhaps others would care to comment?

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PT, I sent a letter back to Adrian Ruffhead at Barclays to say that we were not in a position to negotiate as we had not seen any paperwork and at the same time also requested he send me copies of the 11 documents he is relying on in Court.

 

We received those papers today and they consist of statements of credit card transactions from 2006, Mercers default notice, letters from Optima, with a Letter before Action, which we did not even receive, as well as a Barclaycard Application filled in and signed by my partner, but there are parts we cannot even read, that is why I have not uploaded a link to you to view it. There is a part on the application which says Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, but the small print is eligible.

 

What would be our next move?

 

Also I wrote a polite letter to the Court informing them that we were unhappy that Barclaycard went 9 days over the extended time limit to supply Disclosure Documents and asked that he stick by his Order and let us serve notice to have the case struck out. Awaiting a response from them on this.

Can we have a look at the agreement? the reason i ask is that over the past couple of days behind the scenes we negotiated a settlement with Vianos case and today we were able to go public with the result

 

i would really like a look at that agreement just to see what its like and if its anything like Vianos then you may be getting a call from a certain solicitor soon

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...